Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket > ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. One day cricket.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2005, 12:11 PM in reply to Maranello's post starting "He does look decent on TV too RWS ;-) ..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maranello
He does look decent on TV too RWS ;-)

6 an over from here on end is possible, but not much batting depth; there are only Watson and Hogg,
Yet, not much depth and while Watson and Hogg are decent batsmen, you would not want to expose them too early. And they won't be. This has been a good oppurtinity for the younger guys to have a decent bat, under pressure to score at a decent run rate, while not getting out. And they have done so (100 run partnership of 111). This game is proving excellent value for Australia regardless of the result. The top order have failed but they will find form before the ashes starts. And the young guys have been given a chance to show what they have got.
I reckon Aus will win this one for the record
__________________

  #22 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2005, 12:18 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Yet, not much depth and while Watson..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,359
Clarke's gone. Good time for Watson to come in with 15 overs to go. He needs a chance to get runs if he wants to keep his spot in front of Symonds and show what he has got
__________________

  #23 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2005, 12:27 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Clarke's gone. Good time for Watson to..."
R W S's Avatar
R W S R W S is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 1,279
Collingwood Catch

Download and have a look at THE catch!

www.rapidshare.de/files/2479918/Collingwoodcatch.wmv

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciricinfo
34.5 Flintoff to Hussey, two runs, dropped! width outside the off stump,
cut away uplishly to backward point, this time Collingwood fails
to hold on to a fairly easy chance
(gotta go for real now!)
__________________


Last edited by R W S : 19-06-2005 at 12:33 PM.
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2005, 12:41 PM in reply to R W S's post "Collingwood Catch"
Trescothick's Avatar
Trescothick Trescothick is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Uxbridge, London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Bermuda
Posts: 654
Send a message via MSN to Trescothick
Quote:
Originally Posted by R W S
Download and have a look at THE catch!

www.rapidshare.de/files/2479918/Collingwoodcatch.wmv

(gotta go for real now!)
What a catch!! Thanks very much for that
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2005, 12:43 PM in reply to R W S's post "Collingwood Catch"
Victor Frankenstein's Avatar
Victor Frankenstein Victor Frankenstein is offline
(ENG) Passed Bob Taylor's 1156 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hampshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,187
why do people keep calling hussey a 'young guy', he's 30! (i know that's young for us mere mortals, but for a cricketer that's closing on retirement, 20-25 is what i'd call young)

I think england have missed a trick here, we had a real opportunity to put the kosh on australia and really make them ask themselves some serious questions for the rest of the summer, but instead we go in a bowler short for no real reason, our batsmen are doing well so have faith in them to get the runs.

Ordinarily at this point i'd say australia were a definate for the win, but we've been batting well recently and australia have been bowling badly, so it could still go either way.

I didn't expect england to bowl out oz for 50 and for the game to be over by 11.30, australia are the best side in the world for a reason, and i do feel we've bowled ok in patchs, in ordinary circumstances i'd say we're doing well to restrict australia, but considering the form they were in i think we could and should have put more pressure on them with an extra bowler and dropping solanki. I understand them having to pick lewis for consistency, but he shouldn't have been in the squad in the first place.
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2005, 12:45 PM in reply to Trescothick's post starting "What a catch!! Thanks very much for that"
Maranello's Avatar
Maranello Maranello is offline
Moderator
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - England A 2005
(PAK-captain) Passed Mushtaq Mohammad's 3643 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dubai
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 3,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trescothick
What a catch!! Thanks very much for that
One of the best catches I have seen, but he blotted his copybook by dropping a sitter later on, at the same position from a similar stroke.
__________________
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes
Mark Twain
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2005, 12:55 PM in reply to Maranello's post starting "One of the best catches I have seen,..."
Victor Frankenstein's Avatar
Victor Frankenstein Victor Frankenstein is offline
(ENG) Passed Bob Taylor's 1156 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hampshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,187
well look at that, 2 proper bowlers getting out batsmen that are out of form/still acclimitising... who would have thought it!

edit: forgot to say, great video cheers, stunning catch, Collies definatly been watching his "Jonty Rhodes 100 greatest catches" video again
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2005, 01:05 PM in reply to Victor Frankenstein's post starting "why do people keep calling hussey a..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor Frankenstein
why do people keep calling hussey a 'young guy', he's 30! .
Caompared to the rest of the Aussie squad, he's a spring chicken! Seriosly though, when i refer to a young guy, i mean young in experience.
P.S GREAT spell from Harmison. 5-33 and good batsmen all. Must say he is looking VERY good.
__________________

  #29 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2005, 01:15 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Caompared to the rest of the Aussie..."
Mongoose's Avatar
Mongoose Mongoose is offline
(WI) Passed Lawrence Rowe's 2047 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manchester, North-West England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancashire
Posts: 2,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamer
P.S GREAT spell from Harmison. 5-33 and good batsmen all. Must say he is looking VERY good.
That's what Harmo is at his best - very good, a handful for any batsman in world cricket. Trouble is, how often will he be at his best. He has produced it sporadically so far. Let's hope the radar is locked on for the summer now. That would be some spectacle - Harmison in form v Hayden / Ponting in form.
__________________
Just what is going off out there?
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2005, 01:21 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Caompared to the rest of the Aussie..."
Victor Frankenstein's Avatar
Victor Frankenstein Victor Frankenstein is offline
(ENG) Passed Bob Taylor's 1156 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hampshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,187
fair enough, i didn't mean just you though, on the radio they keep going on about the "young" guys doing so well in respect to hussey and clarke.

Harmison has bowled exceptionally well, i know australia aren't at their best yet but those are still top class batsmen and he got them all out with clever bowling rather than them getting themselves out, very impressive.

This has been a really good game so far, australia did well to come back from the sudden collapse, and england have then come back well from that once we put our proper bowlers back on.

In confident mood i'd say that 250 isn't enough, australia will have to turn on the world champions level or be very lucky with umpiring decision or a close run out to stop us getting that as it's a good batting wicket and we've been playing well. Guess we'll find out in a couple of hours, first true test of our batsmen's nerve so it should be interesting!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12 AM.

Page generated in 0.528 seconds (68.12% PHP - 31.88% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0