Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > Members & Guest Lounge
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

Members & Guest Lounge A place for new and existing members to meet each other for some casual banter on any topic of interest. For real-time chat try our Chat Room. No password required. Guests are also welcome to post in this forum or use the Chat Room.

View Poll Results: Flintoff or Kallis?
Andrew Flintoff 11 68.75%
Jacques Kallis 5 31.25%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 18-02-2005, 06:35 AM
Paoli's Avatar
Paoli Paoli is offline
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Newcastle United
Posts: 3,330
The Best Allrounder: Kallis vs. Flintoff

Who is the World's best Allrounder??

Kallis or Flintoff, I think Flintoff because of his bowling ability.

For the record, this is overall, not in ODI's or test, rather a combo.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 22-02-2005, 06:37 AM in reply to Paoli's post "The Best Allrounder: Kallis vs. Flintoff"
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,359
I had to go FLintoff. Kallis would be the man if you wanted to draw a test. Flintoff if you wanted to win it. I would take the matchwinner any day .
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 22-02-2005, 06:39 AM in reply to Seamer's post starting "I had to go FLintoff. Kallis would be..."
Paoli's Avatar
Paoli Paoli is offline
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Newcastle United
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamer
I had to go FLintoff. Kallis would be the man if you wanted to draw a test. Flintoff if you wanted to win it. I would take the matchwinner any day .
Exactly. Kallis is a brilliant bat but his bowling lacks sting these days. Freddie has worked hard on not wanting to smack every ball out of the park and try and get a wicket every ball.

Freddie is reformed, and a matchwinner. Id take him....At least at ODI level.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 28-02-2005, 05:10 PM in reply to Paoli's post "The Best Allrounder: Kallis vs. Flintoff"
Rahul_Dravid's Avatar
Rahul_Dravid Rahul_Dravid is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: United Kingdom
My other team/s: England,India and Yorkshire
Posts: 7
Flintoff because he can bowl well and he can bat well.Most people will say "Kallis can too!" but Flintoff can rip teams apart with his monstrous sixes and he can hit huge scores and he can score quickly AND bat with discipline.Flintoff can bowl faster with accuracy where as Kallis doesn't bowl that quickly.I haven't seen Kallis bowl lately for the South Africans.Flintoff can make things happen,he can bowl to different kinds of fields,ATTACKING AND DEFENDING.He keeps his cool well in tight situations.
__________________
COME ON ENGLAND! BRING THE ASHES HOME!!!!!!!
Pietersen + Flintoff = DAMAGE
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 28-02-2005, 05:25 PM in reply to Rahul_Dravid's post starting "Flintoff because he can bowl well and..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
Kallis is a superb bat, I think he's no.1 in test and ODIs but I've always been left cold by his bowling, not that quick not alot of movement, always on a length but I remember watching him bowl over after over about 2 yards outide off stump - dreadfully boring. As an Allrounder its freddie by a mile, but as both are decent slip fielders its pretty close. Not sure who is the better overall player, or the most valuable to their respective sides.
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 28-02-2005, 05:48 PM in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "Kallis is a superb bat, I think he's..."
Chuck Palumbo Chuck Palumbo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Arsenal,and Warickshire
Posts: 298
I think Kallis is quickly losing his status as an all rounder. There is no doubt he is a fine batsman but his bowling has gone down dramatically in recent years due to various injuries. I think Kallis himself would rather be classified as a batsman rather than all rounder because he takes great pride in his batting but not so much with his bowling.

Flintoff on the otherhand is a genuine all rounder, although he is not as good a batsman as Kallis he can bat and bowl to devastating effect and he is also dynamite at slip. IMO there is no comparison between the two as all rounders. Maybe a fairer comparisons from the current era is with Cairns who was another genuine all rounder.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28-02-2005, 05:49 PM in reply to Chuck Palumbo's post starting "I think Kallis is quickly losing his..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
That would be closer, and I'd also bring Heath Streak into that equasion.
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 28-02-2005, 08:07 PM in reply to Chuck Palumbo's post starting "I think Kallis is quickly losing his..."
Rahul_Dravid's Avatar
Rahul_Dravid Rahul_Dravid is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: United Kingdom
My other team/s: England,India and Yorkshire
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Palumbo

Flintoff on the otherhand is a genuine all rounder, although he is not as good a batsman as Kallis he can bat and bowl to devastating effect and he is also dynamite at slip. IMO there is no comparison between the two as all rounders. Maybe a fairer comparisons from the current era is with Cairns who was another genuine all rounder.
Talking about slip catches did anyone see anyone see Freddie's catch against West Indies at home at leg slip with Ashley Giles' bowling?! THAT WAS AN ABSOLUTE BEAUTY!!!! I think it was off Lara or Bravo,I can't remember but all I can remember is that catch and he didn't celebrate that much did he? It was as if he always pulls of a catch like that and its not a big deal.
__________________
COME ON ENGLAND! BRING THE ASHES HOME!!!!!!!
Pietersen + Flintoff = DAMAGE

Last edited by Ernest : 03-03-2005 at 09:54 AM. Reason: Quoting Full Quotes
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2005, 01:18 AM in reply to Rahul_Dravid's post starting "Talking about slip catches did anyone..."
Beny's Avatar
Beny Beny is offline
WAT Australia A Selector 2004
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(WI-captain) Passed Jimmy Adams' 3012 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 3,041
Send a message via MSN to Beny
Ohh come on...

Kallis proved over the last tour that he is one of the best batsmen in the world and a good bowler to boot. Freddie failed with the bat and bowled OK... Flintoff needs to prove that he can maintain form before we start touring him as a world beater... o far he's only really fired once or twice.
__________________
It's hard enough to remember my opinions, without remembering my reasons for them!
Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2005, 07:52 AM in reply to Beny's post starting "Ohh come on... Kallis proved over the..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,831
Curious, isn't it: last spring it looked as if the world were awash with quality all-roiunders with Kallis, Pollock, Streak and Vettori leading the way but the likes of Flintoff, Razzaq, Gayle, Bravo, Symonds, Shoaib Malik, Razzaq, and half the NZ side all determined to join the party.

What happened?

Streak's been out.. but Kallis clearly played more as an occasional bowler in the SA series.. Pollock had an indiffferent series with the ball and an even worse one with the bat.. Flintoff, likewise, was patchy with the ball an devery inch a no 7 bat. The NZ side has been reduced to tatters by the Aussies with most of the would be all-rounders looking as if they can't bowl OR bat... and so on.

I'd guess that right now Vettori is the world's most in form all-rounder... but that's not saying a lot. Instead of looking like a crew of world beaters they are looking like a pretty ordinary bunch.

ps. what would a current World XI of all-rounders look like? Choices include (but are not limited to) Gayle, Jayasuria, Kallis, Styris, Streak, Collingwood, Symonds, Shoaib Malik, Flintoff, Razzaq, Pollock, Bravo, Taibu (can bowl), Vettori... and so on.
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:57 AM.

Page generated in 0.626 seconds (59.99% PHP - 40.01% MySQL) with 14 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0