| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| International Test Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general cricket issues, women's Test cricket and First-class matches involving Associate and Affiliate members. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Mr Hutt - you are inded an optimist, and I am going to join you ---BUT I read:- Quote:
I also believe that Fletcher has the last say on who is in the side in any case. I can't see England winning with an unchanged team, I can't see Panersar alone making any difference at all, it's been obvious that England NEED a pace bowler to partner Flintoff. Mahmood +Plunkett - or Mahmood+panesar could give australia a shock. Details click here
__________________ Ern |
| |||
| Much better balanced side the Aussies have picked. I think no Martyn is defenite plus. I know Symond's hasn't performed at Test level but they could not go on with Martyn. As for England their big chance was missed in the last Test. MCgrath wasn't fully fit and there were three other bowlers only. This time the task is bigger than last they don't know which way the toss will go, last time they won it and got a great start against an attack that had seen better days. The first thing is to win the toss if they don't the incline will increase. I don't think it matters that much the team selection but key players will have to up their game.
__________________ "Checkout the big brain on Brett" Pulp Fiction |
| |||
| Ernest, I think Flintoff, not fletcher, will have the final say on who he picks. Fred has form in the "not-bowling Panesar when he has been foisted on him" category. And, certainly in Hussain's and vaughan's touring days, Captain always got the final say. I know Fred and Fletch are not close, but i would imagine you would have to go with the captain's pick, purely because, like in Athers and stewie's day, they simply will refuse to bowl the guy they didnt want. For what it's worth i would have Mahmood, read and monty in, for Jones, Gilo and anderson. |
| | |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
| | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I agree with the 3 changes you have made, had England started with those three - England MAY not have been two matches down at this stage.
__________________ Ern Last edited by Ernest : 14-12-2006 at 12:13 AM. |
| ||||
| 7:27 Am just doing the preleminary interviews here..... match starts soon Flitoff lost the toss and bowls.. Monty and Saj are in.. Jimmy and Giles out... about ****ing time too. This is it.. now or never!!! Does any1 else feels this is the side that should have walked out at brisbane from england... yaaaaaaaaaaaaah
__________________ |
| ||||
| Yep totally agree there Mr Hutt.Probably too late but i hope we give it a go.Might be a good toss to lose on a STRANGE looking pitch. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Near as it can be the the best England side on offer.
__________________ Ern |
| ||||
| Australia off to a flyer 27-0 already. Here we go again. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |