Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket > ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. One day cricket.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2005, 01:13 PM in reply to ykickamoocow's post starting "Thats the problem with day matches, if..."
Big Merv's Avatar
Big Merv Big Merv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Broken Hill, Australia
My other team/s: Australia, NSW
Posts: 237
Send a message via MSN to Big Merv Send a message via Yahoo to Big Merv
It was a night match.
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2005, 01:28 PM in reply to ykickamoocow's post starting "Thats the problem with day matches, if..."
Maranello's Avatar
Maranello Maranello is offline
Moderator
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - England A 2005
(PAK-captain) Passed Mushtaq Mohammad's 3643 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dubai
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 3,700
It was a day/night match though, wasn't it? Started mid-afternoon or something. Not sure any full ODIs do start any later than that, since a (say) 6pm start would mean the match finished at 2am the next morning!!
__________________
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes
Mark Twain
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2005, 01:31 PM in reply to Maranello's post starting "It was a day/night match though, wasn't..."
Big Merv's Avatar
Big Merv Big Merv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Broken Hill, Australia
My other team/s: Australia, NSW
Posts: 237
Send a message via MSN to Big Merv Send a message via Yahoo to Big Merv
That is correct Maranello. It was a day/night match. I have never heard of any later than that either. A 2am finish would be silly.
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2005, 02:03 PM in reply to Big Merv's post starting "That is correct Maranello. It was a..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
Why is it despite the big names, a resurgent aus, i just cant motivate myself to be interested in this whatsoever. Was it any good ?
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2005, 04:25 PM in reply to Richie Benauds Love Child's post starting "Why is it despite the big names, a..."
Henners Henners is offline
(AUS) Passed Damien Fleming's 305 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Daventry, United Kingdom
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Northamptonshire, Essex and Somerset
Posts: 325
it was very good when it world XI bowled there 50 overs, then when the sri lankan opener (i forget his name sankurra or something) got 50, then when freddy got to the crease, but as soon as he went out we knew world XI lost.

swhy dont they simply select 11 england players, it will work better
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2005, 06:55 PM in reply to Henners's post starting "it was very good when it world XI..."
Crunchy Crunchy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
My main national team: England
Posts: 194
I must say the world XI pace attack was very lacklustre indeed and I'v been told by an Aussie mate that Flintoff was averaging between 75 and about 82mph most of the time can anyone confirm this.
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2005, 07:26 PM in reply to Crunchy's post starting "I must say the world XI pace attack was..."
Colourful Chaddi's Avatar
Colourful Chaddi Colourful Chaddi is offline
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS) Passed Jeff Thomson's 679 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
My main national team: India
My other team/s: England
Posts: 683
The result was not at all suprising. I predited that the Australians will be the best team out of the two because they have the luxury of working together. The bowling by the world XI was medicore until Daniel Vettori and Muralithran did some damage. The batting was very poor considering thier reputations, only Kumar Sankagrrah and Andrew Flintoff showed some resistance. Rahul Dravid did not perform as well as i thought he would and it was a game to forget for Brain Lara who was dismissed for a duck!

I am predicting another victory for the Austtralians because the world XI players are not playing to their full potential. The problem is motivation for them. becaue they are playing more games they don't want to risk themselves for injury because it won't help they home nations. I don;t think they are all to worried about their reputation unlike what some former players have said, i think reputations can be made easily in cricket with a couple of good performnaces.
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2005, 07:35 PM in reply to Colourful Chaddi's post starting "The result was not at all suprising. I..."
TPL288 TPL288 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
My other team/s: Australia
Posts: 13
Damien Martyn

Is Damien Martyn a cousin of Ian Bell? They must be training together. Damien Martyn - word of advice: give up before you career average is around 20 and under, which is what he is currently on based on his recent performances.
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2005, 07:48 PM in reply to Colourful Chaddi's post starting "The result was not at all suprising. I..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,831
Akhtar was apparently beating the bat a bit in his opening spell... but must have been bowling some dross in with the good stuff.. and got caned a little at the end. Pollock's bowling figures speak for themselves (he was apparently getting movement in the air and off the seam and beating the bat regularly). Murali and Vettori were, by all accounts, exemplary.

On the down side.. Flintoff's figures were little short of appalling... but that's just one bowler of the main five.

I reckon the RoW bowlers did enough... but I'm going to be interested in tomorrow's newspaper reports on that batting display: some pretty crummy dismissals in there.
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2005, 07:49 PM in reply to TPL288's post "Damien Martyn"
Collyisamackem's Avatar
Collyisamackem Collyisamackem is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chester, UK
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Somerset
Posts: 3,368
Anybody else think Afridi should open instead of Sehwag? I'm not too worried for the World XI as I think the World XI will pull their batting together for the next game. Their bowling was fine today, especially Vettori (who I must admit I have never seen bowl before), and even though Kallis and Flintoff went for a few - that won't happen often in any format. It's great fun to see all those guys playing together.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Page generated in 0.676 seconds (69.38% PHP - 30.62% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0