Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > International Test Cricket
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

International Test Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general cricket issues, women's Test cricket and First-class matches involving Associate and Affiliate members.

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 28-12-2006, 02:06 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Look at the Melbourne scorecard - who..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
The full aussie lineup but with KP instead of symonds and shuffle the order around a bit. You could put hoggy instead of lee (he had a good game today) but that would giave ern nightmares as the average speed of the seamers would be about 74mph ! You could swap langer for strauss if you wanted. After todays result, I'm not sure I care
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 28-12-2006, 03:17 PM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Look at the Melbourne scorecard - who..."
Oliver's Avatar
Oliver Oliver is offline
(SA) Passed Graeme Pollock's 2256 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South West London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Tottenham Hotspur
Posts: 2,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest
Look at the Melbourne scorecard - who saved Australia, and who gave England a chance - small but a chance??
Well it wasn't Flintoff was it.

OK let's put in Mahmoud for Flintoff. Presumably Flintoff won't make another score until he's been relieved of the captaincy. There is the parallel with Botham. In Flintoff's lack of performance. Not in his actual captaincy.
__________________
Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 28-12-2006, 06:56 PM in reply to Quagmire's post starting "Langer Hayden Ponting Hussey Pietersen C..."
KennyG's Avatar
KennyG KennyG is offline
Big double-ton
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria,Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria,St.K.F.C
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quagmire
Langer
Hayden
Ponting
Hussey
Pietersen
Clarke
Gilchrist
Warne
Hoggard
Clark
McGrath
We have a winner.
__________________
" You don't want the truth,you can't handle the truth."
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 28-12-2006, 07:15 PM in reply to Oliver's post starting "Well it wasn't Flintoff was it. OK..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,615
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver
Well it wasn't Flintoff was it.
Well I was going to say no - but have changed my mind - it was Flintoff, he took the three wickets that reduced Australia to 40 somut for 3, Mahmood took the tail.
__________________
Ern
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 28-12-2006, 07:35 PM in reply to KennyG's post starting "We have a winner."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyG
We have a winner.
Surely Read's solitary Test already bags him the gloves: Gilchrists astonishingly school-boyish and ham-fisted work behind the stumps precludes his selection, whereas Read has looked a class (or more) above than even the very best of Gilchrist (who currently loses out to Jones on glovework).

With one Test to go, Lee has clearly made a late bid for recognition with his first decent bowling performace in nine Ashes Tests.... but it seems to me that with one Test to go... two spots in particular remain very much up for grabs.

<opener>
Hussey
Ponting
Pietersen
Clarke
<batsman>
Read
Warne
Hoggard
Clark
McGrath

That said... the only guaranteed places are presumably Hussey, Ponting, Warne, Hoggard and Clark: this quintet (which should probably be expanded to include Pietersen) strikes me as having been a class apart from the rest.

Last edited by Rachael : 28-12-2006 at 07:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 28-12-2006, 07:41 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Surely Read's solitary Test already..."
Aussie-Yank Aussie-Yank is offline
.
(IND) Passed Vijay Merchant's 859 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davie/Fort Lauderdale/USA
My main national team: Australia
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael 125021
Surely Read's solitary Test already bags him the gloves:
Simply put - No.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 28-12-2006, 07:50 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Surely Read's solitary Test already..."
KennyG's Avatar
KennyG KennyG is offline
Big double-ton
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria,Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria,St.K.F.C
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
Surely Read's solitary Test already bags him the gloves: Gilchrists astonishingly school-boyish and ham-fisted work behind the stumps precludes his selection, whereas Read has looked a class (or more) above than even the very best of Gilchrist (who currently loses out to Jones on glovework).

With one Test to go, Lee has clearly made a late bid for recognition with his first decent bowling performace in nine Ashes Tests.... but it seems to me that with one Test to go... two spots in particular remain very much up for grabs.
Gilchrist:PERTH

Lee: Did not do much when the series was alive so I would keep Hoggart.

Openers:Strauss has had some shocking decisions,Bell has looked good but Langers two Brisbane knocks set the tone for the entire series IMO.Hayden made a good 92 in Perth.
__________________
" You don't want the truth,you can't handle the truth."

Last edited by Ernest : 28-12-2006 at 08:34 PM. Reason: Use of full quote
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 29-12-2006, 08:20 AM in reply to KennyG's post starting "Gilchrist:PERTH Lee: Did not do much..."
gibbs_fan's Avatar
gibbs_fan gibbs_fan is offline
(AUS) Passed Clarrie Grimmett's 557 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cape Town
My main national team: South Africa
My other team/s: India
Posts: 569
Well, seeing that the score is 4-0 and England have been demolished within 3 days, I would have to say that the combined_XI should be the Australian_XI.

Seriously though, I think that Lee could be replaced by Hoggard and Symonds can be replaced by Pietersen. Perhaps Gilchrist can be replaced by Read( Gilly has forgotton how to catch the ball). As for the rest, its all AUstralian.
__________________
434, world record for the shortest period. Whos choking now?
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 29-12-2006, 10:51 PM in reply to greg's post starting "With such a strong batting line up you..."
andain's Avatar
andain andain is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Melbourne
My main national team: Australia
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg
With such a strong batting line up you don't need Flintoff and Hoggard has outbowled him so should take that place.You can't really argue about the rest of the side though.
What would be the point of picking Hoggard in a side containing McGrath and Warne who both can bowl long spells similar to Hoggard and are more damaging during those spells? And then you have Clarke who's a line and length bowler. Lee is meant to be the balance, the difference in the Australian pace attack to give it a bit of variety. Hoggard replacing Lee eliminates that variety. With Flintoff at least you have an impact bowler. When you consider replacing Lee with an English bowler for the purposes of this exercise, with the rest of the bowling attack Australian, you're debating the relative merits of Lee, Flintoff and Harmison. Hoggard doesn't come into the equation.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 29-12-2006, 11:06 PM in reply to andain's post starting "What would be the point of picking..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,829
Lee has not actually warranted a place in a combined second Xi until this most recent match: his batting has looked better than his quite appalling bowling. I'll concede that he finally got his act together somewhat for the fourth Test... but in truth he should have been dropped long before that game (and can presumably thank the impending retirement of McGrath and lack of experience of Johnson for his opportunity to play at Melbourne).

I do partially accept that Hoggard would be out of place alongside McGrath and Clark: all three are clearly new-ball bowlers and whilst all can do a job with the older ball... none could be considered old-ball specialists. That said.... all three are just so much superior to Lee that he'd not even enter the reckoning for me.
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02 PM.

Page generated in 0.684 seconds (60.51% PHP - 39.49% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0