| | |
| | |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. One day cricket. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-12-2005, 01:35 PM
in reply to Notts Exile's post starting "Anyone recall KP's knock at Bristol..." | ||||
| ||||
| this is a big problem now for england that their captain is out now they had to work very hard
__________________ Cricket is best game in the WORLD.   |
|
06-12-2005, 01:47 PM
in reply to arsalan660's post starting "this is a big problem now for england..." | ||||
| ||||
| No, I disagree... now England only have to hide Pietersen in the field.
__________________ Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept |
|
06-12-2005, 01:55 PM
in reply to arsalan660's post starting "this is a big problem now for england..." | ||||
| ||||
| bad news for england because vaughen is the best captain and a good player now this is a fatal thing for england
__________________ Cricket is best game in the WORLD. |
|
06-12-2005, 02:41 PM
in reply to Oliver's post starting "No, I disagree... now England only have..." | |||
| |||
| Quote:
You're talking about "hiding" the best boundary fielder we have??? |
| ||||
| He runs fast, picks up the ball, tumbles over and then get's it back in with his strong baseball throw... it's a good place to hide people who can't catch and don't hit the stumps that often from close in. Of course Vaughan can barely run or catch... so it's really pretty darned hard to hide him. However, all the other guys are better specialists in close, Flintoff, Trescothick, Giles, Bell, close catchers. Collingwood, Solanki, Strauss covers and mid-wicket. Well you wouldn't want Simon Jones belting round and sliding into the boards... not after Australia 2002/3. So, in answer to your question, yes I was hiding our best boundary fielder. Oh Hurrah! I've passed Rachael Heyhoe-Flint... jolly hockey sticks and all!
__________________ Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept |
| ||||
| Of course, we haven't discussed the Blackwell equation when it comes to fielding!
__________________ I'll have the Mouseburger please, with a side of Goldfish. |
|
06-12-2005, 04:42 PM
in reply to Teatime FatCat's post starting "Of course, we haven't discussed the..." | ||||
| ||||
| Damn, we might have to hide him too. Perhaps we can get KB Ramaswami to officiate, and Blackwell should just about be able to hide behind him.
__________________ Red-it, Red-it, Read it and wept |
|
06-12-2005, 04:45 PM
in reply to Teatime FatCat's post starting "Of course, we haven't discussed the..." | ||||
| ||||
| Having thought, I'd play this line-up: Tresco (c), Strauss, Bell, Pietersen, Collingwood, Flintoff, Solanki, Jones (wk), Plunkett, Harmison, Anderson. Supersub - Blackwell or Prior. |
|
06-12-2005, 04:49 PM
in reply to Collyisamackem's post starting "Having thought, I'd play this line-up:
..." | ||||
| ||||
| No, I'd start with a spinner in the first XI and a second spinner / batsman as the supersub.
__________________ I'll have the Mouseburger please, with a side of Goldfish. |
|
06-12-2005, 05:13 PM
in reply to Teatime FatCat's post starting "No, I'd start with a spinner in the..." | ||||
| ||||
| In that case, Blackwell in the side and Solanki/Loudon as sub? Or we could start with Blackwell and Solanki, and leave Anderson or Loudon as sub? I really don't want to even mention Udal...oops! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
