| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Spin on the Ashes. Well the run up to the Ashes has started in Earnest. Ricky Ponting says Australia are going to target Panesar here . Quote:
Quote:
And if Ponting is so impressed by Panesar, then Australia could have problems also at Sydney. Also if Panesar live up to Ponting fears, and Flintoff returns fit - then I think at this stage England just have the edge. Anyone that does not agree?.
__________________ Ern Last edited by Ernest : 13-08-2006 at 08:15 PM. |
| ||||
| Question for me is how well Flintoff and Harmison will go without swing... Flintoff played very poorly in the super-series, I know it was'nt a good indicator, but it is a batsmen's wicket generaly. Perth should be great viewing... Three of the world's best fast bowlers and of-course the mastery of McGrath (who took 7 wickets against Pakistan last time he played there).
__________________ It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them! Nietzsche |
| ||||
| Is this really spin? or is it just a journalist asking Ponting a question and him giving a stock answer? what did you expect him to say? "Yes, we can see monty's a good bowler so we won't even try scoring against him, we'll let him dominate and hopefully he'll bowl us out and we'll lose the ashes, we suck!". Can't help feeling that english people read far too much into what the aussies say about a series, i'm sure if they asked pietersen about shane warne he would say i'm going to try and play as positively as i can and hit him out of the attack. |
| ||||
| Have to agree with Vic, think it is just a standard answer to a very predictable question. As it is, as well as Giles played on the last Ashes series, if Monty plays he will add a huge amount to the attack, and could cause a suprise. The Aussies mentally have been preparing for four pace bowlers and an average spinner to break up the spells. But now they have a new factor, an attacking finger-spin bowler. Australia have demonstrated that they have a weakness against pace and bounce (Ashes) and high quality finger spin (India 2001) . The fact that England may have both options, will cause different problems from what the Aussies were expecting. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| But as Quagmire points out, surely theres only going to be sydney where it will take any sort of finger spin, and the aussies arent going to do an england and prepere wickets that will help the opposition and not the home side !
__________________ Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post! |
| | |||
| |||
| Panesar seems to give the ball a bit of spin though. Look at his performance at Headingley (tipped before the match to be the ground, as usual, for the Hoggards and Lewises of this world) - six wickets out of the eight going to English spinners in ten years have fallen to Panesar in one match (thanks to Mongoose for this statistic via the medium of the telephone). Panesar gives the ball such a rip that turn and bounce could happen anywhere and hence wickets. Obviously some surfaces are going to be better for him but he is looks to be a great spin option on all surfaces.
__________________ Whatever your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you mine are far greater! Albert Einstein, 1879-1955 |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| | ||||
| ||||
| Only Warne's preferred type of pitch is a bouncy one, not a bog standard slow turner. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Thats what Ithought. I was alway under the impression that finger and wrist spin needed different sorts of wickets. Thanks Dave !
__________________ Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |