Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > International Test Cricket > ITC Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2006, 03:02 PM in reply to Mr Hutt's post starting "first of all Notts im not slating..."
SixandOut SixandOut is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sixandout.net
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Hampshire, Guernsey
Posts: 75
Send a message via Yahoo to SixandOut
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Hutt
Secondly 348 runs in 50 overs makes for almost 7 an over.. 7x5=35 am i wrong??
You said more than 7 runs per over every over. So actually by your calculations it was never more than 7 runs an over in any over. The average is obviously a skewed stat, since the true innings average will likely have been between 5-6 runs an over with the odd very expensive over skewing upwards.

I'm not reading too much in to this match. First game of a series in new conditions, blah blah. It's no wonder everyone's a bit stiff. Sure, it would have been good to hammer them, but I'd rather they save their form for the tests!
__________________
Six and Out: Fine cricket journalism: http://www.sixandout.net/
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2006, 06:59 AM in reply to SixandOut's post starting "You said more than 7 runs per over..."
Mr Hutt's Avatar
Mr Hutt Mr Hutt is offline
Slightly Nuts & Lovin it
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(ENG) Passed Eddie Paynter's 1540 Test runs
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Karachi/Pakistan
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 1,524
Send a message via MSN to Mr Hutt Send a message via Yahoo to Mr Hutt
hmmm nit picking are we?? six and out... well around 7 runs an over for a score of around 348!!!! is not really giving runs at a miserly rate either... still it was an ODI match and a practice one at that... so lets leave it be for right now
__________________

  #53 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2006, 12:29 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "This series will be decided by spin i..."
KennyG's Avatar
KennyG KennyG is offline
Big double-ton
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria,Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria,St.K.F.C
Posts: 231
Quote:
As to the merits of the spinners. Warne will trouble England as always, but will McGill if he plays? I doubt England will be particularly fearful of McGill to be honest. The Aussies will not be fearful of Giles either, but this Panaser guy will be an X factor. Potentially, England could well match us in the spinners department is my conclusion.
MacGills record vs England.
6 tests.39 wickets at 24.72.
__________________
" You don't want the truth,you can't handle the truth."
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2006, 12:37 PM in reply to greg's post starting "I think you will find their natural..."
KennyG's Avatar
KennyG KennyG is offline
Big double-ton
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria,Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria,St.K.F.C
Posts: 231
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by greg
I think you will find their natural home is in London.
Sorry, I meant their spiritual home.

__________________
" You don't want the truth,you can't handle the truth."
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2006, 12:46 PM in reply to KennyG's post starting "MacGills record vs England. 6 tests.39..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyG
MacGills record vs England.
6 tests.39 wickets at 24.72.
Yes but of those 39 wickets, only three of them have been taken against current players (Hoggard 2, Trescothic 1). I don't think the current crop of English players can be compared to their inept predecesors. Strauss, Tresco, Pietersen, Flintoff - those guys are good players of spin.
I'm not saying MacGill would not enjoy success against England this summer -i think he would (especially against their tailenders) but i don't think the English team particularly fear him.
__________________

  #56 (permalink)  
Old 12-11-2006, 08:46 AM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "Some, but like most other people I feel..."
Mr Hutt's Avatar
Mr Hutt Mr Hutt is offline
Slightly Nuts & Lovin it
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(ENG) Passed Eddie Paynter's 1540 Test runs
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Karachi/Pakistan
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 1,524
Send a message via MSN to Mr Hutt Send a message via Yahoo to Mr Hutt
Well Jaques has struck another magnificent 100 against england in the three day match... and the first day end score was 325/5 NSW looking right on top of things.. I think a score of around 450-500 should be a good target to set?
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 12-11-2006, 11:34 AM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Yes but of those 39 wickets, only three..."
Clive Dunn Clive Dunn is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
My main national team: England
Posts: 50
I tend to agree with Seamer, the English batsmen won't fear MacGill the way they obviously do Warne. MacGill is a very, very good leggie, but he tends to give you a four ball an over - most of our batsmen are pretty aggressive so it's a matter of not letting him get away with the bad ball.

Still I tend to think that the MacGill / Warne partnership can be very successful - they are very different types of spinner. Warne gets wickets from vicious spin and unerring accuracy, MacGill gets them mostly from his googly. Should be an interesting battle.
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 12-11-2006, 12:14 PM in reply to Clive Dunn's post starting "I tend to agree with Seamer, the..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,511
I'm between Clive and Seamer on this one. The England batsmen won't fear Macgill. But they don't fear Shane Warne either. They'll give him a lot of respect - anyone would be mad not to - but fear is a word which dropped out of the England team's vocabulary in the northern summer of 2005.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 12-11-2006, 12:45 PM in reply to Mr Hutt's post "The Aussie Ashes Thread"
Colourful Chaddi's Avatar
Colourful Chaddi Colourful Chaddi is offline
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS) Passed Jeff Thomson's 679 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
My main national team: India
My other team/s: England
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Hutt
A thread where all Aussie fans and supporters can discuss their Ashes issues.... Pommy threads tend to get a little... how shall we call it verbose? lol

join up and make yself count here..!!!
If this thread is for Aussies, shouldn't it be in the Australian forum?
__________________
CC
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 12-11-2006, 01:37 PM in reply to Clive Dunn's post starting "I tend to agree with Seamer, the..."
KennyG's Avatar
KennyG KennyG is offline
Big double-ton
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria,Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria,St.K.F.C
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clive Dunn

Still I tend to think that the MacGill / Warne partnership can be very successful - they are very different types of spinner. Warne gets wickets from vicious spin and unerring accuracy, MacGill gets them mostly from his googly. Should be an interesting battle.
MacGill spins it way more than Warne.When they play together MacGill nearly always does better.Opp batsmen go for him instead Warne.If MacGill plays as much as Warne I reckon he will have better figures.As for the current crop of pom batsmen being good players of spin have a look at Warnes 2005 series.


5 tests,40 wickets at 19.93.
__________________
" You don't want the truth,you can't handle the truth."

Last edited by KennyG : 12-11-2006 at 03:57 PM. Reason: spelling
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Page generated in 0.764 seconds (77.57% PHP - 22.43% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0