Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > International Test Cricket > ITC Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

View Poll Results: Should the Edgbaston groundsman be shot?
Yes 2 6.45%
No 29 93.55%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2005, 10:06 PM in reply to Lemming's post starting "Just because he steps outside his..."
nealN's Avatar
nealN nealN is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester at home... Sheffield at Uni...
My other team/s: Lancashire and England
Posts: 31
23-1 now... Almost as one sided as the kind of bowler dominated cricket Rachael would seemingly like to watch!
__________________
Sale Sharks - European Challenge Cup Winners 2004/05
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 02:20 AM in reply to Lemming's post starting "Just because he steps outside his..."
Leafy Seadragon Leafy Seadragon is offline
(ENG) Passed Angus Fraser's 388 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 387
I'd agree with your comments if he had kept his eyes open during all of them. Having said that, he played the right way at the right time. No criticism of his batting, just wouldn't suggest it was good technique
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 16-12-2005, 02:21 AM in reply to Rachael's post "Shoot the groundsman... or just give up..."
mianfeinān mianfeinān is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Carlton/Melbourne/Australia
Posts: 2
A whole issue that people have completely forgot

In the 2001 Wisden Cricketers' Almanac, David Green produced an excellent article about pitch preparation in which he shows that, from one-day cricket and counties' financial considerations, though they sound remote from the issue, are the root of the reason for complaints about pitches today.

Whilst I do admit I am being rather simplistic, Green shows that many of the complaints about standards of pitches relate to the tendency during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s to prepare pitches to suit short of a length seam bowlers, which most writers in England believe (and none I have read overseas totally deny) and efforts by the authorities to establish extremely flat pitches as the norm for all first-class games.

Green shows that, in England, this has led to a serious decline in batting techniques. Whilst my ultra-sceptical, even cynical brother denies this, looking at someone like Brian Lara who has trouble when pitches give bowlers any help does make me think that batsmen of today are spoilt. As someone with a great knowledge of cricket history, I tend today to believe that the real solution, no matter how unacceptable it would undoubtedly be to authorities who emphasise one-day cricket so much, is to restrict or eliminate covering of pitches.

This would surely not only require much better technique from batsmen, but also eliminate much of the danger in cricket today because the incentive to intimidate rather than try to dismiss batsmen that covered pitches have been shown over the last forty-five years to bring would be eliminated when the elements are able to give bowlers more of a chance. Uncovering pitches would also eliminate much of the incentive for time wasting (again, it relates to intimidating batsmen) that has largely taken crowds away from Test cricket. In good weather, too, uncovered pitches were much faster than covered pitches and allowed for much freer scoring as well as giving the faster bowlers a chance.

Also, uncovered pitches would reduce a cricket authority's medical bill because the amount of wear and tear on players in much less.

There are two main problems with uncovering pitches:
- delays due to drying can mean little play after rain for some time. I do believe soil scientists today could certainly solve this quite easly, though
- outside England and New Zealand, much older soils mean uncovered pitches are both much more physically dangerous to batsmen and also likely to produce conditions under which the team that plays best does not win because of rain altering a pitch.

Nonetheless, all cricket watchers and authorities in England and New Zealand (and, perhaps, even elsewhere) really ought even today about whether covering of pitches serves to reduce the ability of Test cricket to draw crowds and compete with other sports.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:42 PM.

Page generated in 0.415 seconds (47.70% PHP - 52.30% MySQL) with 14 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0