| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Quote:
My point was more that Botham's character and record was hardly that of an England Captain: something that undoubtedly explains why the guy has never, every, been let near selection panels (let alone the day-to-day coaching side of things) ever since. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
While I agree with a great deal of this, I do feel it necessary to mention a couple of points regarding the feeling of comfort that Hoggard and the England side have with each other, with reference to the inclusion last summer of the unfortunate Ed Smith. Somebody remarked from one or other media format, that nobody in the England dressing room would have heard anybody talking with an accent like Ed Smith's. Hoggard in an interview last summer went on to say something along the lines of: "he (Smith) went to Cambridge University, I went to a comprehensive" and then sarcastically added: "we had loads to talk about." I can just imagine how "comfortable" Ed Smith felt in the England dressing room... I wonder why he didn't get another go?
__________________ Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept Last edited by Oliver : 13-08-2004 at 02:06 PM. Reason: Wrong University |
| | |||
| |||
| Very much with you on Vaughan, Goatman: I really, really appreciate his leadership style.. and whilst we clearly operate with only the most superficial indicaters of his personal contribution... his team does increasingly seem moulded in his own image - at least with respect to the "prima donna" complex (Hoggard and Giles DO seem to be the model team players.. but so also does Flintoff: the giant egos that characterised the national team at times in the past would appear to have given way to something far, far more savoury. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept |
| |||
| Very good point on Ed Smith, Oliver... though that was VERY early in the new reign. One wonders, in addition, if something of the same "face fits" thing swung the Read / Jones decision so promptly: there certainly apppears to be a chemistry between Vaughan and Jones that was not evident with Vaughan and Read. On the other hand... we're operating so much in the dark that I'd hate to draw any very firm conclusions. |
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| |||
| Quote:
|
| | |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
| ||||
| Quote:
He played like a large green vegetable, because he wasn't comfortable in the dressing room set up. However, I think, to tar the Read/Jones business with the same "does the face fit?" brush is a little wide of the mark. Read was given the chance to score some runs, and he didn't particularly manage it... not that anybody did much against Sri Lanka and Bangladesh... that he didn't either in the Caribbean is a little more damning. Vaughan gets on well with Jones because he is a talented cussed antipodean character. It is difficult not to get on with those types. Chris Read was constantly under pressure and probably tugged his forelock over much toward his skipper, hoping that that might keep him on side. Sadly, it didn't... perhaps if Vaughan had bowled a bit more and Read had tidied up the sub-continentals with a few stumpings of the skipper's bowling, he might have kept his place. Ah well, I expect his is doomed to only play International cricket when young Geraint is injured. For shame.
__________________ Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |