Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > International Test Cricket > ITC Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 22-08-2005, 07:24 AM
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,568
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
4th Ashes Test: Trent Bridge, 25-29, August: Pre-Match Thread

Hi,
Sort of a deciding Test this at Tent Bridge, if England lose then they can't win the Ashes.
If Australia lose, then they can't win the series, but will still keep the Ashes with a win at the Oval.

A draw wil leave it all to play for at the Oval, after Old Trafford-what bet the draw?.

England have dominated this series up to now, even parts of the Lords Test, before they where thrashed.

Thing is, Australia can get better, can England?, well possible in the batting dept.

So who has the best chance of winning at Trent Bridge?.

Post your Pre Test Match Comments here please.

Thank's
__________________
Ern

Last edited by Ernest : 22-08-2005 at 11:32 AM.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 22-08-2005, 07:29 AM in reply to Ernest's post "4th Ashes Test: Trent Bridge, 25-29,..."
greg's Avatar
greg greg is offline
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
WAT England A Selector-2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(IND-captain) Passed Kapil Dev's 5248 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salop/England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,267
I think England will go in full of confidence and thinking they can win but Australia will come back hard in this game.Going to be very interesting to see who comes out on top.Just hope the weather doesn't interfere with the result this time.

We know what team England will pick but Australia have a dilemma for the back up seamer and maybe one batting slot.Are they brave enough to take a chance on Tait in such a huge match and will Katich or Hayden get the chop?One thing is certain Gillespie should only be on drinks duty this week.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 22-08-2005, 07:38 AM in reply to greg's post starting "I think England will go in full of..."
Beny's Avatar
Beny Beny is offline
WAT Australia A Selector 2004
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI-captain) Passed Jimmy Adams' 3012 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 3,027
Send a message via MSN to Beny
Quote:
England have dominated this series up to now, even parts of the Lords Test, before they where thrashed.
Ohh Please Ern... You got smashed at Lords. Nearly lost the un-loosable test at Edgbaston when we were minus McGrath, and drew the third test At Old Trafford...
__________________
It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them!
Nietzsche
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 22-08-2005, 07:39 AM in reply to Ernest's post "4th Ashes Test: Trent Bridge, 25-29,..."
Sean Beynon Sean Beynon is offline
 
Join Date: May 2004
My other team/s: England, Gloucestershire, Otago
Posts: 45
I would argue, quite strongly, that England hold the initiative in this series. That is not to say that the Aussies won't come back, of course. I think the nine day break will have helped England a great deal more than Australia. The whole team looked so gutted after Old Trafford that another back-to-back game looked like it would have been a bridge too far. With the break though, they will have had time to prepare mentally and physically for Thursday. They will almost certainly be unchanged for Trent Bridge - can anyone remember when England went through a whole Ashes series unchanged. Injuries in this Test aside, it may well happen.

Australia, on the other hand, can't have gained too much in the week. Some runs for Hayden, Clarke, Langer, Martyn and Katich are obviously good for them, but scoring runs against Wright, Phillips, Jones, Brown and Panesar is not an enormous achievement for international batsman.

It seems, above all, that the series hinges on reverse swing. If the Aussies can master playing it, and if either Tait or Lee can start bowling it accurately and at pace, it will be difficult for England. If the ball doesn't reverse much at TB, it is vital that Hoggard and Harmison bowl well. If on the other hand, the ball is zipping around all over the place and the Aussies still have no idea how to respond England will, finally, take back the Ashes.

Mind you, long range forecast is rubbish for Thursday and Friday. What odds a draw and a shoot-out at the Oval?
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 22-08-2005, 07:43 AM in reply to Sean Beynon's post starting "I would argue, quite strongly, that..."
Sean Beynon Sean Beynon is offline
 
Join Date: May 2004
My other team/s: England, Gloucestershire, Otago
Posts: 45
Oh, and the other thing which must be good for England - McGrath and Warne's ridiculous over confidence. McGrath suggesting England had blown it was typical of him, but it seems that the Australians are ratcheting up the mind-games because they are desperately worried that they are in danger of losing.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 22-08-2005, 08:01 AM in reply to Beny's post starting "Ohh Please Ern... You got smashed at..."
Trescothick's Avatar
Trescothick Trescothick is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Uxbridge, London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Bermuda
Posts: 654
Send a message via MSN to Trescothick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beny
Ohh Please Ern... You got smashed at Lords. Nearly lost the un-loosable test at Edgbaston when we were minus McGrath, and drew the third test At Old Trafford...
Although Ern was at one extreme, you have now responded to his comment with the other extreme!! I think its a lot closer than both of you two think...

