| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | ||||
| | ||||
| we should be playing as England, not great britain
__________________ ‘With pride in our hearts, we play it together And we live for the crack of willow on leather' |
| | |||
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ Whatever your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you mine are far greater! Albert Einstein, 1879-1955 |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| | |||
| |||
| Hmm, in some cases it's fairly blatant (Pietersen), in others like the guys mentioned here it's such a grey area. Though it does seem as though England have had the most controversy in this area, has anyone else noticed this? For example, look at all the other cricketing nations, how many 'foreign' players have they got? Wonder why this is... |
| | |||
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ |
| |||
| I don't think it has that much to do with the strength/weakness of the county system. It seems to me that the true 'foreigners' (that is say, those who do not have an English/Welsh parent or grandparent) who have represented England have been largely drawn from SA and Zim. During the 80s SA was banned from the Test arena and Zim didn't have test status and accordingly some very decent players decided to py their trade in England (where there are more professional cricketers than anywhere else) and were good enough (once qualified) to get in the test side. It might therefore be nothing more than historical accident. In addition, whilst state cricket in Australia is generally accepted as having the highest standard of the domestic competitions of the various test nations I would find it difficult to accept that any of the other domestic competitions around the world are as tough as the County Championship. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Steven |
| | |||
| |||
| Who decides? I am still confused. Who decides when a sporting team represents Great Britain or its' constituent parts? I am familiar with England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland each having their own team in competitions such as the World Cup, Five Nations and Commonwealth Games etc. I still haven't read a satisfactory answer as to why your representative cricket side plays under the banner of England when you look at personnel now (and in the past) that come from parts of the British Isles outside England. If a person doesn't want to represent Scotland in cricket, for example, does he have to complete residency qualifications in England? Please enlighten! |
| |||
| I suppose what you could say is that the England team should strictly be called 'Great Britain' and then there would be no problem if we wanted to call up either a Welsh or Scottish player. But cricket is a weird sport when it comes to representing nations, a good example is Rahul Dravid competing for Scotland in the National League division two. To play for England I would expect you need to show a British passport and you're away.
__________________ Whatever your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you mine are far greater! Albert Einstein, 1879-1955 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |