Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Good question - the India experiment shows that without a head coach the team must bear most of the responsibility for their performance. That might actually mentally focus them to perform to the best of their ability. I can't see why a team can't prepare themselves with the aid of skills coaches and support staff. Players usually underperform due to a flaw in their technique. A skills coach is all that is needed to iron out these kind of problems. I don't see a need for a head coach except to help with analyzing the opposition and to suggest strategies to counter them. |
Yes but you do have to compare the experience (and quality) of this Indian side to the current shambles of the West Indies side. Now I agree that players like Dravid, Tendulkar, Kumble, Ganguly, Laxman and even Zaheer Khan who form the spine of the team don't need any great imput from on high however I wouldn't trust the likes of Gayle, Morton, Samuels and co to work things out all by themselves. They need a very hands on domineering personality (Fletcher would be ideal in this role but he's unfortunately for the Windies waiting for either a plum county role or the South Africa job) to drag them into line and not tolerate their indiscipline and total lack of application. They also need someone who is big enough to overule some of the more moronic picks (or Darren Ganga as he's more commonly known) from their truely incompetent band of selectors.
In terms of India they may well get away with their current coaching situation for the time being but when some of the big names start calling it a day in the next year or two and holes start appearing throughout the side then they will need that proven head coach to ease the next generation of talented but raw youngsters into the international fold.