Hide/show banner
England Cricket Forum

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

England Cricket Forum A forum for domestic cricket discussion.
Tell us about your favourite club in England. Who are the key players to watch?
- Featured Link: Cricbuzz.com - Fastest live text coverage & Live Audio

View Poll Results: Who should be England's wicket-keeper?
Chris Read 12 32.43%
Geraint Jones 4 10.81%
Paul Nixon 1 2.70%
Matthew Prior 2 5.41%
James Foster 9 24.32%
Stephen Davies 9 24.32%
Mark Wallace 1 2.70%
Jonathon Batty 0 0%
Other - please state. 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2007, 06:48 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "It's never right to judge players on..."
Henners Henners is offline
(AUS) Passed Damien Fleming's 305 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Daventry, United Kingdom
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Northamptonshire, Essex and Somerset
Posts: 325
I've seen some good batting performances by James Foster for Nottinghamshire, so he does make sense for the wicket keeping role.

Jones is well past his best form and Read has never really had it. To be a top international player, you need a good start. Trescothick, Strauss, Vaughan, Flintoff, Harmison, Panesar, are a few who have crossed my head as players who "had a good start."
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2007, 07:18 PM in reply to Henners's post starting "I've seen some good batting..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,731
Foster's batting was in division two last season... where the standard of the attacks and of the pitches made making meaningful judgement pretty well impossible... so make what you will of his 721 runs at 42.41. For guidance I've included the records of his colleagues... including Irani's 1075 runs at 59.72.
Code:
Name		M	I	NO	R	HS	Avge	100	50	Ct	St
A N Cook	3	5	2	424	132	141.33	2	2	5	0
A Flower	16	26	5	1424	271* 	67.8	6	3	17	0
G R Napier	2	3	1	131	62	65.5	0	2	0	0
R C Irani	16	23	5	1075	145	59.72	3	6	1	0
D Gough		7	7	4	173	52* 	57.66	0	2	1	0
M L Pettini	16	27	2	1125	208* 	45.0	3	2	14	0 J S Foster	16	20	3	721	103	42.41	1	6	65	3
V Chopra	8	14	1	523	106	40.23	1	4	6	0
R S Bopara	15	24	3	806	159	38.38	2	3	12	0
Edit: the side was in division 2 in 2005 as well....
Code:
Name		M	I	NO	R	HS	Avge	100	50	Ct	St
R N ten Doeschate	1	1	0	98	98	98.0	0	1	0	0
A Flower	15	24	5	1239	188	65.21	5	4	11	0 R C Irani	15	21	2	1133	103	59.63	1	9	5	0
A J Tudor	2	1	0	57	57	57.0	0	1	2	0
A N Cook	16	28	2	1249	195	48.03	4	5	12	0
Danish Kaneria	7	6	5	47	22	47.0	0	0	2	0
T J Phillips	2	3	1	91	89	45.5	0	1	0	0
W I Jefferson	14	24	2	842	149	38.27	2	3	10	0
J S Foster	16	23	4	696	107* 	36.63	1	4	33	6
R S Bopara	16	27	4	792	105* 	34.43	1	4	7	0
Edit: 2004 was no different...
Code:
Name		M	I	NO	R	HS	Avge	100	50	Ct	St
R C Irani	9	15	4	694	164	63.09	3	2	1	0
N Hussain	2	3	0	172	102	57.33	1	1	2	0
W I Jefferson	16	28	1	1411	222	52.25	5	5	13	0
J S Foster	16	24	4	927	212	46.35	3	1	39	5
A Flower	16	28	3	1045	172	41.8	2	5	18	0
A P Grayson	6	10	0	365	119	36.5	1	2	0	0
G R Napier	14	22	4	633	106* 	35.16	1	5	6	0
A Habib	13	21	0	722	157	34.38	1	4	3	0
J P Stephenson	3	4	1	90	40	30.0	0	0	0	0
A N Cook	12	21	2	568	126	29.89	1	4	18	0

Last edited by Rachael : 04-01-2007 at 07:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2007, 09:22 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Foster's batting was in division two..."
Golden Shower's Avatar
Golden Shower Golden Shower is offline
Into double-figures
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Glamorgan
Posts: 18
Read's batting is never going to be good enough at Test level.Presuming that Geraint Jones international career is all but over,I'd like to see James Foster being given a chance with the gloves.Matt Prior would be 2nd choice keeper.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2007, 09:53 PM in reply to Golden Shower's post starting "Read's batting is never going to be..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Shower
Read's batting is never going to be good enough at Test level.
At Headingley this summer, Read came in with the score on 192/4 and helped England to a far more useful 345 /5. He then returned in the second innings and in a 2-hour + knock he kept his head as the side imploded around him (he was last man out), almost single-handedly lifting England from 237/4 to their final total of 345. Over the two innings he notched up 93 runs.

