| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Who will win the Ashes? | |||
| Australia | | 18 | 56.25% |
| England | | 14 | 43.75% |
| It will be a Draw | | 0 | 0% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| I've just finished reading Lawrence Booth's latest Spin, and he's very right about Kevin Pietersen aka: You-Know-Who, Bam Bam, KP, 600 and God knows what not. Whether you hate this guy or love him you just can't seem to ignore him. I was inclined to read his interview to Brian Viner in the Independent (appeared yeseterday). If you already love KP, this article will make you love him more, and if you dislike him, it will probably make you dislike him even more. In any case, a link is as follows: http://news.independent.co.uk/people...p?story=636882 Quote:
And some more news for everyone to reflect on, Shane Warne is in the news again...the latest swipe at England's Ashes prospects come by virtue of writing off the threat posed by Andrew Strauss, whose disappointing start to the season continued at the Rose Bowl yesterday. Strauss could only make 19 in Middlesex's second innings, before being bowled by Warne to precipitate a 64-run defeat, which took his tally for the season to a paltry 81 runs from six innings. Quote:
Last edited by Zainub : 10-05-2005 at 03:01 PM. Reason: removing grammatical(sp?) errors |
| |||
| Who are these batsmen that have been dominated by Australia? What pills Warney been taking now, eh? |
| |||
| I know Thorpe is in pretty horrendous form at the moment (there is talk that his eyesight has gone), but I will be very happy if he performs to the standard of his previous performances against the Aussies (over 1200 runs at 46). Warne may have taken his wicket 9 times, but his scores at the time of those dismissals were 60, 28, 67, 51, 26, 123, 3, 7, 53. Should be a good contest. |
| |||
| Actually he said batters and not batsmen But seriously, I actually consider this to be a straight forward swipe by KP at Thorpey...indirectly he's probably saying ...Thropey's too old ...drop him..and pick me Last edited by Zainub : 10-05-2005 at 02:40 PM. |
| |||
| batters, batsmen, all the same to me |
| |||
| Just that I've got the OF pendenticity (is that a word OF Last edited by Zainub : 10-05-2005 at 02:51 PM. |
| ||||
| Dear God! Why can't we just ignore what the Aussie players have to say and just get on with it. Let's be honest, for the first test against Bangladesh, our side will probably be - Stauss, Tresco, Vaughn, Thorpe, Bell, Flintoff, Jones, Gilo, Hoggy, Jones, Harmy The only question mark there is whether Freddy will play as a batter, if not KP will probably get the spot. Key will feel hard done by I'm sure, but Bell offers little wobbly seamers and great fielding. In any case, there's one slot up for grabs, and it's got Bell, Key, KP and Collingwood up for it. If we were all to be really honest, Collingwood will slot into the one day side. No-one is really convinced by Key, so it's a straight race between KP and Bell, which KP is currently losing on form. Thorpey would have to have an atrocious series against the Bango's to be dropped.
__________________ I'll have the Mouseburger please, with a side of Goldfish. |
| | |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
| |||
| Quote:
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |