Hide/show banner
England Cricket Forum

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

England Cricket Forum A forum for domestic cricket discussion.
Tell us about your favourite club in England. Who are the key players to watch?
- Featured Link: Cricbuzz.com - Fastest live text coverage & Live Audio

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-02-2007, 01:08 PM
darksideofthemoon's Avatar
darksideofthemoon darksideofthemoon is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(WI) Passed Michael Holding's 910 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancs, England A Team
Posts: 911
Injuries

Vaughan's injury seems to be taking a long time to heal for a grade one hamstring tear. They said he has had two injections recently for it and I am wondering what kind of treatment he is having. I had tore a sartorial muscle in my leg and the physio (the same one Lennox Lewis uses ) used a magnetic resonator. Before I couldn't lift my leg and after it was as if it had never happened. I did have to have further treatments. Another item that can be used is ultrasound. Both machines are small and can easily be taken on tour. I wonder if England have them.

One thing I can't understand is why sports injuries are iced. The swelling is the body's way to bring heat to the injury and blood flow to start repairing it. Keeping on icing an injury is preventing that repair from happening. There are doctors who disagree on putting ice on injuries.

A true breakthrough in hamstring injury rehabilitation is ultrasound, you can heal your injured body twice as fast and significantly reduce the pain associated with your injury.
Hamstring injuries are the most common muscle injuries of all. The hamstring is a large muscle and healing can take a long time. What's worse, is that it's just not possible to stop everything and rest the muscle properly. Everyone has demands that make them keep going. In the process we prevent the hamstring from healing and worse, we reinjure it further setting back our recovery.

Constant re-injury needs to be avoided at all costs. Obviously, it delays the healing process, but what's worse is that every re-injury and additional healing cycle increases the amount of scar tissue that builds up in the muscle. Scar tissue is hard, inflexible, and tough to get rid of. The more scar tissue that develops, the more you loose the range of motion for that hamstring. This is going to mean that your muscle doesn't perform as well as it once did and it makes it much more prone to injury again later on.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-02-2007, 01:32 PM in reply to darksideofthemoon's post "Injuries"
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,605
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
If Vaughan needs intensive treatment so close to the World Cup, then IMO he is not going to be fit in time - if indeed ever.

Cold water (Ice) is correct to reduce swelling, this is not to repair the injury - but to stop and reduce swelling short term (like to continue a match).

Also bleeding at the point of injury will contribute to swelling, blood flows more freely when warm, and clots more readily when cold is applied.

EDIT: I have found this site on Google which explains it better that I here
__________________
Ern

Last edited by Ernest : 23-02-2007 at 01:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-02-2007, 01:44 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "If Vaughan needs intensive treatment so..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest
If Vaughan needs intensive treatment so close to the World Cup, then IMO he is not going to be fit in time - if indeed ever.
I know you won't agree Ern, but I feel that England are a better team with Vaughan at the helm, than without.

In ODI's he has never performed as he should have done, but if you look at his record as Captain - 59.57% of games are won with him as captain (England win 28% with Flintoff in charge and 33% with Strauss leading). However, in the first round of games I would only have him playing against the Kiwis, I would not risk him against the minnows (Kenya and Canada)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23-02-2007, 06:06 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "I know you won't agree Ern, but I feel..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,605
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanflinger
I know you won't agree Ern, but I feel that England are a better team with Vaughan at the helm, than without.
I could agree ff if England still had Trescothick and Thorpe in the side, think I have against Vaughan is is prolonged absence from the side, and an even greater run of bad forrm, this England batting just can't IMO carry passengers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flanflinger
In ODI's he has never performed as he should have done, but if you look at his record as Captain - 59.57% of games are won with him as captain (England win 28% with Flintoff in charge and 33% with Strauss leading)
Yes but his successes where in the past - England did not fall to #8 just under Flintoff and Strauss, in fact Flintoff has performed quite well in the recent Tri Nations Trophy.

I tell you what ff - what about Vaughan as England coach?, he has a ruthless streak that could well take England back to 2004/5.
__________________
Ern
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 25-02-2007, 10:09 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "I could agree ff if England still had..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest

I tell you what ff - what about Vaughan as England coach?, he has a ruthless streak that could well take England back to 2004/5.
A possible option for the future, but I still hope to see him play for England for a few more years!!
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:57 PM.

Page generated in 0.451 seconds (60.63% PHP - 39.37% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0