Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket > ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards.
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. One day cricket.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2005, 12:00 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post "A little piece of trivia"
Victor Frankenstein's Avatar
Victor Frankenstein Victor Frankenstein is offline
(ENG) Passed Bob Taylor's 1156 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hampshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,187
well that's that over with then, congratulations again Pakistan, I do wonder if England will finally work out that if you bowl a yorker length at 90mph you've got a reasonably high chance of getting a wicket and it's about the only way you will get wickets on these pitchs. Pakistan have been doing it since the first test though and England still haven't worked it out though so I won't hold my breath, more of the same for the 4th and 5th odi I suspect, I had hoped my 4-1 to Pakistan prediction was just pessimism but sadly it seems true.

We haven't had a competitive odi side since 1997, it makes no sense though, I wouldn't drop any of the current players except one or other of prior and jones as i don't see the point in having two keepers when you could have one specialist batsman and a keeper, i don't really care which one though, i'd go for prior on current form but no other reason, they're both much of a muchness. The bowling attack is good and the batting is good, they just don't ever seem to combine well like they do in test matches, Tresco's not the best of captains but a lot of the problems are focused on the coach imo, just no tactics for how to go about the innings when batting and never seemingly bowling to any kind of plan, which is so odd because they stick to their plans so well in test cricket these days.
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2005, 12:02 PM in reply to Mike's post starting "What did I say earlier about yorkers?..."
smickel's Avatar
smickel smickel is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
My other team/s: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 80
Send a message via MSN to smickel
England in trouble now, 5 wickets down, run rate less than 5, required rate almost 9.

Just took a quick look at LG ODI rankings, never realised how close it was, 4 teams all tied together on 109 points.
__________________
Smickel
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2005, 12:05 PM in reply to smickel's post starting "England in trouble now, 5 wickets down,..."
Victor Frankenstein's Avatar
Victor Frankenstein Victor Frankenstein is offline
(ENG) Passed Bob Taylor's 1156 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hampshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,187
btw, anyone know why we're not using our batsman supersub? surely Bell should have come in ahead of Jones and possibly Colly? or is this some secret plan by Fletcher the odi genius to bring Bell out at 120-9 and have him and plunkett knock off the runs at 25 an over?
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2005, 12:16 PM in reply to Victor Frankenstein's post starting "btw, anyone know why we're not using..."
Victor Frankenstein's Avatar
Victor Frankenstein Victor Frankenstein is offline
(ENG) Passed Bob Taylor's 1156 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hampshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,187
half way into the innings now, scoring at 4.88 an over but still 231 short of the total with only 5 wickets left, needing 9.24 runs an over. Miracles do happen in cricket, but i think it's safe to say we've gone on a canoeing holiday up a certain creek and left all our paddles behind.

excellent effort there by colly, giving the pakistani team some fielding practice, very charitable of him.
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2005, 12:17 PM in reply to Victor Frankenstein's post starting "btw, anyone know why we're not using..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,511
I would have expected Bell to be in before now. But even with Collingwood going for the sixth wicket, he's still in the pavilion. Blackwell in, England looking down the barrell of a big defeat.

Quick question regarding the ICC ratings. Last week, it was noted by several reporters that England need to win this series in order to be in the top six on 1/4/06, which is the qualifying date for determining who has to play in the ICCCT preliminaries. Since then, some newspapers have said that England has this series and a couple of ODIs against India to get itself into the top six. But I thought the ranking points were awarded based on series results? If that's the case, surely the India series is wholly irrelevant? Does anyone know?
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2005, 12:17 PM in reply to Victor Frankenstein's post starting "btw, anyone know why we're not using..."
Richie Benauds Love Child's Avatar
Richie Benauds Love Child Richie Benauds Love Child is offline
.
(PAK) Passed Mudassar Nazar's 4114 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sheffield
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,158
I'd argue we could/should have won a test or two but you have to admit at this ODI lark, Pakistan are streets ahead. We deserve to be 7th after this performance. Actually read performances.
__________________
Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post!
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2005, 12:17 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "I would have expected Bell to be in..."
smickel's Avatar
smickel smickel is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
My other team/s: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 80
Send a message via MSN to smickel
By reading commentary sounds like Collingwood went for a slog and came off second best.
__________________
Smickel
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2005, 12:19 PM in reply to smickel's post starting "By reading commentary sounds like..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,511
Yes, that's what it sounded like on the radio as well.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2005, 12:23 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "Yes, that's what it sounded like on the..."
flanflinger's Avatar
flanflinger flanflinger is offline
WAT England A Selector-2005
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS-captain) Passed Kim Hughes' 4415 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Surrey and the Mighty Mighty Quinns
Posts: 4,450
Bell is padded up now,

seems a bit pointless to me...

Collingwood went for a big sweep and didn't get enough bat on it....

Pakistan have played well and used the conditions well. England haven't. The really dissapointing thing is that they don't seem to have learned!!
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2005, 12:30 PM in reply to flanflinger's post starting "Bell is padded up now, seems a bit..."
Victor Frankenstein's Avatar
Victor Frankenstein Victor Frankenstein is offline
(ENG) Passed Bob Taylor's 1156 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hampshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,187
indeed flan, i don't mind losing to a better more experienced side on their home conditions, it's the fact that we seemed to have learnt nothing from it that annoys me. I said after the first match that although we'd won it, our bowling was poor and they only got out because the required rate was so high that they had no choice, our batting was a bit lucky but deserved to set that total, but it seems they've put in their once per tour performance now so now we just have to put up with the embarassment :/

I think Englands biggest problem in odi's is that they only ever focus on the total when chasing, they never just build their score in 5 or 10 over blocks like other sides do. How many times do you ever see a successful run chase match the required rate throughout an innings? very rare, it's usually a case of keeping wickets in hand, building up partnerships and then an all out blitz for the last 10-15 overs to catch back up with batsmen that are set, versus fielders and bowlers who are tired and can see the game ebbing away from them.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:04 AM.

Page generated in 0.557 seconds (66.17% PHP - 33.83% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0