Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket > ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. One day cricket.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2005, 12:44 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "In my bowling days, i was just a medium..."
greg's Avatar
greg greg is offline
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
WAT England A Selector-2005
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(AUS-captain) Passed Ian Chappell's 5345 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salop/England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,346
You could put beamer offenders in the stocks and throw rotten fruit at them
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2005, 05:17 PM in reply to Victor Frankenstein's post starting "he means if you let it go 3/4 of a..."
Lemming Lemming is offline
(NZ-captain) Passed Jeff Crowe's 1601 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Warwickshire
Posts: 1,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor Frankenstein
he means if you let it go 3/4 of a second early it comes out at beamer height instead of yorker length.
Surely 3/4 of a second earlier, Lee was still about three paces away from his delivery? 3/4 of a second is a long time? Considering it take 0.4 - 0.5 seconds to react to a delivery, those 3/4 of a second would have given Trescothick 1 1/4 seconds to react to the beamer, he could have been 5 yards away knowing that the ball was going to fly over his stumps, or even set himself up for some sort of cut!
__________________
Whatever your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you mine are far greater!
Albert Einstein, 1879-1955
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2005, 05:42 PM in reply to Lemming's post starting "Surely 3/4 of a second earlier, Lee was..."
Victor Frankenstein's Avatar
Victor Frankenstein Victor Frankenstein is offline
(ENG) Passed Bob Taylor's 1156 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hampshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,187
pedant in aisle twelve, pedant in aisle twelve, please assist.
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2005, 06:03 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "In my bowling days, i was just a medium..."
Oliver's Avatar
Oliver Oliver is offline
(SA) Passed Graeme Pollock's 2256 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South West London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Tottenham Hotspur
Posts: 2,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamer
Just like the odd long hop gets bowled, so does the beamer. Can't be avoided. If you bowl two in an innings, you are removed from the attack for the remainder of the innings. This is a fair rule, and what alternitive could we have.
There are a lot more long-hops than beamers... why's that?

I suppose McGrath did get away with a few waist high full-tosses in the last over on Saturday!

Brett Lee is only 28. He hasn't played too much Test cricket (37 matches, around 1200 overs)... it occurs to me that I've seen him bowl an awful lot of beamers... and I don't recall too many (if any) being bowled, so regularly, by "quicks" from the past.

This suggests to me that Lee does it on purpose.

Granted with the ICC disallowing too many bouncers per over, the bowlers art of surprise has been somewhat damaged, but beamers are bloody dangerous at high pace.

I think a fair rule would be to remove the bowler from the team for the entire series if he bowls two head high beamers.

It is unnecessary and possible to avoid.

All Merv Hughes' harping on about: "if you get yer action a bit wrong, it's gonna happen mate" is pure unadulterated rubbish.

It's: "if you do it that way, you'll bowl a beamer."

I'm a swing bowler. I know how to bowl a beamer, a yorker, a ball of full length (with apologies to Christopher Martin-Jenkins) and a long-hop. And granted it's easier when you bowl slower, but I'll bet Brett Lee knows how too.

If he plays in the Tests, he'll bowl some more beamers, and he'll be doing it on purpose.
__________________
Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2005, 06:07 PM in reply to Oliver's post starting "There are a lot more long-hops than..."
Mongoose's Avatar
Mongoose Mongoose is offline
(WI) Passed Lawrence Rowe's 2047 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manchester, North-West England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancashire
Posts: 2,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver
There are a lot more long-hops than beamers... why's that?
Because a long hop is closer to the average delivery than a beamer. I haven't worked it out, but I'm sure if you took the angle of release for the average ball and measured the deviation needed for both a beamer and a long hop, there would be much more deviation from the average needed for a beamer.
__________________
Just what is going off out there?
  #106 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2005, 06:12 PM in reply to Mongoose's post starting "Because a long hop is closer to the..."
Oliver's Avatar
Oliver Oliver is offline
(SA) Passed Graeme Pollock's 2256 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South West London
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Tottenham Hotspur
Posts: 2,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mongoose
Because a long hop is closer to the average delivery than a beamer.
Yes, that's true of course... but you're not rolling the ball down your fingers for a yorker, when you're bowling a beamer. You're aiming it at the guys head.

IF you're not doing that, then at least you've set the target in your minds eye, and you've decided not to attempt to hit the deck.

You've done it on purpose.

I think it's jolly hard to do it by accident, unless you're a completely useless bowler, and I've seen plenty of those in Sunday friendly cricket, but they're usually pretty slow.
__________________
Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept

Last edited by Oliver : 05-07-2005 at 06:14 PM.
  #107 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2005, 06:26 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "In my bowling days, i was just a medium..."
Alison's Avatar
Alison Alison is offline
(ENG) Passed John Snow's 772 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Plymouth
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Somerset
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamer
If you bowl two in an innings, you are removed from the attack for the remainder of the innings. This is a fair rule, and what alternitive could we have.
Do you think there should be anything in place for if someone bowls quite a lot of beamers without bowling more than one in any particular innings? Maybe something along the lines of 'if you bowl x beamers in y months you have to do some remedial work on your action to try and sort whatever problem is causing it out'. This would be without making any sort of claims about whether it was accidental or deliberate.

I don't know what would be appropriate values for x and y by the way, does anyone have any suggestions?
  #108 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2005, 06:33 PM in reply to Alison's post starting "Do you think there should be anything..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
At this level regardless of pace, 2 in 12 months. Any old toss pot and try and bowl a yorker and end up doing a beamer if they arent very good, but lee is a test player. any more than 2 and its a ban till you get it right or decide to just stop doing it on purpose.

How many beamers have people seen in the test/ODi arena or county circuit ?? Not many I'll bet.
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
  #109 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2005, 06:45 PM in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "At this level regardless of pace, 2 in..."
Richard Jenkins's Avatar
Richard Jenkins Richard Jenkins is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
(ZIM-captain) Passed David Houghton's 1464 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Méron, France
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: Cricket
Posts: 1,485
Send a message via MSN to Richard Jenkins Send a message via Yahoo to Richard Jenkins
Fair cop?

That ball was a deliberate delivery by Lee and If he does bowl in the ashes he'll try it again. I know what the difference is between inswinging yorker and beamer and its a concious decision for the beamer more than 99% of the time. Lee knows too. Anyone who's done a bit of bowling knows.The beamer is when the ball slips out the hand and is never a ball that curves towards the batsman's head at 90 mph, unless deliberate.

Lee needs a serious talking to . Even if it is the 0.01% 'genuine mistake gov'.
__________________
I have a dream.... (Martin Luther King)
  #110 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2005, 09:03 PM in reply to Richard Jenkins's post "Fair cop?"
Leafy Seadragon Leafy Seadragon is offline
(ENG) Passed Angus Fraser's 388 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 387
I'm in partial agreement with you Richard. I think Lee needs a talking to. I agree entirely with Alison earlier. Whatever the reason its happening, Lee and Australia need to get it sorted out. I'm not convinced that Lee is bowling beamers deliberately. If I had to bet on it, I'd certainly be betting yes, but I think that its a pretty serious label to hrow at anyone, that you are deliberately trying to hit them, with reason to think that it might seriously hurt or even kill them...hmmm.

I think that Lee has a notorious lack of control (see nearly every other post with Lee's name in it). The occasions when the beamer's appeared have been when he's been a bit frustrated, often with specific circumstances, so could reasonably be looking for something special (which doesn't discount either option - deliberate or accident). The limited I know of Lee (interviews and third person accounts) doesn't give me any insight into whether he has anger management issues (surely what we're talking about given the seriousness of the offence).

I do have a serious issue with two aspects. Lee must sort this out. Resolve his issues or get remedial bowling training now, before he plays again. Alternatively, if it really is accidental as he loses control striving for the extra pace on an inswinging yorker, don't bowl that particular delivery or take the edge off the pace when you bowl it.

My biggest criticism I reserve for the Australian Cricket Team management and the ACB. Why the heck haven't they stepped in and told Lee to fix the problem? This is in my opinion unforgivable
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 AM.

Page generated in 0.824 seconds (78.48% PHP - 21.52% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0