Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket > ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. One day cricket.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 22-06-2005, 08:45 AM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "Aggers made a good point that when a..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,831
I'd not be surprised to see Collingwood play a Test this summer... especially now that Marsh has dropped out of the picture as a selector (presumably allowing Fletcher a greater say). I'm not sure how he's set compared with Key and Butcher as a specialist bat.... but he might get the nod ahead of either if England decided to make do with just 4 frontline bowlers... and I can't see anyone getting in ahead of him if Flintoff pulls up injured.
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 22-06-2005, 08:47 AM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "Aggers made a good point that when a..."
Oliver's Avatar
Oliver Oliver is offline
(SA) Passed Graeme Pollock's 2256 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South West London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Tottenham Hotspur
Posts: 2,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanflinger
Now the big question - has Collingwood made a case for Test inclusion. Most of you would be laughing at this suggestion, that because he is in good form and has just scored a very quick hundred in an ODI that he should benow be in the frame, and yet we have applied this logic to KP?
Come on FF, I don't think there is any comparison between the pop-gun bowling attack of Bangladesh and the slightly out-of-sorts Australians.

The Australians come into each match with their own aura of superiority and a class line in sledging.
If the Bangladeshis attempted to sledge the English batsmen (well obviously aside from that non-ODI star Michael Vaughan) I imagine they'd've all laughed in their faces.

The Australians are without a shadow of doubt better than the Bangladeshis - I realise that I'm not writing anything new here... but I feel it needs pointing out to some people - and I think that you can safely say that 91 not out from 65 balls against Australia is way more impressive than 112 not out from 86 balls against Bangladesh.

Collingwood has made a case for Test selection against inferior sides... we already knew he could do that. And I imagine that he already knows he is a permanent fixture in our ODI side.

Pietersen has made a case for Test selection against Australia.
__________________
Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 22-06-2005, 08:51 AM in reply to Oliver's post starting "Come on FF, I don't think there is any..."
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(NZ-captain) Passed Ken Rutherford's 2465 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,477
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver
Collingwood has made a case for Test selection against inferior sides... we already knew he could do that. And I imagine that he already knows he is a permanent fixture in our ODI side.
Collingwood (as I'm sure Rachael will soon point out) performed pretty well in his only test outings against Sri Lanka in a series in which English batsman did not exactly cover themselves in glory.

He's bloody unlucky to be a good player at a time when the test side don't need him. I'm sure on current form, he would have walked into the England team 5 years ago.
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 22-06-2005, 09:03 AM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "Collingwood (as I'm sure Rachael will..."
Mongoose's Avatar
Mongoose Mongoose is offline
(WI) Passed Lawrence Rowe's 2047 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manchester, North-West England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancashire
Posts: 2,055
And England have another name thrown into the hat of contention. It's great that we have all these guys putting their hand up. We now have to think about who we're going to leave out, rather than where we're going to get four middle order players from. Good news indeed, and bodes well for England's continued development.
__________________
Just what is going off out there?
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 22-06-2005, 09:08 AM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "Collingwood (as I'm sure Rachael will..."
Oliver's Avatar
Oliver Oliver is offline
(SA) Passed Graeme Pollock's 2256 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South West London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Tottenham Hotspur
Posts: 2,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Mellon
He's bloody unlucky to be a good player at a time when the test side don't need him. I'm sure on current form, he would have walked into the England team 5 years ago.
Not quite right... sorry to split hairs... difficult to see who he would have replaced. I guess Hussain cracked a finger before the second Test... but I think you'd be wanting him to play instead of Craig White, who was superb in that series.

Perhaps seven years ago, against the South Africans. I wouldn't've minded seeing him play instead of Mark Ealham.
__________________
Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 22-06-2005, 09:13 AM in reply to Oliver's post starting "Not quite right... sorry to split..."
Notts Exile Notts Exile is offline
(IND) Passed Farokh Engineer's 2611 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Notts
Posts: 2,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver
Perhaps seven years ago, against the South Africans. I wouldn't've minded seeing him play instead of Mark Ealham.
He may be a better batsman but he's certainly not as good a bowler as Ealy. The former Kent man has a Test bowling average of 28 !!
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 22-06-2005, 09:14 AM in reply to Notts Exile's post starting "He may be a better batsman but he's..."
Oliver's Avatar
Oliver Oliver is offline
(SA) Passed Graeme Pollock's 2256 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South West London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Tottenham Hotspur
Posts: 2,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notts Exile
He may be a better batsman but he's certainly not as good a bowler as Ealy. The former Kent man has a Test bowling average of 28 !!
There you are, you see Andy, there's always somebody who will disagree with you.
__________________
Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept

Last edited by Oliver : 24-06-2005 at 07:25 PM.
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 22-06-2005, 09:23 AM in reply to Oliver's post starting "There you are, you see Andy, there's..."
Notts Exile Notts Exile is offline
(IND) Passed Farokh Engineer's 2611 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Notts
Posts: 2,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver
There you are, you see Andy, there's always somebody who will disagree with you.
I'm not disagreeing that Collingwood would have got into the team five, six or seven years ago. I was merely responding to the comment that he would have been better in South Africa than Ealham was. I should have made that more clear. He's certainly a better international cricketer than Ealy, though Ealy was discarded quicker than most! Ealham is a very good one-day bowler, keeps it tight gets good sideways movement. He can bat and field well, it was no surprise he got a chance in the one-day arena. Collingwood will always be a batting all-rounder, and hopefully he'll continue to do a good job. Test match wise, we have better batsmen waiting.
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 22-06-2005, 09:45 AM in reply to Notts Exile's post starting "I'm not disagreeing that Collingwood..."
Oliver's Avatar
Oliver Oliver is offline
(SA) Passed Graeme Pollock's 2256 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South West London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Tottenham Hotspur
Posts: 2,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notts Exile
I'm not disagreeing that Collingwood would have got into the team five, six or seven years ago.
I can't agree with that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Notts Exile
Test match wise, we have better batsmen waiting.
I completely agree with that.

I'm afraid that Collingwood was always destined to be a "nearly man" when it comes to Test cricket.
There have been very many of those. Steve James, Wayne Larkin, Ed Smith, James Whitaker, to name but a few, unfortunately treated by Test selectors, and unlucky - in some ways - to play when they did.

Thank God for One Day Internationals which have allowed some of these dogs, their day in the spotlight.

And that from a man who really doesn't like the one day game.

I guess Tim Tremlett was a "nearly man" for many years.
As I wrote above, I'm very pleased to see his son getting a chance. I hope Chris makes the step up to Test cricket too.
__________________
Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 22-06-2005, 09:51 AM in reply to Oliver's post starting "I can't agree with that. I..."
Notts Exile Notts Exile is offline
(IND) Passed Farokh Engineer's 2611 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Notts
Posts: 2,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver
I guess Tim Tremlett was a "nearly man" for many years.
As I wrote above, I'm very pleased to see his son getting a chance. I hope Chris makes the step up to Test cricket too.
I only saw Tim bowling at Trent Bridge, he never looked much more than an honest county pro. Steady but certainly nothing spectacular, not much better than Cardigan Connor! You probably saw more of him that I did. His son looks very useful. His height will be a great help. That he already knows which end of the bat to use goes in his favour too!!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Page generated in 0.627 seconds (72.56% PHP - 27.44% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0