England did well in the bowling department at Lords however were never really on top for a substantial passage of play.
Edgbaston it varied however England had the more dominating passages of play and did deserve to win
Old Trafford was close however again England again were on top for MOST. Aussies played well to claim their draw so a close match...

This next test is too close to call.. I think we're evenly poised bar Mcgrath and Warne we just have to play better that the rest of the team.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 22-08-2005, 08:27 AM in reply to Ernest's post "4th Ashes Test: Trent Bridge, 25-29,..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest
England have dominated this series up to now, even parts of the Lords Test, before they where thrashed.
Oh, I can face the world with a smile on my face having read that.

Side that's performed to date:

Langer
Clarke
Flintoff (bowling)
Warne (ball and bat)
McGrath (lords)
Jones (only when the ball's reverseing)

PPonting's been a one innings wonder... looking rank in between times... as have Vaughan and Strauss. Tresco's been exposed on technique and on temperament. Katich started well and has been struggling, as has Pietersen. Hayden's just been rubbish. Martyn's looked vulnerable but with signs of form. Both 'keepers have been ****. Gillespie's been a disaster. Kasprowicz was no better. Giles has been up and down. Lee has struggled.... and Hoggard might as well have been playing county cricket.

The question is... which team's actually going to actually start playing first: my guess is that one or the other will actually play 4-5-6 sessions in their first innings here.. and perhaps both... but I'm not going to bank on it!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 22-08-2005, 09:53 AM in reply to Rachael's post starting "Oh, I can face the world with a smile..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,568
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael
Oh, I can face the world with a smile on my face having read that.
The question is... which team's actually going to actually start playing first: my guess is that one or the other will actually play 4-5-6 sessions in their first innings here.. and perhaps both... but I'm not going to bank on it!
England did have some good sessions at Lords, with the ball.
The batting was rubbish, capitulating, helping McGrath get his wickets, any decent county attack would have bowled England out at Lords.
England dominated at Edgbaston, make no mistake about that, with tail ender coming to Australia's rescue, and it would not have gone down to 3 runs, had Simon Jones took that catch.

At Old Trafford, England bowled well enough to get 9 Aussie wickets on the last day, despite being handycapped having Hoggard in the team.

All credit to Australia for hanging on, but I thing had Chapple or keedy from Lancashire been bowling those last overs when our bowlers were knackered, it would have been a different tale, I bet a lot of members on this board could say the same.

England are still 1-1 despite loesing Thorpe, despite a skipper who has only made one real score, despite the handycap of Hoggard.
On those tracks where was Rob Key, what did you call him Rachael, a flat track bully.
__________________
Ern
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 22-08-2005, 10:03 AM in reply to Ernest's post starting "England did have some good sessions at..."
Collyisamackem's Avatar
Collyisamackem Collyisamackem is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chester, UK
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Somerset
Posts: 3,363
I think that, after doing so well in the first test but not taking many wickets in the last two, Harmy could be due a big performance. If he hits top form then he could be a matchwinner in what I reckon will be another tight one.


England to win, but Australia to play well and make us fight hard for it.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 22-08-2005, 09:30 PM in reply to Collyisamackem's post starting "I think that, after doing so well in..."
Pietersen24 Pietersen24 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, England
My other team/s: England and Lancashire (Family)
Posts: 6
Send a message via MSN to Pietersen24
Unhappy

Im worried about this test. Im worried this will be the test in which the Aussies fire on all cylinders and win the test
__________________
England - Ashes Winners 2005
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Page generated in 0.559 seconds (68.96% PHP - 31.04% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0