Quote:
|
Originally Posted by butchering lee it is indeed a fact ... and nothing has changed except the fact that 99% of bowlers have been found to flex as much - or (often) more - so it is now legal and no longer a throw but a delivery. |
Hang on, 99% of bowlers flex as much as Murali?? I really dont think so, I would say 99% of bowlers flex less than 5 degrees.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by butchering lee what is the current climate exactly?? a number of bowlers have beeen banned for throwing in recent times.
which is a comment on your second comment - it's only one match (and most cases - like kirtley or botha not necessarily match winning performances - lawson may be the one exception and look what happened to him), it's by no means pointless and flauting such laws will, if recent experience is an indicator, cost you at the very minimum time out of your career if not your career. if science clears you - get back to wicket taking and good on ya
chuck at your peril - you will be reported and tested ...banned, told to sort it or cleared. |
I dont think you understand my reasoning. ANY bowler could throw in a game, deliberately or not, and the worst that could happen is he would be reported and he would then have to undergo biometric testing. If that bowler then bowled "normally" they would pass the biometric testing and be cleared. Granted if a bowler ket on being reported, he would get banned, but if he got cleared a couple of times he wouldnt get reported any more. i.e Murali.
In the cases of Lawson, Botha and Kirtley is was obvious to the
naked eye that they had terrible actions. They got banned because they failed biometric testing, NOT becasue they had been reported. If they had passed the testing they would be able to carry on bowling.