Acker,
I love most of your comments on here, particularly your genuine interest in English cricket, but I found this thread to be very condescending and even patronising.
The fact is that you ignore the fact that we do send players away (often to Lilliee School in India) and many of our players already play Grade cricket (but not First Class Cricket - the Aussies are more sensible than to our allow our players a breeding ground - unlike us who will happily select an Aussie quick over a home grown one any day!!)
It is not as if England is the only country failing to produce quality young bowlers - IMO their is a dearth of talent world wide, and it is not as if there are so many Australian quicks out there, in their early twenties, ready to replace McGrath, or give Lee any cause to look over his shoulder?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by acker And it's not just bowlers I relate this to, it's borderline batsmen as well. If they are not in the England touring squad surely it is more beneficial that they are playing in Australia during the England winter. And if they perform exceptionally well I am sure they will gravitate to the "state" squad much the same as our players gravitate to the "county" squad. |
We do send players to Australia, but the chances are a state side would not pick them, because they don't really use overseas players. They certainly aren't in any hurry to give a leg up to English players - or from other nations.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by acker The likes of Ricky Ponting have not been made on his personal sheer ability alone. Ponting has been developed within a "MacDonald's Restaurant" like type franchise training system, along with Adam Gilchrist, Michael Clarke and others.
England has had access to the ground floor of this process. Because it was basically engineered by Rodney Marsh |
.
We have an Academy set up by Rod Marsh, and it is probably producing more Test players than it's Australian equivalent. We also send players to India for specialist training. Would the Australians really give us access to their academy, I doubt it!! So we have to make the most of ours.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by acker But England got a shorter schooling in the basics, and unfortunately donated to much time in monarchical type arguments about captaincy rather than concentrating on balance of the team.
England does have the opportunity to rectify this. |
I imagine that the debate on team selection and the captaincy that occurs on here is not reflective of the thinking of Moores, who probably had a better idea of his first XI than we do.
As it is I do find it highly condescending to suggest that our "problems" could be solved by Australia alone, we have a very good infrastructure, generally, we just need to make better use of, yes we do need to get our quick players used to other conditions, but that includes the sub-continent as well as the Australian conditions.