Hide/show banner
England Cricket Forum

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

England Cricket Forum A forum for domestic cricket discussion.
Tell us about your favourite club in England. Who are the key players to watch?
- Featured Link: Cricbuzz.com - Fastest live text coverage & Live Audio

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 29-07-2007, 06:41 AM
Rachael Rachael is online now
Administrator
WAT selector
(ENG-captain) Passed Colin Cowdrey's 7624 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,671
Winter tours 2007/08: Sri Lanka and New Zealand

During yesterday's play at Trent Bridge the commentators discussed England's bowling depth and noted the dilemma facing those selectors charged with picking squads for the forthcoming winter tours of Sri Lanka (Nov-Dec, 3 Tests) and NZ (Feb-April, 3 Tests and some pyjama stuff).

Forget the batsmen for a minute: the Sri Lanka squad needs 3 touring spinners (and a spinner on standby) and the NZ squad might need 5 touring seamers (and a further seamer on standby)... and right now Panesar is the only certainty on the spin front (though Giles is prresumably an autmatic selection if fit) and Hoggard and Sidebottom are the only absolute certainties on the seam front (though Flintoff may tour even if only able to shoulder a pathetic workload, and dislodging the more experienced Harmison might perhaps require something very special from Tremlett and Anderson over the next few weeks).

Spin:

1. Panesar
2. ? < Giles if fit >
3. (Touring Sri Lanka) ?
Standby ?

In the frame: ???

Seam:

1. Hoggard
2. Sidebottom
3. ? Harmison
4. ? Flintoff < if 100% fit >
5. (Touring NZ): ? Anderson
Standby: ? Tremlett

Also in the frame: Simon Jones, Mahmood, Plunkett

Last edited by Rachael : 29-07-2007 at 06:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 29-07-2007, 09:14 AM in reply to Rachael's post "Winter tours 2007/08: Sri Lanka and New..."
greg's Avatar
greg greg is offline
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
WAT England A Selector-2005
(SL-captain) Passed Arjuna Ranatunga's 5105 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salop/England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,135
Well Giles won't be fit so we can forget him and neither will Simon Jones or we won't have learnt from past mistakes.

I have a gut feeling we might take Rashid to Sri Lanka as the third spinner behind Panesar and somebody else (probably Batty) as the cupboard is bare and he will probably learn more in Sri Lanka for a few weeks than in an academy.

As for the pace attack,it all depends who is fit.Hoggard and Flintoff are certainties if fit and then you need 4 more for Sri Lanka and 5 for New Zealand.My guess is that Sidebottom and Anderson will go alongside Tremlett and Harmison with Broad the extra man if needed.

My reason for the extra bowlers is the fact that they won't want to play 4 bowlers with Flintoff so as not to overburden him.I can see Freddie back in at 6 in Sri Lanka alongside 2 other seamers and 2 spinners which gives us a balanced attack.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 29-07-2007, 09:45 AM in reply to greg's post starting "Well Giles won't be fit so we can..."
Rachael Rachael is online now
Administrator
WAT selector
(ENG-captain) Passed Colin Cowdrey's 7624 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,671
I also see Rashid as the obvious "young prospect" for the Sri Lanka tour: he'd be a handy net bowler and could learn a lot... and if half the team went down with a bug he's good enough to be called upon.

I'm also expecting Flintoff to play in Sri Lanka alongside 2 further seamers (Hoggard and Sidebottom) plus Panesar. Giles is an automatic if fit... but if (as you suspect) he is not then options for the other spinner might be:

1. Pietersen and Vaughan (batsmen, occasional bowlers)
2. Dalrymple / Yardy / similar (bits n pieces players)
3. Batty or similar (bowler who can bat well against spin and can play Murali ok)
4. Another specialist spinner...

One major consideration: they have to have a plan 'B' for the scenario in which Flintoff is unable to play. This might warrant a 3rd specialist seamer... meaning that a second specialist spinner was out of the question. Using Pietersen and Vaughan (and the odd over from Collingwood) might be the obvious solution... and Rashid could figure (promote the wicket-keeper to 6 and play Rashid as a no 7 batsman who bowls)... but this scenario might swing the selectors in favour of Dalrymple / Yardy.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 29-07-2007, 11:35 AM in reply to Rachael's post starting "I also see Rashid as the obvious..."
feverpitch feverpitch is offline
Big double-ton
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 268
I wrote a piece on England's spin options for the winter: Third Umpire: Who is England's second best spinner?

I do not think Dalrymple is a candidate; he simply is not good enough with the bat and (especially) with the ball. This season he is averaging 10 and 70 for Middlesex, which sums it up.
__________________
third-umpire.com
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 29-07-2007, 08:03 PM in reply to feverpitch's post starting "I wrote a piece on England's spin..."
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(SA-captain) Passed Jackie McGlew's 2440 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,464
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
Should be an interesting tour of New Zealand for England. I can see England being pressed pretty hard by the Kiwis (if their full first choice bowling line up is fit) seeing how England have struggled against the swinging ball facing a relatively weak Indian seam attack. New Zealand in March is not exactly the height of summer (last year, I was watching the West Indies through the fog at the Basin Reserve in March) and the ball will more than likely swing prodigiously. Bond is a better bowler than any of the English bowlers in these conditions, and Franklin can be pretty tough to play with a swinging ball.

Should be an interesting series.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 29-07-2007, 08:48 PM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "Should be an interesting tour of New..."
pie_chucker's Avatar
pie_chucker pie_chucker is offline
Moderator
(ENG) Passed Eddie Paynter's 1540 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northumberland, England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Newcastle United
Posts: 1,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael View Post
... but this scenario might swing the selectors in favour of Dalrymple / Yardy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by feverpitch View Post
I do not think Dalrymple is a candidate; he simply is not good enough with the bat and (especially) with the ball. This season he is averaging 10 and 70 for Middlesex, which sums it up.
If the selectors even consider picking Dalrymple then they should have their sanity checked.

As feverpitch has said he clearly isnt good enough with bat or ball and to be brutally honest he is probably a worse bowler than KP.

I would be wary of picking Rashid as I feel he isnt ready yet, especially against bats who can play the spinning ball. He could be a big star in the future and i would hate to see his potential ruined by an unjustified early selection.
__________________
Mark.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 30-07-2007, 12:20 AM in reply to pie_chucker's post starting "If the selectors even consider picking..."
darksideofthemoon's Avatar
darksideofthemoon darksideofthemoon is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(ENG) Passed Andy Caddick's 861 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancs, England A Team
Posts: 886
Sri Lanka tour
1 Cook
2 Vaughan
3 Bell
4 Pietersen
5 Collingwood
6 Prior
7 Flintoff
8 Udal
9 Harmison
10 Hoggard
11 Panesar

12 Strauss 13 Ambrose 14 Rashid 15 Tremlett 16 Sidebottom
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 30-07-2007, 12:56 PM in reply to darksideofthemoon's post starting "Sri Lanka tour 1 Cook 2 Vaughan 3..."
engssmoothcriminal's Avatar
engssmoothcriminal engssmoothcriminal is offline
(ENG) Passed Clare Taylor's 226 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Shrewsbury
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Warwickshire CCC (Shrewbury town FC)
Posts: 231
To be honest the spin bowling cupboard is so bare that there really is little point taking three spinners to Sri Lanka and certainly no point in playing two spinners in the tests purely for the sake of it. Our last two three tours of the subcontinent has resulted in the selection of a couple of second rate off spinners (Batty and Udal) who could do an effective job with the bat down at 8 supporting the one international class sla and unsurprisingly they got caned by batsmen who are great players of spin. We'd be far better advised to go with the all pace attack (looking for reverse swing) and give Monty a heavy workload (which is something he seems to thrive upon) with a few overs of KP and Vaughan thrown in for variety.

Gary Keedy gets brought along as his like for like replacement (like Monty he can't bat, can't field but is a pretty decent left arm spinner) in the event of injury or illness. The pasting that Adil Rashid recieved at the hands of Tendulkar in the Lions game should make it clear that he is not remotely ready for the big time and he will benifit far more from an A tour.

Last edited by engssmoothcriminal : 30-07-2007 at 01:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 30-07-2007, 07:45 PM in reply to engssmoothcriminal's post starting "To be honest the spin bowling cupboard..."
darksideofthemoon's Avatar
darksideofthemoon darksideofthemoon is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(ENG) Passed Andy Caddick's 861 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancs, England A Team
Posts: 886
Thinking about it you are probably right esc. You have changed my mind on taking 3 spinners to Sri Lanka.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2007, 09:14 PM in reply to Rachael's post "Winter tours 2007/08: Sri Lanka and New..."
Rachael Rachael is online now
Administrator
WAT selector
(ENG-captain) Passed Colin Cowdrey's 7624 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feverpitch
if I had to pick a squad now, I would take [...] Swann and Rashid for the Tests
Same verdict in today's Torygraph: Swann looks England's best second spinner - Telegraph
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:43 AM.

Page generated in 0.564 seconds (62.73% PHP - 37.27% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0