Hide/show banner
England Cricket Forum

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > England Cricket Forum
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

England Cricket Forum A forum for domestic cricket discussion.
Tell us about your favourite club in England. Who are the key players to watch?
- Featured Link: Cricbuzz.com - Fastest live text coverage & Live Audio

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2007, 09:35 AM
Harmy's Army Harmy's Army is offline
(AUS) Passed Bruce Reid's 93 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Derbyshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 96
Oval team selection

Given the tradition of the Oval to favour pace (and bounce) over swing, and in addition England's woefully understrength tail of the previous two tests, is it likely that Stuart Broad will get his first test at the expense of either Anderson or Sidebottom? And if so which of the two?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2007, 11:13 AM in reply to Harmy's Army's post "Oval team selection"
engssmoothcriminal's Avatar
engssmoothcriminal engssmoothcriminal is offline
(ENG) Passed Clare Taylor's 226 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Shrewsbury
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Warwickshire CCC (Shrewbury town FC)
Posts: 231
Well if Broad comes into contention solely on the basis of his much hyped lower order batting then someone on the selection panel deserves a good kicking (preferably Graveney). At the moment he's a perfectly competent county number 9 who one day (ideally after 2/3 years of county cricket) could bat higher not the replacement for Gilo at 8 this side so badly needs.

So it all comes down to has Broad done anything with the ball since being overlooked for the first test to justify selection and given he's barely bowled for Leicestershire the simple answer is no. Anderson bowled pretty darn well at Lords so to drop him for a debutant in a must win game at the Oval (which this season has been flat and devoid of pace and carry) on the back of one bad performance at Trent Bridge just smacks of the random knee jerk selections of the dark days of the 80's 90's. Something I thought we were long past.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:07 PM in reply to engssmoothcriminal's post starting "Well if Broad comes into contention..."
pie_chucker's Avatar
pie_chucker pie_chucker is offline
Moderator
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northumberland, England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Newcastle United
Posts: 1,681
I doubt very much that Sidebottom will be dropped - his place in the team at the moment is deserved.

Broad isnt that quick (and no where near as quick even as Anderson can be) so selecting him on grounds of pace woulnt be the wisest move.

Personally I'd have picked neither Anderson or Broad - they are both still far too raw.
__________________
Mark.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2007, 10:23 PM in reply to pie_chucker's post starting "I doubt very much that Sidebottom will..."
Moss's Avatar
Moss Moss is offline
Moderator
(WI) Passed Wes Hall's 818 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
My other team/s: England
Posts: 834
Sidebottom shouldn't be dropped - he has done very well so far. He may not be fast, but he's accurate and economical, plus he can bat a bit more than most bowlers.

Keep the squad as it is for now. I can see no point bringing in Broad for the last test of the summer, not when we have to win it. If it was a dead rubber, then maybe.
__________________
Mae hen wlad fy nhadau yn annwyl i mi
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2007, 10:55 PM in reply to Moss's post starting "Sidebottom shouldn't be dropped - he..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moss View Post
Sidebottom shouldn't be dropped
Quite right: the guy just bowled more impressively than most in world cricket EVER bowl... and must surely be one of the first 2-3-4 names on the teamsheet for the next Test: Pietersen may be a better cricketer... but aside from Panesar... no-one is harder to replace than Sidebottom... who should surely be regarded as undroppable right now!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2007, 11:46 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Quite right: the guy just bowled more..."
darksideofthemoon's Avatar
darksideofthemoon darksideofthemoon is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(SA-captain) Passed Alan Melville's 894 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancs, England A Team
Posts: 900
Anderson - reverse swing
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2007, 03:25 PM in reply to darksideofthemoon's post starting "Anderson - reverse swing"
Barmy Harmy Barmy Harmy is offline
Into double-figures
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
My main national team: England
Posts: 13
I think they'll stick with the XI that played at Trent Bridge.
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46 AM.

Page generated in 0.654 seconds (55.61% PHP - 44.39% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0