Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > International Test Cricket
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

International Test Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general cricket issues, women's Test cricket and First-class matches involving Associate and Affiliate members.

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 13-12-2006, 10:19 AM in reply to SixandOut's post starting "Hindsight is a wonderful thing..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,606
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by SixandOut
Hindsight is a wonderful thing
Forsight was needed by the selectors, not hindsight - with hindight it's as a rule to late.
__________________
Ern
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 13-12-2006, 10:32 AM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Forsight was needed by the selectors,..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,352
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest
Forsight was needed by the selectors, not hindsight - with hindight it's as a rule to late.
Yes but it is only with hindsight that you can tell that the selectors showed a lack of foresight. Foresight is vague, while hindsight is certain, so i would always put more faith in using hindsight as opposed to foresight.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 14-12-2006, 10:36 AM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Yes but it is only with hindsight that..."
greg's Avatar
greg greg is offline
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
WAT England A Selector-2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(NZ-captain) Passed John Wright's 5334 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salop/England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,338
Are we not allowed the excuse that our coach is a numptie?

He was shown up totally today by Panesar and the shame is that it has come too late to make much difference in the series thanks to said coach being so pigheaded with his selection.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 14-12-2006, 12:59 PM in reply to greg's post starting "Are we not allowed the excuse that our..."
SixandOut SixandOut is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sixandout.net
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Hampshire, Guernsey
Posts: 75
Send a message via Yahoo to SixandOut
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg
Are we not allowed the excuse that our coach is a numptie?

He was shown up totally today by Panesar and the shame is that it has come too late to make much difference in the series thanks to said coach being so pigheaded with his selection.
I agree in principle, but Fletcher could quite easily have given Harmison the chop. Instead he maintained confidence in him and Steve was as important in today's bowling.
__________________
Six and Out: Fine cricket journalism: http://www.sixandout.net/
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 14-12-2006, 01:06 PM in reply to greg's post starting "Are we not allowed the excuse that our..."
Paoli's Avatar
Paoli Paoli is offline
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Newcastle United
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg
Are we not allowed the excuse that our coach is a numptie?

He was shown up totally today by Panesar and the shame is that it has come too late to make much difference in the series thanks to said coach being so pigheaded with his selection.
No. 18 months ago Fletcher was god's right hand man, now he's a numptie?! Make up yer minds!

Milo was on the money I think- you aren't good enough. Fair enough, missing Jones is a big one. Vaughan's not so big imo. Since he became captain he hadn't batted well at all. So it's fair to say you guys haven't had the right build up, but still, the reasons why you won last year, we could make excuses for. McGrath missing in Test 2 which you won, Fred single handedly won test 4 for you. If England win this one, makes it more interesting by the time we get To Melbourne.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 14-12-2006, 03:00 PM in reply to Paoli's post starting "No. 18 months ago Fletcher was god's..."
cantplaycantalk cantplaycantalk is offline
(PAK) Passed Abdul Qadir's 1029 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
My main national team: I support more than one national team
My other team/s: Durham, England, West Indies
Posts: 1,032
Well you can call it excuses when you expect to win 5-0 before the start and end up losing.

But one thing ALL you gloating Aussies should look back through the posts and realise is.
Most of the England fans had already said that we expected to come out second best in this tour.
We knew before the start that we were going into this without S Jones or Vaughan, with Harmison and Flintoff undercooked and recovering from injury, with Tresco's fruit and nut on a christmas special and almost worse than all this we were taking both GO Jones and Giles, of those two Giles has been a good servant to England down the years but he never was good enough to come back from a year long injury into the England side and his batting is only up to standard vs 2nd class attacks. GOJO is just not international standard.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 18-12-2006, 09:42 AM in reply to cantplaycantalk's post starting "Well you can call it excuses when you..."
butchering lee butchering lee is offline
(SA) Passed Allan Donald's 652 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 654
the biggest excuse is absentees (particularly those from the last series):



flintoff

strauss

vaughan

Harmison

S jones

giles

GoJo

nor tresco....played a game this ashes.

England have LOADS of potential, but were i an England fan (and believe me noone can empathise more) i'd be very worried about the 4th innings of the second test.

nice job OZ!!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 18-12-2006, 09:46 AM in reply to Nazza's post starting "All hail Sir Milo. When will people..."
butchering lee butchering lee is offline
(SA) Passed Allan Donald's 652 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nazza

When will people finally understand that we got lucky last summer................yes, we played well but it took the Aussies to (collectively) forget how to bat in those conditions .
and bowl (bar warne)
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 18-12-2006, 09:50 AM in reply to Milo's post starting "Here's the excuses/reasons Quagmire. ..."
butchering lee butchering lee is offline
(SA) Passed Allan Donald's 652 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milo

1) The bowlers are not good enough to bowl Australia out twice on Australian pitches.

2 The batsmen are not good enough to put together two good innings against (an Australian attack/Warne) ... Even if you look at the last Ashes series, England struggled to bat well in both innings.
1) - i think this one is arguable (though since the last ashes finished this is an accurate assessment of the english attack) - and in this series they certainly won't do it for less runs than England will make, if at all.

2) - evidently

Last edited by butchering lee : 18-12-2006 at 10:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 18-12-2006, 09:52 AM in reply to butchering lee's post starting "and bowl (bar warne)"
Teatime FatCat's Avatar
Teatime FatCat Teatime FatCat is offline
WAT selector - Zimbabwe A 2005
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chertsey - Home of Cricket
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Middx / The Mighty Chertsey 3rdXI
Posts: 1,731
I have no problems with this - best XI picked for each test won. The Aussies were simply better this time, and well done to them.


What I do have an issue with is that Fletcher has not become a bad coach over night, I think he and others have managed this series very badly.

The picking of Giles and Gojo is a shocker

Not enough prep

Allowing Troy Cooley to leave

Allowing Tresco to come on tour


NOTE:- These are not excuses, it merely disappoints me that all of these things should have been sorted out for the most important tour in the last 20 years.

VV annoyed!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
I'll have the Mouseburger please, with a side of Goldfish.
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43 PM.

Page generated in 0.524 seconds (67.73% PHP - 32.27% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0