| | |
![]() | |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Ohh you know, I'm sure you'll have one in the next 10-20 years
__________________ It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them! Nietzsche |
| ||||
| Tough. That is quite true. I'll go further and say, Pollock will be remembered as a great Streak will be remembered as a great Fleming MAY be remembered as a great Inzi will be remembered as a great Ashraful MAY be remembered as a great. I think youre right Ern...The team needs that star player power |
| ||||
| I cannot think of one English player that could be placed into the same catagory of the players named above. Who in the English team is capable of single-handedly winning a test or series? Butcher, of all people, is the only one that comes to mind but he was rather to mercurial to ever be a great
__________________ The thought police are everywhere.............. |
| |||
| Could be Strauss, or Harmison if he regains his form, Could be Pietersen or Flintoff or even Bell if he ever gets a decent run. Ponting also. |
| |||
| Quote:
Botham was past it as a bowler by 1982-3.. and was eclipsed throughout the rest of his career by the likes of Gower and Gooch. Ask a West Indian who they rated more and you might well find Botham rated a long way behind Atherton: the latter's was regarded as a HUGE wicket throughout his career.. where Botham struggled to command respect. I'd certainly rate Atherton as highly. Personally I'd also rate Jack Russell up there with Botham.... and probably Gus Fraser as well... and others might have Robin Smith, Alec Stewart and Graham Thorpe up there. Vaughan has also done enough already to be spoken of in the same breath. They have all been players who have looked as at home at the highest level as Botham, ever did. The results might not have been great these past few decades but that doesn't mean there have not been star players. Quote:
|
| |||
| I think we have to first define what a great is? Rachael names a number of players who I would say were good players but not Great players ie Gooch and Gower. I think great includes a number of elements to it 1. Consistency. 2. Signifcant match winning performances. ie Botham 1981. 3. The way they play. The style of performance. Now these three elements can play different proportions depending on the player. For example Tendaulkar is more consistent but I would say Lara has played more match turning innings. Therefore both are Greats for different reasons. |
| ||||
| Botham was a great Rachael, a once in a lifetime legend, ok he was only as good a bat as Atherton,and not quite as good as Gower and the like, but these were just very good players, not in the same class, as say Lara. What made Botham apart from the rest Quote:
This speaks heaps, Gough was Englands no 1 strike bowlers for years, Botham was only an all rounder. At the moment only Flintoff or Harmison look capable of ending their careers as greats, although Vaughan could yet still give a run, only time will tell. Quote:
We should have greats now to be a top team, but in your quote above, I take it you mean Australia, but IMHO they have greats in McGrath and Warne, you can't take that away from them, they will always carry that title. More to the point of your quote, are Australias greats, playing as great as when in their prime, IMHO I doubt it, that is one of the reasons I think England are ready to challenge, maybe we are not a great side, but neither are Australia anymore compaired to 2 years ago.
__________________ Ern |
| | |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
| |||
| If Vaughan had continued his form against Australia he would of been a Great now has left himself too much to do. Flintoff doesn't possess consistency. As I have said before a player who has not reached the top of PWC ratings can never be considered for greatness. If he is going to head in that direction playing well against the Aussies, India and Pakistan in the next year will be essential. Harminson until recently looked as though he might enter the greats. Unlike Flintoff he started peforming much earlier in his career. At one point nearly every spell he bowled look threating. If he bowled well against SA well the sky might of well been the limit. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |