| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| International Test Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general cricket issues, women's Test cricket and First-class matches involving Associate and Affiliate members. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| England v Pakistan - The Oval Test - Result under appeal In this turbulent week, I am almost reluctant to post this, but it is a legitimate story and it is a point for discussion, I suppose. Pakistan's board has asked for the result of the test match (England won by forfeit) to be changed to a draw or "Match abandoned". See BBC report here. There are no official comments, but there is an unofficial one that the ECB has supported the plea. Now, if this is not a blatant attempt to re-write history, I'm a Dutchman. Message to PCB: can we PLEASE move on. Message to ECB: is this true?
__________________ Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy. Spike Milligan |
| | |||
| |||
| I'll be clearer then: PCB - forget this idiotic appeal. The result is known; the record books are clear; and there are thousands of pages of websites which report what happened. Re-writing history was always difficult, even for Stalin. Now it's impossible.
__________________ Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy. Spike Milligan |
| | ||||
| ||||
| This appeal is even sillier than Lewis Hamilton trying to win the F1 Driver's Campionship through the back door while all the time claiming that he was not interested. ![]() |
| | |||
| |||
| I don't agree with what they did then, and i don't necessarily agree with changing results. Bad precedent, and we have already had enough of them in the last week That said, It's probably a matter of honor for Pakistan. England still win the series 2-0 (they were not going to win the forfeited game in any case) So if it creates some goodwill, and if England agree (which is a must IMO) then so be it. I say that England must agree for a reason. Both parties should agree, lest some other nation try the same tact when they feel that they have been hard done by by umpiring decisions.
__________________ |
| ||||
| Quote:
The England team did nothing wrong, there remains doubts about Hair being right or wrong - to bring this up at the same time as the Indo/Aus row IMO seems to put it nicely - strange. Your link would not work OF, so I am posting another BBC SPORT | Cricket | Pakistan seek Oval result change To the PCB - yes Pakistan would have won that match - but Inzi pulled out, does it really matter if the result was 1-0 or 2-0, lets put this to sleep NOW.
__________________ Ern |
| |||
| The only way to but this to bed if for England to agree, i am afraid. I don't like it, but in the current environment....... England were never going to win that one, so that should make it all easier to swallow
__________________ |
| ||||
| If true, this is first-rate nonsense from the PCB (and the ECB too, for going along with it). The contest was decided on the field, correctly, according to the laws governing that particular match - any other result would be a farce.
__________________ A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes Mark Twain |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
You have it in one Maranello. What next, the Australians trying to get the 1932-33 Ashes series result annulled because Leg Theory has since been outlawed
__________________ Mark. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Again England were never going to win that match by a mile, but then again Pakistan were never going to win the series, so what differerence would changing the result make. England won that game fair and and square - even though Pakistan were the better side in that match, to overturn that result is setting a dangerous precident - and shame of the ECB for going along with it.
__________________ Ern |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |