| | |
![]() | |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Tourists throw a wobbly over 'chuckers' http://www.theage.com.au/news/cricke...143848159.html I've said before that I think England are going beyond competative and right into rude and ungamely. Quote:
__________________ It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them! Nietzsche |
| | ||||
| ||||
| No mate, you are wrong. The Aussies play hard, but fair. If relations become strained between the teams, that will only play into the Aussies hands - they have mental strength which is why they are so far better than any other team in the world. After that incident, how did the two captains play? Ponting put in a gutsy 40 odd, Vaughan put in a limp wristed nothing. No point talking the talk if you can't walk the walk. Would expect more from an English captain and team.
__________________ The thought police are everywhere.............. |
| | |||
| |||
| I don't see what the problem is. No one forced Ponting or Hayden to take on a mistimed pull, Langer turned his head away from the ball. If the Aussies don't like getting hit in when playing cricket, they'd better get out of the team and find someone who does. Brett Lee doesn't let up with his short balls and so he shouldn't. It is a game, yes! But part of the game is to knock the opposing captain's head off with a legal ball. If Ponting wants some sympathy next time he'd better duck the short ones and not attempt a poorly timed stroke.
__________________ Whatever your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you mine are far greater! Albert Einstein, 1879-1955 |
| | |||
| |||
| At least England are trying to knock the Aussies out the legal way, rather than the Brett Lee "Beamer" way. Ask the Kiwi keeper what he thinks of them!! |
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| |||
| Quote:
|
| |||
| I'm having some trouble understanding this. From the newspaper article, the problem seems to be that England's fielders are returning the ball to the middle in an unnecessarily aggressive manner. The complaint is not against batsmen being hit by bowlers, but against them being hit by fielders (who happen to be bowlers). Is that right? If so, then I take no offence at the "chucking" term - it's only offensive if used against a bowler who is bowling (legally) - but it does muddy the waters a bit and the sub-editor who wrote the headline should talk to his cricket correspondent before writing another one. Now, if my assumption is correct, and balls are being hurled back to the centre after the batsmen have stopped running and while they are in their ground, then the Aussies seem to me to have at least some part of a case. If you hit a batsman who is harmlessly in his ground with a return throw, seems to me that at least some acknowledgement of your error is due, which might take the form of "Sorry, mate - you OK?". On the other hand, it's a man's game we are talking about here, and the expression about mountains and molehills might well be in point. If, as is suggested, Stephen Harmison roughed up three Aussies like this, then Michael Vaughan ought to be telling him to cool it before he gets reported for a level two Code of Conduct violation.
__________________ Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy. Spike Milligan |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |