| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general ODI and 20/20 issues, women's ODI cricket and ODI matches involving Associate and Affiliate members. |
| View Poll Results: Shall we dump the 50 over game in favour of the 20 over version? | |||
| Yes, it is the future | | 2 | 4.76% |
| No, The ODI's are still valuable | | 35 | 83.33% |
| Not sure, let's wait and see | | 5 | 11.90% |
| Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| What I would actually like to see is a Twenty20 European Cup - of course England would start off being favourites, but many of the lesser-known cricketing countries would then have a chance to show off their talents, in a game which is not as difficult as Test/ODI cricket. |
| |
| So what happens in 20 years time when people say that 20-20 is stale,do we go with a 10 over match? |
| |||
| Seems Ponting is as wary as I am of overdoing the new format....... Source: Click Here Quote:
|
| ||||
| I agree with Ponting's view. What I don't agree with is the description of Bobby McFerrin's 'Don't Worry Be Happy' as a 'novelty hit'. That was a class tune, and it's deeply insulting to place it in the same category as the likes of Crazy Frog and Mr Blobby. I heard that McFerrin once broke down in his car, and other drivers were singing his song to him as they went past.
__________________ Just what is going off out there? |
| |||
| No way.....20-20 might create its own space, but will never be able to replace one-dayers....just like one-dayer couldnt replace test cricket. Personally I enjoy test cricket the most. One day matches are most exciting alright, you see so much action and excitment, but test cricket is real cricket where skills are tested. And honestly 20-20 does not excite me. I have seen a few matches and missed cricket every time. Its all about stroke play. 20-20 is more for the Afridis than the Laras. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Look at the crowds in this years Ashes, 5 times the revenue of one day cricket. Also if good Test cricket is being played, no need to be supplimented by the one day game, people will pay to watch good cricket. I think one day cricket should do what the English premiership did to the 'Football League'.
__________________ Ern |
| | |||
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ The Australian Cricket Team - The Greatest Cricket Team Ever |
| ||||
| I'm a big fan of 20/20 cricket as it brings people into the game. However, i do think that if it's over exposed then it becomes the norm and people will stop watching it, it's a novelty game and should remain so. I would still scrap ODI's though, or i'd reduce them to 40/45 overs, or have some kind of change to make it so the game isn't just 15 overs of batting, then nothing for a couple of hours, then 10 overs of slogging, it's boring and predictable. I think that the idea of a super 12-esque competition would be great. 20-20 is a great way to bring domestic cricket back to life and think that if the top domestic team from each country then played in an international finals or something that would be spark more interest in other peoples domestic cricket too. Semi-finals of Somerset v New South Wales and Indian Railways v KwaZulu Natal etc.. would be great |
| | |||
| |||
| 20/20 is rubbish, mite as well set up a bowling machine and have a six hitting competition. The outcome is normally decided withen 22 or 23 of the 40 overs just makes it boring, crickets not a explosive bang wow game like say basketball, it's a absorbing game where the excitement come from the tension throughout the day/days and way teams can come from being down and out to win in the last over, you cant come from behind in 20/20. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |