Quote:
Originally Posted by butchering lee i cannot begin to imagine how demorailising that must be for:
Vaughan - who led superbly. |
I might have been better saying that England would not have won the Ashes had Flintoff not been part of the team - yes Vaughan was captain, but with the England team on a high after beating all opposition out of sight for a year or so, that team could have captained itself IMO.
But I questioned his leadership on this board after he allowed Flintoff to get drunk as a skunk and show himself and the team up in public Vaughan was on the bus and should have stopped him, and yes Flintoff should not have got in that condition.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by butchering lee S Jones - who was the surprise package - that really unsettled Australia |
No he was no surprise package - he was England's big hope when they toured Australia in I think 2003, he was fast - and could bat, and yes he did play a major role in England Ashes win in 2005.
KP - Giles - Hoggy all played their part, Harmy after his 5 wicket haul at Lords did not IMO shine.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by butchering lee KP - who, ironically for me, was involved in two of 3/4 crucial moments[...] would in all probability feel slightly put out at your summary of the ashes. |
My post was not a summary of the 2005 Ashes, it was in response to this:-
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rachael Stewart, Botham, Gough and Flintoff have all been over-hyped in the media in games in which they have been indifferent[... ]whereas a better quality performance from (say) Crawley or Caddick has been the cue for utter castigation! |
I was mearley saying that Flintoff and Botham and others deserved the hype, and pointing out what he had achieved - I was not deriding any other player - and I think it fair comment to state that England would not have won the Ashes without Flintoff.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by butchering lee which goes back to what I was saying. this is nothing to do with England's potential - they simply should be doing better |
With respect I would would like you to explain why England have any potential to be a first class one day side after the results of the last few years.
England have the worst one day record of all the major test playing nations, and after the experimentation in the 20/20 WC, I can only see England getting worse eg: England played all their squad, it would appear just to give everyone a go.
I could accept your point had the 5-0 drubbing by India - had been a one off, but it's more the norm.