Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pakindya Fan I just can't see why shoaib akhtar wasn't picked. I think the selectors have to start realising that even though pakistan can win without he brings an extra dimention to heir bowling atack |
I think our selectors do realise that - but they just weren't convinced with regards his fitness - frankly I wasn't either (it's just not merely about his weight, he just didn't look, to me, like he was match fit). Bring me a fit Shoaib who can give me 20 overs in a day, for five days, and five tests, ...Boy I'll so take that Shoaib.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ninjaman I'm not saying that counseling is bad at all, just bringing it in to rectify faults that should not be there in the first place in players selected for international cricket, shows the weakness of our set up. |
Well then in principle we're in agreement, we might differ over how talented Gayle, Sarwan and Hinds are there's no arguing that on-their day they can be good enough. I don't believe though that 'techinical defficencies' as they're called is what seperates them from doing it just on their day and not more consistently. As Rachael always says there have been many, many player with not enough natural talent or ability, and even flaws in their technique (read Steve Waugh's weakness against short pitch bowling) - but given you're mentally strong you can learn, or rather enable to get the best of what you have - be it limited. Of coarse, sports psychology will be no magic wand - I don't see any remedy playing that kind of role - but it definately think of it as one of the measures needed to be taken.
Improving the first class cricket structure though, I would tend to agree, would help West Indies cricket in the long run more than any other remedy we can think of. I wonder if it would have been a better idea to make Bennet King head coach of the West Indies Youth Academey (do they have one?) instead of the senior side....