| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| ODI Archived Threads 2005 Onwards. One day cricket. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | ||||
| ||||
| btw, anyone know why we're not using our batsman supersub? surely Bell should have come in ahead of Jones and possibly Colly? or is this some secret plan by Fletcher the odi genius to bring Bell out at 120-9 and have him and plunkett knock off the runs at 25 an over? |
| | ||||
| ||||
| half way into the innings now, scoring at 4.88 an over but still 231 short of the total with only 5 wickets left, needing 9.24 runs an over. Miracles do happen in cricket, but i think it's safe to say we've gone on a canoeing holiday up a certain creek and left all our paddles behind. excellent effort there by colly, giving the pakistani team some fielding practice, very charitable of him. |
| | |||
| |||
| I would have expected Bell to be in before now. But even with Collingwood going for the sixth wicket, he's still in the pavilion. Blackwell in, England looking down the barrell of a big defeat. Quick question regarding the ICC ratings. Last week, it was noted by several reporters that England need to win this series in order to be in the top six on 1/4/06, which is the qualifying date for determining who has to play in the ICCCT preliminaries. Since then, some newspapers have said that England has this series and a couple of ODIs against India to get itself into the top six. But I thought the ranking points were awarded based on series results? If that's the case, surely the India series is wholly irrelevant? Does anyone know?
__________________ Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy. Spike Milligan |
| | ||||
| ||||
| I'd argue we could/should have won a test or two but you have to admit at this ODI lark, Pakistan are streets ahead. We deserve to be 7th after this performance. Actually read performances.
__________________ Nothing says "Obey Me" like a bloody head on a fence post! |
| | ||||
| | ||||
| By reading commentary sounds like Collingwood went for a slog and came off second best.
__________________ Smickel |
| |||
| Yes, that's what it sounded like on the radio as well.
__________________ Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy. Spike Milligan |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Bell is padded up now, seems a bit pointless to me... Collingwood went for a big sweep and didn't get enough bat on it.... Pakistan have played well and used the conditions well. England haven't. The really dissapointing thing is that they don't seem to have learned!! |
| | ||||
| ||||
| indeed flan, i don't mind losing to a better more experienced side on their home conditions, it's the fact that we seemed to have learnt nothing from it that annoys me. I said after the first match that although we'd won it, our bowling was poor and they only got out because the required rate was so high that they had no choice, our batting was a bit lucky but deserved to set that total, but it seems they've put in their once per tour performance now so now we just have to put up with the embarassment :/ I think Englands biggest problem in odi's is that they only ever focus on the total when chasing, they never just build their score in 5 or 10 over blocks like other sides do. How many times do you ever see a successful run chase match the required rate throughout an innings? very rare, it's usually a case of keeping wickets in hand, building up partnerships and then an all out blitz for the last 10-15 overs to catch back up with batsmen that are set, versus fielders and bowlers who are tired and can see the game ebbing away from them. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |