Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum > ENG Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2005, 07:43 PM in reply to Zainub's post starting "Michael Vaughan's averged well in his..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,620
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
                      M    I  NO  Runs   HS     Ave     SR 100  50   Ct  St
Batting & Fielding 62 60 7 1525 90* 28.77 68.91 0 12 20 0


If you look at Vaughans one day batting average, you will see over 62 matches, he only averages 28.77, not goood enough to merit his place in the one day team.
__________________
Ern
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2005, 07:53 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "M I NO Runs HS Ave SR..."
Pete Pete is offline
(AUS-captain) Passed Jack Ryder's 1394 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Isle of Wight
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,401
His strike rate isn't good either. Plus his fielding is ****.

I'd like to see Solanki at 3 and Vaughan move into Bell's place. The Sky crew were talking about him opening the batting with Tres, the same commentators that were moaning when he failed batting at number 1 too.

<-- Doesn't look sarcastic enough, it's too friendly.

Last edited by Pete : 06-02-2005 at 08:03 PM.
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2005, 07:56 PM in reply to Pete's post starting "His strike rate isn't good either. Plus..."
Pete Pete is offline
(AUS-captain) Passed Jack Ryder's 1394 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Isle of Wight
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,401
His highest average is at number 3..

32 innings, 4 not outs, 8 fifties, 0 hundreds, highest 90 not out Vs. Zimbabwe and 974 runs at an average of 34.68.
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2005, 08:47 PM in reply to Pete's post starting "His highest average is at number 3.. ..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,620
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
I dont see why they just don't drop him from the one day set up, along with Harmison, and now we have Pieterson batting OK, Flintoff can concentrate on Test cricket also, if we can find a bowler to replace him .

like who ??????
__________________
Ern
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2005, 08:50 PM in reply to Pete's post starting "His highest average is at number 3.. ..."
John John is offline
(NZ-captain) Passed Jeff Crowe's 1601 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
My main national team: South Africa
Posts: 1,626
jot1 why no joy John ? Actually I am quiet pleased.
I am a bit older than you and used to the media getting despondent when we lose or overexcited when we lose. Hopefully at the of the ODI we have turned a corner. And can rebuild a strong side and it will be once again be difficult to beat us at home.
As for Vaughan if he keeps on being selected for England in this series it suits me. He slows down the scoring rate as soon as he comes in but unlike Kallis (who also starts slowly )doesn't build an innings.
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2005, 12:38 AM in reply to Ernest's post starting "I dont see why they just don't drop him..."
Pete Pete is offline
(AUS-captain) Passed Jack Ryder's 1394 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Isle of Wight
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,401
I wouldn't drop Vaughan from the team altogether, just drop him down the order.
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2005, 10:45 AM in reply to Pete's post starting "I wouldn't drop Vaughan from the team..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,517
I'm with you on that, Pete. He might want to have a chat with Fletcher about where he should bat, but the idea of dropping England's captain really needs to be belted swiftly out of the ground. We've tried the "one team, two captains" approach before, and no-one was all that happy with it. Unless and until we decide to split the one-day team from the test team completely (by which I really mean everything from coaching staff and management, through the selectors and right the way to the players themselves - which isn't going to happen soon), we have to have one captain, IMO. And Vaughan is the man we need - he's the best hope we have for the contest that matters, starting in July.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2005, 01:30 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "I'm with you on that, Pete. He might..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
We need strauss opening with tresco, read in for jones, and I'm still not convinced vaughan is anywhere remotely a ODI bat. Useful backup bowler first class captain so if he has to be in, I'd have him at 6. Bowling, blimey where do you start. Young kabir Ali is looking the best followed by gough and thats only in patches, hoggy hasnt looked the part (looked knakered) and Harmo, well, less said about him the better. Stick him on a plane home and tell him to get his head out his ****. If we lose the next one, bring in jimmy, at least he looks as though he can take a wciket in ODIs
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2005, 01:47 PM in reply to Pete's post starting "I wouldn't drop Vaughan from the team..."
Milo Milo is offline
World XI (1980 onwards) -World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG) Passed George Lohmann's 1205 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
My other team/s: England
Posts: 1,236
Vaughan appears to be the same hinderance to England's one day batting line up as Hussain was. If the ball isn't going to the ropes, they just cannot score runs quickly enough. Not what you want for a number 3.
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2005, 02:30 PM in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "We need strauss opening with tresco,..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,620
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Rich,
I think Vaughan should step down for a few reasons.
1) He is a crap one day player.
2) This won't change, no matter where you place him in the order.
3) We dont wanr our Test Captain getting into loosing ways.
4) His confidence will suffer.
5) One day cricket does not matter that much.

I think one day cricket should be kept seperate from Test cricket.
From wherever they can, they should scratch together :-

5 Specialist batsmen.
1 Keeper/batsman.
1 All rounder.
4 Specialist bowlers.

If we can't select a one day team on these lines, it reflects poor on the counties.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasional Fan
I'm with you on that, Pete. He might want to have a chat with Fletcher about where he should bat, but the idea of dropping England's captain really needs to be belted swiftly out of the ground. We've tried the "one team, two captains" approach before,
Can't say I agree her OF, the man is a poor one day player full stop.

I may have to stand corrected, but I can't remember the two captain approach being tried with the England side, and if it has, for how long?.
My main worry for vaughan, and the other Test players, is when they have had a long Test Series, they deserve a break, Harmison has said he wants to come home, I wonder how many others (including Vaughan) want to come home as well.

just my opinion but the present one day set up, has not worked for a while, they Had to call Flintoff up last year, with just one leg.
__________________
Ern
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:51 AM.

Page generated in 0.547 seconds (67.83% PHP - 32.17% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0