Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > International Test Cricket
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

International Test Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general cricket issues, women's Test cricket and First-class matches involving Associate and Affiliate members.

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 18-07-2008, 11:27 AM in reply to Notts Exile's post starting "The 2nd Test continues in the same vein..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,617
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notts Exile View Post
I just hope they don't suffer too much from Billy's poor eyesight!
Happens to all umpires Notts, it annoying but nothing can be done to alter what's happened.
Gives Vaughan a chance to shine early.
__________________
Ern
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 18-07-2008, 11:42 AM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Happens to all umpires Notts, it..."
Notts Exile Notts Exile is offline
(IND) Passed Farokh Engineer's 2611 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Notts
Posts: 2,652
De Villiers has just tried to claim a catch off Strauss that he clearly grounded. An appalling attempt to cheat the England opener. I assume he'll be reported to the match referee as this was blatant.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 18-07-2008, 11:50 AM in reply to gibbs_fan's post starting "Why are we comparing the SA tail with..."
Collyisamackem's Avatar
Collyisamackem Collyisamackem is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chester, UK
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Somerset
Posts: 3,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by gibbs_fan View Post
Why are we comparing the SA tail with the England one.

I have more confidence in Collingwood, Amrose and Broad than in Ambrose, Flintoff and Broad. That was my point, the SA tail are weak (fact) but thats not what I was talking about.
a) Because you were talking about the English tail and there's a pot and kettle situation looking at your team.

b) I think we have generally better batting, especially with Broad at 8 and me seeing Boucher as no better (certainly not when Flintoff has batting form, which granted isn't right now) than Flintoff at 7. So the point was I think, McKenzie and a flat Lord's pitch aside, you guys have batting worries greater than ours.

NE - De Villiers should be suspended for that, anyone (English fully included) trying to claim a catch they knew for certain wasn't genuine should face a ban.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 18-07-2008, 11:52 AM in reply to Notts Exile's post starting "De Villiers has just tried to claim a..."
south beds mikey south beds mikey is offline
(ENG) Passed Andy Caddick's 861 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dunstable
My other team/s: England, Middlesex
Posts: 873
The De villiers thing did not look good at all

Morkel bowling really well and as I type gets rid of Strauss now. Bell has the chance to show his new found resiliance again.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 18-07-2008, 12:25 PM in reply to Collyisamackem's post starting "a) Because you were talking about the..."
gibbs_fan's Avatar
gibbs_fan gibbs_fan is offline
(AUS) Passed Clarrie Grimmett's 557 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cape Town
My main national team: South Africa
My other team/s: India
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Collyisamackem View Post
a) Because you were talking about the English tail and there's a pot and kettle situation looking at your team.
you have missed the point completely. I was talking about the impact the changes the ENGLAND team made. I was making some constructive criticism and just giving my views on the change. You seem to think that I was having a go at England.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Collyisamackem View Post
b) I think we have generally better batting, especially with Broad at 8 and me seeing Boucher as no better (certainly not when Flintoff has batting form, which granted isn't right now) than Flintoff at 7. So the point was I think, McKenzie and a flat Lord's pitch aside, you guys have batting worries greater than ours.
and the flat pitch did not contribute to Englnds 1st innings? Typical, England scored 600 because their batsmen are great but SA scored big because the pitch was flat.

With your top 3 out, 1 more wicket and it will be Ambrose at the wicket followed by Freddie. This is what I was trying to point out earlier. SA have a good chance here.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Collyisamackem View Post
NE - De Villiers should be suspended for that, anyone (English fully included) trying to claim a catch they knew for certain wasn't genuine should face a ban.
I havent seen the incident but if it is what you guys are claiming then I would like to see de Villiers dropped by SA for the next game. There is no place in the game for this sort of behaviour. Life ban, eh, Australia would have no players to pick . I think a life ban is ridiculous but I agree that some stiff punishment should prevent this from happening again.
__________________
434, world record for the shortest period. Whos choking now?
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 18-07-2008, 12:39 PM in reply to gibbs_fan's post starting "you have missed the point completely. I..."
Notts Exile Notts Exile is offline
(IND) Passed Farokh Engineer's 2611 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Notts
Posts: 2,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by gibbs_fan View Post
SA have a good chance here.
Very much so. Steyn and Morkel have bowled well, the latter looks very handy.

