| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is the best choice for England Captain? | |||
| Michael Vaughan | | 5 | 33.33% |
| Freddy Flintoff | | 5 | 33.33% |
| Andy Strauss | | 4 | 26.67% |
| TTFC | | 3 | 20.00% |
| A safe pair of hands from county cricket? | | 0 | 0% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| I reckon they should sit Vaughan down in a chair at mid-on and let him captain the side. That is the only option for me, non of this pick the captain from the best, fit XI players rubbish.
__________________ Whatever your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you mine are far greater! Albert Einstein, 1879-1955 |
| |||
| Freedy: not shrewd enough, to pally with other players. Best bet to win something is to let him loose, not tie him down with captaincy. Strauss: Looses it under pressure. Tresco: Most expreienced, tough, closest in style to Vaughan. If not picked he might be another example of England managaments (read: Duncan Fletcher) stubbornes/incompetence to not pick/do the best for England. Here is an interesting one: KP: Extremly tough and shrewd. Expert at making the most of his abilities (something he will transfer to England). Pressure and responsibilty raises his game. He will probably not get it now because of lack of experience and "hollywood" factor. South Africa went down similar route when the appointed Greame Smith. I would rather see him than Strauss or Freddy. |
| |||
| I agree with the KP option, he would be great IMO. He is tough, arrogant and a good player - do the other players like him? If Vaughan isn't fit for the ashes i'd definately take him to help coach and captain from the boundary! |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Imagine how England's players must have felt when Flintoff in India suddenly sent all the fielders to the boundary, it doesn't exactly pass on a positive message if your captain is struggling to keep control. Not forgetting that Flintoff then chose to bowl himself even when he was probably nackered and struggling. This really doesn't help your bowlers' confidence levels does it? Vaughan on the field would have controlled the situation better, on the sidelines him shouting at Flintoff to put fielders back into orthodox positions would probably have been worse. He would have undermined the captain which really would have put a dampner on things for players. In jest or however it may appear, Vaughan should not interfere with things. He needs to get himself fit again! Back to our next captain: Trescothick - He might not even accept it if offered and would you really want to give the captaincy to someone who doesn't have the hunger for captaincy? Strauss - He's had rubbish bowling to work with, our supposed strenght, difficult to really judge until he gets a crucial point in a match where he needs to turn up the screws. Flintoff - He has too much on his plate but will probably be incorrectly given it. KP - It's an interesting name to throw in the hat but I feel his inexperience as a captain would be his down fall. His attitude is certainly up there though. TTFC - The classic choice, you would at least get the coaching side of things right! Last edited by Vrock : 30-06-2006 at 02:10 PM. |
| ||||
| Andrew Strauss is the man He has the hunger for captaincy and we have an ex-England skipper calling for him to play in the role also. Given all that is going on within the side it probably is the best call, Tresco was the only other wise-man's choice for the side and he doesn't want it as much. That hardly gives a great impression to your team mates.
__________________ Watch this for a perfect about. James May |
| |||
| Strauss seems like the most sensible option to me. Have never been impressed with Tres as a captain and the debacle in India didn't help. He's also England most consistent batsman (well maybe KP now) so just leave him to make the runs at the top of the order. Flintoff, like I've said all along has more than enough to be doing as it is. Giving him the captaincy long term will burn him out even quicker than he is at the moment. Kp, hmm I dunno, never seen him captain at any level but he hasn't been in the team for very long. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| I voted for Strauss, though if Giles is fit, I'd give it to him. At least he doesn't have much on his plate, and isn't a very good bowler at all. South Africa did the same thing, giving vice captaincy to Nicky Boje a while back. I think it is better if a player like Giles is captain, as he seems to have a smart cricketing brain, would know his fellow bowlers quite well, and he can let Strauss look after the batting side of things. Bottom line, it'll be a long, long summer if yer English! |
| ||||
| Flintoff is the man Ian Botham has now stated that Andrew Flintoff should be England captain. Quote:
__________________ Watch this for a perfect about. James May |
| ||||
| As far as i am concerned Vaughan is gone and forgotten until next summer so we need to work out now whether the burden is to much for Freddie to carry or let Strauss carry on as there is nobody else who can be trusted.I don't mind either of them getting it as long as they are backed by the other players and the press. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |