Quote:
Originally Posted by pie_chucker Harmison is motivated to play for England and he will be a better pick over the next three years than the likes of Broad, Tremlett, Anderson |
If he regains his form and confidence then I agree with you 100%, a fit Harmison is worth his place in any side.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pie_chucker The problem with Harmison is that since the 2005 ashes series he's never been fully fit. |
Yea - frustrating, the same with Simon Jones and Flintoff, and for the batting - no player has shown he can fill Trescothick's boots'
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pie_chucker To me Anderson has shown he shouldnt be considered for any more tests unless we are playing a 5 man attack he's just too unreliable and always liable to go at 4-6 an over. |
Agreed - then I have always advocated that England play their best with a 5 man bowling attack - this allows individual players to have bad days.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pie_chucker If Broad is to play then Sidebottom must go[...] a genuine paceman must play. |
Exactly right - there is not room for the both of them IMO.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pie_chucker (fair enough they had no choice in that series) but the selectors have tried 3 medium pacers against SL and they will lose again, {{dont they learn}}. Especially as Englands only bowler of pace, Flintoff caused India problems in the ODI's[...] and Lee caused Sri Lanka problems whereas the likes of Clark posed no threat. |
Good points - no they don't learn, in fact the selectors have hit new lows since the 5-0 drubbing in 2006 against Australia - medium pacers alone will never win test series on subcontinental, or any wickets for that matter.