Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > International Test Cricket > ITC Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 09:43 AM in reply to Collyisamackem's post starting "Anybody else think we should pick..."
greg's Avatar
greg greg is offline
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
WAT England A Selector-2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(NZ-captain) Passed John Wright's 5334 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salop/England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,338
Certainly when Durham have no game that week he should be.But i would like him to play for Durham when possible because i think he is next in line for a call up should there be an injury or team change.Good point though.
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 10:25 AM in reply to greg's post starting "But if the roles were reversed and we..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg
But if the roles were reversed and we had a record similar to what the Aussies have at Lords at say Adelaide the ACB would drop it from the schedule and use Hobart.Just because it's Lords doesn't make it a special case in my opinion.
I know what you mean, Greg, but in this case tradition is always going to outweigh logic. Fact is that there are international players all over the world who would give their eye teeth to play at the self-styled "Home of Cricket". Maybe we could drop Lord's and invite them to Hambledon instead ... ?
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 10:34 AM in reply to greg's post starting "But if the roles were reversed and we..."
Wiljoy Wiljoy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Adelaide South Australia
My other team/s: Yorkshire & South Australia
Posts: 70
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by greg
But if the roles were reversed and we had a record similar to what the Aussies have at Lords at say Adelaide the ACB would drop it from the schedule and use Hobart.Just because it's Lords doesn't make it a special case in my opinion.
Asking to drop the Lords Test in England,is Just like asking to drop the test match at the MCG, NEVER in 1,000,000. years, why? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
__________________
Just remind me,who holds the ashes now?


When England say "it's only a game" they are always loosing
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 10:35 AM in reply to Wiljoy's post starting "Asking to drop the Lords Test in..."
greg's Avatar
greg greg is offline
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
WAT England A Selector-2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(NZ-captain) Passed John Wright's 5334 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salop/England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,338
Because we never win there.Why give the opposition a penalty kick to go ahead in a series.We should play to our strengths.Lords is not a strength for us v Australia.
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 10:54 AM in reply to greg's post starting "Because we never win there.Why give the..."
English_Al English_Al is offline
(AUS) Passed Damien Fleming's 305 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Norfolk, England
My main national team: England
Posts: 334
I agree with the others Greg, Lords is the most significant ground in the world, it will never be dropped however badly England play there. It's just a real bummer that Australia (particularly McGrath) seem to go so well there.

Talking of McGrath I've noticed in recent times just how much Australia rely on McGrath and Warne - and in these last two tests it's been their magic bowling that has turned the game on its head above anything else. I think the talk of them being an old spent force was totally rubbish, I reckon they are almost as good now as they've ever been. They also allow the batsmen to play with so much freedom and confidence. When they retire I think it will be like it was for the W.Indies when they lost Ambrose and Walsh, Australia will become a good side rather than the great one they have been.
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 11:03 AM in reply to English_Al's post starting "I agree with the others Greg, Lords is..."
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(NZ-captain) Passed Ken Rutherford's 2465 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,477
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
I don't think we give Gillespie and Kasprowicz enough credit. McGrath was injured for a year, coinciding with when Warne was suspended. Australia still defeated all comers with Gillespie and Kasper providing a significant cutting edge. What the Aussies are finding at the moment is that Gilly and Kasper are out of form and McGrath injured all at the same time. Once/if Gilly and Kasper find their form, they will show that they are top class bowlers. Write them off at your peril!

Also, this talk of Lords being a bad ground for England is superstitious mumbo-jumbo (great word!). If England had played well throughout the Lords test and kept their concentration, it would have been a lot closer. When England have a better team than the oppo, they can win at Lords. We won twice there last year! This talk of Lords being a bad hunting ground for England is just another line of spin from a media anxious to find something to talk about.
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 12:50 PM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "I don't think we give Gillespie and..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,500
I may be wrong, Andy, but I think Greg was talking in the context of matches against Australia - and we haven't beaten them at Lord's since 1934.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 12:53 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "I may be wrong, Andy, but I think Greg..."
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(NZ-captain) Passed Ken Rutherford's 2465 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,477
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasional Fan
I may be wrong, Andy, but I think Greg was talking in the context of matches against Australia - and we haven't beaten them at Lord's since 1934.
I'm sure he was, but I'm saying that it shouldn't be relevant. There's no reason why we can't beat them at Lords. They aren't allowed to field extra players there!!! McGrath just made better use of the slope than the English seamers. When the English seamers are as accurate as McGrath - if they get there - then they'll be able to make similar use of it and will give the Aussies more of a game. Don't remove Lords from the Ashes calendar on a superstition or history of losses. You never know which year the end of that losing streak will come. It could have been this year.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 12:58 PM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "I'm sure he was, but I'm saying that it..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,500
Australia's side

Selectors meet later today, Monday. According to this report from the BBC, the Aussies are considering calling up all-rounder, Shane Watson. Glenn McGrath is not expected to make it back in time for Old Trafford, but Ricky Ponting says it is realistic to expect him back at Trent Bridge, where the fourth test starts on 25 August. No problems are expected for Brett Lee, however, who is expected to play on Thursday.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 01:00 PM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "I'm sure he was, but I'm saying that it..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Mellon
Don't remove Lords from the Ashes calendar on a superstition or history of losses. You never know which year the end of that losing streak will come. It could have been this year.
I agree completely - but, as I have suggested above, the whole discussion is pretty academic. No-one is going to tour without getting a test match at Lord's.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38 PM.

Page generated in 0.532 seconds (69.05% PHP - 30.95% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0