Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket > ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. One day cricket.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2005, 01:48 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "I tried it. It seemed to annoy the..."
Mongoose's Avatar
Mongoose Mongoose is offline
(WI) Passed Lawrence Rowe's 2047 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manchester, North-West England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Lancashire
Posts: 2,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamer
I tried it. It seemed to annoy the English members more than me being cocky. Damned if you do, damned if you don't Beny.
Here in England, we actually EXPECT you Aussies to be cocky. It's part of the English stereotypical view of Australians. We love to put nations in boxes. Aussies are brash/arrogant; Germans are efficient/arrogant; the French are temperamental/arrogant; Americans are rich/arrogant. We feel comfortable if you conform to the stereotype!

Anyway, back to the game ... I think England's top order has done very badly, but I don't think this has much bearing on the tests. It's a different game, a different situation.
__________________
Just what is going off out there?
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2005, 01:54 PM in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "Problem is seamer, Beny is saying what..."
Milo Milo is offline
World XI (1980 onwards) -World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG) Passed George Lohmann's 1205 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
My other team/s: England
Posts: 1,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie Benauds Love Child
Problem is seamer, Beny is saying what we're all saying - aus will no doubt win the ashes - only saying it in a crappy way ! .
I totally agree RBLC. I tried to point this out to him...and he went and used his powers as a moderator to edit my post. I try to highlight the antagonistic nature of his message and he goes and censors my words. Surely this cannot be right!!!!
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2005, 01:54 PM in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "Problem is seamer, Beny is saying what..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie Benauds Love Child
Point is sometimes England have performed, acknowledgement for that would be nice. We do when the aussies play well (like to today mcgrath was awesome) You cant just keep saying your out of practice - england said that against SA and after a while it just didnt wash..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamer
England can not be accused of not being able to mount a recovery. 228 looked a long way off at 6-93. .
Would the England teams of 1989-2003 be able to achieve this? Nope. I give credit where credit is due myself. And criticise where criticism is due. I have certainly bagged Ponting, Clarke and Gillespie this summer. And have attacked Kattitch and Martyn in the past too and for the record i am just waiting for those guys to slip up .
I respect this England team. The best they have produced in a generation. But once this Aussie team gets going, they are a sight to behold. I think we are just about to start seeing it too.
__________________

  #64 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:00 PM in reply to Mongoose's post starting "Here in England, we actually EXPECT you..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mongoose
Anyway, back to the game ... I think England's top order has done very badly, but I don't think this has much bearing on the tests. It's a different game, a different situation.
Normally i would agree Mongoose. But the likes of Tresco, Clarke, Hayden, Strauss, Gillespie, Collingwood, will be very short if confidence (and time in the middle) come Ashes time. The performances of individuals will have a flow on effect for the tests i feel. From an overall team point of view, i agree however.
__________________

  #65 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:00 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "Would the England teams of 1989-2003 be..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
I agree with all that seamer !
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:06 PM in reply to Milo's post starting "I totally agree RBLC. I tried to point..."
Maranello's Avatar
Maranello Maranello is offline
Moderator
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - England A 2005
(PAK-captain) Passed Mushtaq Mohammad's 3643 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dubai
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 3,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milo
I tried to point this out to him...and he went and used his powers as a moderator to edit my post. I try to highlight the antagonistic nature of his message and he goes and censors my words. Surely this cannot be right!!!!
It is not.

Beny is offline now, but this point will be addressed and discussed whenever he is back on, and I will report back to you on progress. In order to avoid this conversation being lost in various posts on today's ODI, let's take this up over PMs.
__________________
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes
Mark Twain
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:10 PM in reply to Maranello's post starting "Lemming, you cannot do that. If someone..."
Lemming Lemming is offline
(NZ-captain) Passed Jeff Crowe's 1601 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Warwickshire
Posts: 1,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maranello
Lemming, you cannot do that. If someone has bowled out their full quota, the sub cannot bowl any more. Similarly, if someone is out, the sub cannot bat again. If someone has bowled 5 overs, the sub can only bowl the remaining 5 of their quota. Makes sense really.
Good call. I sort of remember these rules now. In that case, I believe we should scrap the substitution rules, it's absolutely stupid!!!!
__________________
Whatever your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you mine are far greater!
Albert Einstein, 1879-1955
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:11 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "Seamer, As I have stated the ODI's..."
Seamer Seamer is offline
(ENG) Passed Wilfred Rhodes' 2325 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanflinger
Seamer,
As I have stated the ODI's are not England's best suit. Our batsmen in Tests will pick the bad ball to hit, here they got themselves out by trying to attack good bowling..
I am not so sure FF. It is hard to turn off your natural instincts in the space of nine days. Often, you hear from the top players that switching from ODI mode to test mode is very difficult. This problem applies to both teams though. The Aussie top order has not looked much better than the English, i'll admit that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flanflinger
More worrying for Aus is they had England at 90odd for 6, and then letting England escape to 228-7.
Yes but that recovery was done against Clarke and Symonds. In the tests, it will have to be done against McGrath and Warne.
__________________

  #69 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:15 PM in reply to Seamer's post starting "I am not so sure FF. It is hard to turn..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
And theres the rub. Argubly your best bowler hasnt played yet.
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:20 PM in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "And theres the rub. Argubly your best..."
Notts Exile Notts Exile is offline
(IND) Passed Farokh Engineer's 2611 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Notts
Posts: 2,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie Benauds Love Child
And theres the rub. Argubly your best bowler hasnt played yet.
And to add to that, we probably won't pick Pietersen either!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:00 AM.

Page generated in 0.536 seconds (68.02% PHP - 31.98% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0