In his earlier run in the side he battled successfully (ending unbeaten) to save the second Test in Sri Lanka (with only Vaughan and Thorpe doing more in that innings)... and then ran out of partners in the final Test as England imploded around him in Columbo: in both cases, one M. Muralitharan was wreaking havoc with his doosra... so neither achievement should be dismissed.

I'm not suggesting he's a great no 7 bat... but to suggest he's hopeless (just one Test after he ran out of partners against McGrath, Warne, Clark and Lee) is just plain wrong.

ps. I wonder how much pressure was added by having Flintoff the other end in the first innings of this Sydney Test? This is the captain who sat down with Fletcher and replaced him due to lack of confidence in his batting. Had it been Collingwood the other end... who knows: Read might have had far fewer nerves, showed greater composure and guaranteed his place for the forseable future!!!!

Last edited by Rachael : 04-01-2007 at 10:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2007, 10:28 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "At Headingley this summer, Read came in..."
Golden Shower's Avatar
Golden Shower Golden Shower is offline
Into double-figures
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Glamorgan
Posts: 18
I'm not saying Read's hopeless,just that in my opinion he's not good enough to bat 7/8 in Test's or ODI's.

His average in first class cricket is pretty good,but nothing more.6819 runs at 31.13.
Foster's stats - 4588 at 34.49 (admittidely not that much higher,still deserves another chance).
Prior's stats - 5676 at 39.14.

While I think it's pretty difficult to find someone who can replicate what Gilchrist does for Australia,England still need a wicketkeeper who can get runs lower down the order.Granted,Read hasn't been well treated or supported by Fletcher or various captains,but other ex-England players did advocate his dropping from the squad.Nasser Hussain for one.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2007, 10:35 PM in reply to Golden Shower's post starting "I'm not saying Read's hopeless,just..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,731
What I want to know is why so many people who've never been top glovemen OR Test batsmen are prepared to question Rod Marsh's judgements {a} that it's easier to teach a gloveman to bat than to teach a batsman to keep; and {b} that Read is an outstanding choice for England number 7.

Rod Marsh is no mug, and doesn't suffer imposters: if he thought Read was a no-hoper he'd say so... but he doesn't.

ps. One thing he HAS said is that Prior will never be a wicket-keeper: he doesn't rule out Prior playing as a batsman and great outfielder.. but sees no future for Prior behind the stumps.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2007, 11:28 PM in reply to Golden Shower's post starting "I'm not saying Read's hopeless,just..."
Keith's Avatar
Keith Keith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
My main national team: I support more than one national team
Posts: 2
Can Read play a gutsy inning so he can keep his place in the team?
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2007, 11:47 PM in reply to Keith's post starting "Can Read play a gutsy inning so he can..."
Keith's Avatar
Keith Keith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
My main national team: I support more than one national team
Posts: 2
Oh Dear, Read goes for 4 after facing 17 balls. Fortunately for him he got a juicy full toss and was able to punish it for FOUR!!!
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2007, 11:33 AM in reply to Keith's post starting "Oh Dear, Read goes for 4 after facing..."
Zainub Zainub is offline
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - Zimbabwe A 2005
Founder of the Official World-A-Team King of Spain Fan Club
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(ENG-captain) Passed Ted Dexter's 4502 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Karachi
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 4,515
Came across this (its an article featuring some of the statistical highlights of 2006), the following info should add a bit of an interesting twist to this discussion.

Quote:
England's under-fire wicketkeeper Geraint Jones topped the dismissals charts for 2006 with 46 catches and two stumpings in 11 Tests. He also picked up five dismissals in an innings on four occasions.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2007, 12:37 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "What I want to know is why so many..."
Ninjaman Ninjaman is offline
(PAK-captain) Passed Waqar Younis' 1010 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
What I want to know is why so many people who've never been top glovemen OR Test batsmen are prepared to question Rod Marsh's judgements {a} that it's easier to teach a gloveman to bat than to teach a batsman to keep; and {b} that Read is an outstanding choice for England number 7.

Rod Marsh is no mug, and doesn't suffer imposters: if he thought Read was a no-hoper he'd say so... but he doesn't.

ps. One thing he HAS said is that Prior will never be a wicket-keeper: he doesn't rule out Prior playing as a batsman and great outfielder.. but sees no future for Prior behind the stumps.
Maybe because being a top gloveman or Test batsman doesn't mean your opinions are always right!!!

There is absolutley nothing OUTSTANDING about Chris Read. Nothing!

And it might well be easier to teach a gloveman to bat, but Read is 28 and he better start learning fast!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12 AM.

Page generated in 0.601 seconds (66.12% PHP - 33.88% MySQL) with 14 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0