I don't think batting will be easy today or tomorrow, the forecast isn't wonderful for either day. You could well see higher scores in the third and fourth innings.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 18-07-2008, 12:43 PM in reply to south beds mikey's post starting "This has to be the most high risk..."
gibbs_fan's Avatar
gibbs_fan gibbs_fan is offline
(AUS) Passed Clarrie Grimmett's 557 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cape Town
My main national team: South Africa
My other team/s: India
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by south beds mikey View Post
This has to be the most high risk selection for some time. Ambrose at 6 and Pattinson seem to me to be questionable at best. I hope Miller knows what he's doing because if we lose this game then the knives will be out and probably with some justification.
I agree. Personally, I have not seen Pattinson bowl but after doing some checks on him, I found that he has only played 12 1st class games . IMO, whether he performs or not, this decision is ridiculous. There is no way that he should be playing ahead of Tremlett, Harmison, Hoggard, etc.

Also, I dont buy into the explanations given for his selection. People keep claiming that its because the test is at Headingly. Well, Morkel has by far been the stand out bowler for SA today, so, I would imagine that Harmison and Tremlett would have the ability to do well too. DaveGillespie has also shown that he is not the leading bowler in the county championship this season.
__________________
434, world record for the shortest period. Whos choking now?

Last edited by gibbs_fan : 18-07-2008 at 12:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 18-07-2008, 12:47 PM in reply to gibbs_fan's post starting "I agree. Personally, I have not seen..."
greg's Avatar
greg greg is offline
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
WAT England A Selector-2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(AUS-captain) Passed Ian Chappell's 5345 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salop/England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,346
Well we are in trouble again,good toss to win and it is all on Bell and KP to dig us out of the mire again.

One good thing is Ntini looks dreadful still.Morkel again looks the pick and Steyn has improved a lot since Lords.

They still need to bowl England out for less than 250 to make it a good decision to bowl though.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 18-07-2008, 12:57 PM in reply to Notts Exile's post starting "The 2nd Test continues in the same vein..."
Scott-Wozniak Scott-Wozniak is offline
(PAK-captain) Passed Wasim Bari's 1366 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Surrey
My other team/s: England and Surrey
Posts: 1,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notts Exile View Post
England's first wicket is another bad, bad decision from the umpire. I just hope they don't suffer too much from Billy's poor eyesight!
And as it panned out it was disastrous, not for losing Cook, but for opening a hole in the batting where they then nipped out Vaughan and Strauss. Goes to show what one mistake can do in the wider context.

We still can't really complain, mistakes get made and England had the option of trialing the referalls system, but declined.

But yes it's annoying.

Steyn certainly seems to have picked up Vaughan as his bunny. At first view it was a ball I didn't even think he had to play, but on replay it showed the ball pitching inline with off stump and that's presumably why Vaughan decided he had to play it, but the problem was, the ball swung just enough to catch Vaughans edge as he played the original line. ie it didn't go straight on but swung instead.

Steyn is doing to Vaughan exactly what Sidebottom does to left handers, angling that ball in just enough to get it to pitch on off stump and then straighten to take off stump or swing it away enough for the edge depending on how much it swings.

De Villiers tried to claim a shocking catch against Strauss earlier on, on replay it clearly showed it grounded before being taken and de Villiers didn't hesistate in appealing. Tut, tut.

Ntini has proved to be pretty ineffective again, he's not troubling anyone really.

Pietersen and Bell are counter-attacking now, well Pietersen is!
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 18-07-2008, 01:15 PM in reply to Scott-Wozniak's post starting "And as it panned out it was disastrous,..."
greg's Avatar
greg greg is offline
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
WAT England A Selector-2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(AUS-captain) Passed Ian Chappell's 5345 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salop/England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,346
For me the de Villiers incident was as disgusting as the Afridi dance on the pitch and any player trying to do what he did deserves a ban in my eyes.

Big innings this for Ambrose.
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:10 AM.

Page generated in 0.551 seconds (68.84% PHP - 31.16% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0