| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Lead is 390, time is running out and light is a potential issue this evening, which means time is even shorter than it appears. Surely time to come in now. Especially with Flintoff now out. There is no point wasting further time with the bat! Come on, Michael! There are 50 minutes play maximum today if you take off the innings change. We can use them! This just drives me mad! Every minute is precious and we simply do not need the 400+ margin which we now have! Get off!
__________________ Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy. Spike Milligan Last edited by Occasional Fan : 14-08-2005 at 04:34 PM. |
| | |||
| |||
| Australia chasing 423 Finally! Just 39 minutes today, light permitting, plus 83 overs tomorrow plus the final hour. Will it be enough?
__________________ Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy. Spike Milligan |
| |||
| England's day again, I'd say. A lot of work to do tomorrow to get 10 wickets, but surely within reach with a bit of luck and a following wind. Australia still have 399 to get in about 98 overs, which is not impossible, but my money wouldn't be on it. Tickets for Old Trafford tomorrow are a tenner a pop, cash only at the gate - Ern, I guess we won't be seeing you here tomorrow, right? If I were anywhere within about 100 miles of the ground, I'd be in the queue by now.
__________________ Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy. Spike Milligan |
| | |||
| |||
| Quote:
Warne - I thought - was unlucky to not get a wicket as he bowled well. McGrath picked up cheap wickets near the end when England were being aggressive, but he didn't deserve no wickets in the first innings. Good innings by Strauss, he showed a little of what he is capable of and deserved this century.
__________________ Whatever your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you mine are far greater! Albert Einstein, 1879-1955 |
| ||||
| I think England batted on maybe a little too long - it would have been better to set say 380 - 400 and declare. Still it is hard to judge a declaration, as no captin likes to left looking foolish if they get it wrong. A few more overs tonight might have given us a wicket.... Anyway, it was a good innings by Strauss, and Bell played well to. I think Trescothick was rather unfortunate, but all in all a good effort - you can't really critise Piterson or Flintoff, because today was all about getting runs and quickly. I hope England can do it tomorrow - I feel Giles will have a big say in things, because of all the left handers he'll be bowling too. If England do bowl well they should win, but beware the Aussie tail!!! |
| | |||
| |||
| I think Vaughany played it right. Plenty of runs ahead. He could have declared earlier, but, lets be realistic, this match is not sudden death. Dont take any risks. Yet |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Considering Australia like to ram home "the spirit of cricket" as often as they can i thought it was disgraceful of them to be bowling their overs so slowly,especially when Warne was bowling.If i was the match referee i would seriously consider banning the captain of any side who do this as it is clearly not in the spirit of the game. |
| |||
| Quote:
|
| | ||||
| ||||
| Kev,i would be just as disgusted if Vaughan did it if England were in the same position.For me it is worse than claiming a catch that might have been grounded because there is a conscious effort to disrupt the game. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |