Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum > ENG Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 09:54 AM in reply to Glamorgan Wanderer's post starting "England should just try to bat time now..."
Oliver's Avatar
Oliver Oliver is offline
(SA) Passed Graeme Pollock's 2256 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South West London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Tottenham Hotspur
Posts: 2,270
Surely they can't declare. South Africa will **** 300 or anything really under 350... if we bowled as we did in the first innings...

... and it's not as though our attack will have improved in the one day off that it's had.

We cannot win with three bowlers bowling so poorly.

Will someone in authority now, do you suppose, put their hand up and say: "the schedule was too tough and basically (in a word) stupid."
__________________
Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 09:59 AM in reply to Oliver's post starting "Surely they can't declare. South..."
cantplaycantalk cantplaycantalk is offline
(PAK) Passed Abdul Qadir's 1029 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
My main national team: I support more than one national team
My other team/s: Durham, England, West Indies
Posts: 1,032
Can we bowl that badly twice?
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 10:05 AM in reply to Oliver's post starting "Surely they can't declare. South..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Over 300 runs the lead.

I love England fans very quick to panic. I really don't thik we can bowl as badly again, but I really can't see them chasing over 300. Game safe, only one possible winner - England. Saffers are too defence orientated to chase this.

Over rate is appauling - they fined Vaughan 100%, I think Smith should recieve a call to chat with Lloyd as well
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 10:07 AM in reply to cantplaycantalk's post starting "Can we bowl that badly twice?"
Oliver's Avatar
Oliver Oliver is offline
(SA) Passed Graeme Pollock's 2256 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South West London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Tottenham Hotspur
Posts: 2,270
Harmison presumably won't bowl... so we are let off that disappointment for a start.

I see no reason why Anderson would bowl better. He got two wickets with terrible deliveries. I mean here, deliveries that were so terrible that it would be laughable to say that they were the bad balls that take the most wickets.
He found almost no rhythm and for all the good works Troy Cooley has done with Simon Jones during his rehabilitation from what should have been a career destroying injury, and any plaudits he should gain from turning Harmison into the destroyer that he was against a hopeless West Indian outfit, he [Mr. Cooley] should apologise whole-heartedly for absolutely ruining the burgeoning natural talent that was Jimmy Anderson.

Furthermore, when you have a pivotal player who is prone to injury problems and you are also aware that he should probably not bowl too many overs in a test match, partially because he is that pivotal player and you don't want to have to let him sit a match out because he is SO PIVOTAL. You do NOT agree to playing five Tests in thirty-odd days.

That is tantamount to madness.
__________________
Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 10:08 AM in reply to cantplaycantalk's post starting "Can we bowl that badly twice?"
The Worker's Avatar
The Worker The Worker is offline
Made a start
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: At Work
My main national team: England
Posts: 41
Now the lead is over 300, I don't think we can lose from here, given the light situation at the end of the day.

However, I still wouldn't declare and play the game out for a draw. We need to regroup and have a serious think about selection for the final test. S Jones has to come back, either for the unfit Harmison or the out of form Anderson (who just hasn't played enough cricket. Not his fault.)

Coach / Captain to come down hard on G Jones to sort his gloves out and Thorpe/Flintoff to get some runs.
__________________
Some people talk a lot, but they say little.
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 10:16 AM in reply to Oliver's post starting "Harmison presumably won't bowl... so we..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver
He found almost no rhythm and for all the good works Troy Cooley has done with Simon Jones during his rehabilitation from what should have been a career destroying injury, and any plaudits he should gain from turning Harmison into the destroyer that he was against a hopeless West Indian outfit, he [Mr. Cooley] should apologise whole-heartedly for absolutely ruining the burgeoning natural talent that was Jimmy Anderson.
Olly,

Sorry mate, but this is the kind of comments that really get my goat (nothing to do with Goaty though). Lets knock players, coaches when things aren't going so well. It just really annoys me as no other country would have fans like that.

However, we do also get too excited when we do well. I am sure I was not the only person that thought that SouthAfrica weren't going to just lie down and let us take the series at home. I think people read too much into the ICC Championship positions. the Saffers are fighters and proving it.

I agree with Ern's comments on the other threads taht what we needed was a hard work out before the Ashes. We have got that, it is a good series and both sides are competing.

We are quick to say that England haven't bowled well, but in neither innings have the saffers taken 10 wickets. What does that say about their bowling? The run rate in the 2nd innings was over 4 an over!!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 10:17 AM in reply to The Worker's post starting "Now the lead is over 300, I don't think..."
Glamorgan Wanderer Glamorgan Wanderer is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reading
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Glamorgan
Posts: 452
Well played Marcus Trescothick. For a bloke who doesn't look like he belongs at this level he certainly scores a decent amount of runs!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 10:18 AM in reply to The Worker's post starting "Now the lead is over 300, I don't think..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,517
I don't understand this. Most people (Oliver excepted) are saying England can't lose from here. I'm sure that's right. It might take a miracle, but England surely can win from here. So they should go for it. Hope MV declares at lunch - ten minutes before the end of lunch to make sure he pees Smith off again - and that we see the South Africans have a bat this afternoon. For about two hours. With wickets falling like ninepins. Or ten, to be exact.

And for anyone who doesn't understand what I am whittering on about - sorry! I need a new wristwatch. Thought we were already due for lunch. I'm an hour out of phase.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan

Last edited by Occasional Fan : 17-01-2005 at 10:31 AM.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 10:20 AM in reply to Glamorgan Wanderer's post starting "Well played Marcus Trescothick. For a..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glamorgan Wanderer
For a bloke who doesn't look like he belongs at this level he certainly scores a decent amount of runs!
Is this annoy Flanflinger day!!

Trescothick has just scored his 10th ton. Blasted 180 runs on a pitch when other palyers have strugelled. He averages 53 at home, 44 in all Tests!! Why doesn't he look good enough?

Last edited by flanflinger : 17-01-2005 at 10:26 AM.
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 17-01-2005, 10:21 AM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "Is this annoy Flanflinger day!! ..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,517
And England have declared

SA target is 325.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49 AM.

Page generated in 0.538 seconds (66.32% PHP - 33.68% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0