| | |
![]() | |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| No point in selecting an out and out batsman: they've so many they don't know who to leave out as it is. A missing bowler ought to be far more significant... but now Gillespie and Kasprowicz are stepping up to be counted and Lee is finally regaining some form that ain't necessarily a good call either. The choice to see ommitted might be Gilchrist: I think the Aussies have decent alternatives.. but I think having a newbie in place of such an influential player would have an impact. Who would you give up on the English front? Geraint Jones: I suspect we'd be better off without him anyway. |
| ||||
| I take your point about the Australian batsmen Rachael, so I have no problem in saying I would like Australia to leave out Warne. On the England front it's a little more difficult, key for Pieterson, trouble is, Pieterson is not proven. Sorry Kirsty,maybe Gilo ans give Keedy a spin(scuse the pun), but no I think Gilo might just trouble the Aussies. So it has to be GO Jones for Read.
__________________ Ern |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ The thought police are everywhere.............. |
| | ||||
| Quote:
|
| | ||||
| ||||
| I believe that Pieterson has a first class average of 54 scoring over 5000 runs. There is no doubt that he can play the longer game. England would be crazy not to take a gamble with him. Recent history has shown that it takes individual brilliance to take down the Aussies. Pieterson could be that man (personally i wan,t him to play because i like attacking test cricketers) Butcher can be a match winner too on his day. Replace him for Thorpe perhaps?
__________________ The thought police are everywhere.............. |
| | |||
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy. Spike Milligan |
| |||
| Ernest, Probably not an answer to the same question, but as an Aussie, the player I am most worried about us losing is McGrath. He's currently irreplaceable IMO. Warne is incredibly valuable, but MacGill has stepped up before (2nd highest test wicket taker in the world the year Warnie missed because of his Mum I still think Warne is better than MacGill, but in terms of player missed most, its got to be McGrath. As a caveat, we Aussies thought that about Craig 'the Kid' McDermott before he broke down at the start of the 1993 Ashes tour, when a certain Merv Hughes stepped up |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Hi Leafy S, I think that IMHO England will manage to play McGrath ok, like they did with Pollock in South Africa. McGrath does not have Atherton as his bunny these days
__________________ Ern Last edited by Ernest : 21-02-2005 at 04:02 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |