Hide/show banner
England Cricket Forum

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

England Cricket Forum A forum for domestic cricket discussion.
Tell us about your favourite club in England. Who are the key players to watch?
- Featured Link: Cricbuzz.com - Fastest live text coverage & Live Audio

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 06:52 PM in reply to greg's post starting "Is Giles fully fit though?"
pie_chucker's Avatar
pie_chucker pie_chucker is offline
Moderator
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northumberland, England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Newcastle United
Posts: 1,675
I dont think so. I was posing the question assuming that Giles was fully fit though and certainly pre his injury. His bowling now for me is finished at international level.
__________________
Mark.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 07:52 PM in reply to pie_chucker's post starting "I dont think so. I was posing the..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,731
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by pie_chucker
His bowling now for me is finished at international level.
In November and December of this year England will be playing Tests in Sri lanka. Two spinners WILL be required. All being well, Panesar should get the first spot. With any luck, Giles should surely bag the second spot: he had an extremely good tour of Sri Lanka last time around... 197.3 overs in 3 Tests bringing 18 wickets (double any other England bowler) at 29.84 and going at a miserly 2.72 / over.

Even if you reckon someone else (Dalrymple?) might emerge to provide a credible challenge to Giles.... Giles will be in the reckoning because of the risk of Panesar or the other spinner picking up an injury.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 10:23 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "In November and December of this year..."
pie_chucker's Avatar
pie_chucker pie_chucker is offline
Moderator
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northumberland, England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Newcastle United
Posts: 1,675
If Giles is bowling the way he was pre injury I'd be happy to see him and Panesar line up in Sri Lanka.

Its just after watching his bowling since the injury he's bowling a bit slower and is getting no action on the ball, so no dip or turn. If he bowled like this because he wasnt fully fit then fair enough, but I'm not convinced (I'm more than happy to be proved wrong though!).
__________________
Mark.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 10:49 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "In November and December of this year..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,524
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
In November and December of this year England will be playing Tests in Sri lanka. Two spinners WILL be required. All being well, Panesar should get the first spot. With any luck, Giles should surely bag the second spot:
Interesting post Rachael - but I don't agree that two spinners will be NESSESARY, why would this be if we have Anderson - Hoggard - (maybe Lewis just in that situation), Flintoff and one genuine quick eg Plunkett or Mahmood.

Also if Giles is FULLY fit, then he would be as good as Panesar, so the spinner spot would be between Giles/Panesar.

The reason England don't need two spinners - is because anything England spinners can throw at Sri Lanka, they IMO will be equal to.
__________________
Ern
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 11:00 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Interesting post Rachael - but I don't..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,731
Look back at the last tour, Ern: Giles was England's player of the tournament! On Sri Lankan wickets, Giles will match the best of even an in form Hoggard and Flintoff (who should be the only seamers in the side unless there is CLEAR evidence that Simon Jones or one of the youngsters is going to be seriously threatening as a reverse-swing option.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 11:15 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Interesting post Rachael - but I don't..."
pie_chucker's Avatar
pie_chucker pie_chucker is offline
Moderator
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northumberland, England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Newcastle United
Posts: 1,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest
Also if Giles is FULLY fit, then he would be as good as Panesar.

anything England spinners can throw at Sri Lanka
Are you sure Ern?? Panesar is an attacking bowler and has already troubled good subcontinental batsmen. As an all round package Panesar is a superior bowler, even compared to Giles at his best.

If Giles was fully fit ( and bowling pre injury not the powder puff stuff he bowled in the last ashes) . I would play him but only alongside Panesar and not ahead of him.

Shouldnt that second statement say anything the England spinners bowl at Sri Lanka they have a spinner who can throw it back! - sorry couldnt help myself!
__________________
Mark.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 11:30 PM in reply to pie_chucker's post starting "Are you sure Ern?? Panesar is an..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,524
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by pie_chucker
Are you sure Ern?? Panesar is an attacking bowler and has already troubled good subcontinental batsmen.[...] As an all round package Panesar is a superior bowler, even compared to Giles at his best.
Yes I think a fully fit Giles would be better than Panesar in Sri Lanka - I think it would be wrong to judge is performence in Australia, the man had not played for a year.

It takes experience to bowl in Sri Lanka - the attacking bowler is not always the best option, and Giles is able to bowl an accurate defensive line that frustrates batsmen just outside leg stump.

I am with Rachael that Giles - Flintoff - Hoggard - and Jones if he is fit, should make up the attack with an OPTION to play Panesar or a bowler with no pace such as Collingwood as 5th bowler (providing Jones is fit).

Quote:
Originally Posted by pie_chucket
Shouldnt that second statement say anything the England spinners bowl at Sri Lanka they have a spinner who can throw it back!
LOL no Vaas is fine.
__________________
Ern
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 13-03-2007, 07:27 AM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Yes I think a fully fit Giles would be..."
greg's Avatar
greg greg is offline
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
WAT England A Selector-2005
(AUS-captain) Passed Bill Lawry's 5234 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salop/England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,242
I hope Giles gets his full fitness back but even if he does Monty is a far superior bowler.The only way Giles will get in the side will be as a number 2 spinner which i doubt we will need as KP should be persevered with as he spins the ball more than Giles and caused the Aussies more problems.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 13-03-2007, 12:43 PM in reply to greg's post starting "I hope Giles gets his full fitness back..."
darksideofthemoon's Avatar
darksideofthemoon darksideofthemoon is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(AUS) Passed Geoff Lawson's 894 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancs, England A Team
Posts: 895
I expect it will be Harmison, Hoggard, Jones and Panesar with Giles if needed. Plunkett going as the drinks waiter.
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Page generated in 0.520 seconds (66.23% PHP - 33.77% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0