Hide/show banner
New Zealand Cricket Forum

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > New Zealand Cricket Forum
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

New Zealand Cricket Forum A forum for domestic cricket discussion.
Tell us about your favourite club in New Zealand. Who are the key players to watch?

View Poll Results: Should Franklin bat ahead of Vettori?
Yes 5 71.43%
No 2 28.57%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 25-02-2008, 08:43 AM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "He definately should as there is no..."
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
(ENG) Passed John Snow's 772 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, Bangladesh
Posts: 808
A Test attack of Martin, Franklin, Mills, Vettori and Oram does certainly have a better ring to it than Martin, Mills and O'Brien, and it would strengthen up the tail a bit. But his ODI peformances leave a lot to be desired, and I'd still baulk at labelling hima better all-round bowler than Mills.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 25-02-2008, 09:04 PM in reply to Aurelius's post starting "A Test attack of Martin, Franklin,..."
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(SA-captain) Passed Jackie McGlew's 2440 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,464
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
Mills is probably a better ODI bowler than Franklin as if Franklin has a bad day, he'll go for plenty. In tests, Franklin's bad balls are less costly and he bowls more wicket taking deliveries than Mills, who, currently doesn't have much to him other than line & length (i.e. not enough seam or swing movement to account for good test batsmen).

Franklin is a better batsman than Mills to my mind. He even has a test century, away in South Africa to his name.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 26-02-2008, 02:34 AM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "Mills is probably a better ODI bowler..."
sittingduck sittingduck is offline
WAT New Zealand A Selector
(SA) Passed Peter Pollock's 607 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
My main national team: New Zealand
Posts: 610
I tend to agree with Andy here in terms of Mills v Franklin.

A lot of it though comes down to the amount of each type of cricket the two have played. Franklins played far more tests so he's more experienced in what it takes in that format whereas Mills is a one day specialist.

Mills will get to show in the coming england series what he's capable of in tests and maybe then its easier to compare the to.

I think Franklin is a better bat than Mills who tends to slog more.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 26-02-2008, 04:39 PM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "Mills is probably a better ODI bowler..."
Navdeep's Avatar
Navdeep Navdeep is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
(AUS) Passed Terry Alderman's 203 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Surrey
My main national team: New Zealand
My other team/s: Warwickshire/England/India
Posts: 211
Send a message via MSN to Navdeep Send a message via Skype™ to Navdeep
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Mellon View Post
Mills is probably a better ODI bowler than Franklin as if Franklin has a bad day, he'll go for plenty. In tests, Franklin's bad balls are less costly and he bowls more wicket taking deliveries than Mills, who, currently doesn't have much to him other than line & length (i.e. not enough seam or swing movement to account for good test batsmen).

Franklin is a better batsman than Mills to my mind. He even has a test century, away in South Africa to his name.
Agreed, they would both go in my test and ODI team when fit, simply for the fact franklin offers variety and bowls wicket taking deliveries, like you stated. Best attack they would possess is Franklin, Mills, Martin + Vettori (with Oram/Styris etc).

His batting offers depth but the whole right medium fast phase at the moment, Mason, Gillespie, Mills, O'Brien, Hitchcock?! etc...very 1 dimensional and predictable, even stick Oram in that fold, although hes an all rounder who's economical 9/10.

Remember when they lost in SA a couple years ago (maybe the series where he got that maiden ton) he bowled a cracking delivery to beat the defences of Kallis over the wicket, he does that more often and stays injury free then hes a key part to this bowling attack, now Bond-less. Hope hes available for the summer tour to England as the swinging ball should do him the world of good.
__________________
Hoggy Hoggy Hoggy...OI OI OI!!!

www.navsites.co.uk <<< Join, post and have fun
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:59 PM.

Page generated in 0.378 seconds (57.34% PHP - 42.66% MySQL) with 14 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0