Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general ODI and 20/20 issues, women's ODI cricket and ODI matches involving Associate and Affiliate members.

View Poll Results: Shall we dump the 50 over game in favour of the 20 over version?
Yes, it is the future 2 4.76%
No, The ODI's are still valuable 35 83.33%
Not sure, let's wait and see 5 11.90%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2006, 10:32 AM in reply to sittingduck's post starting "20/20 is rubbish, mite as well set up a..."
trojan!'s Avatar
trojan! trojan! is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
My other team/s: South Africa
Posts: 119
No way! I don't like Twenty20 games. It is just taking it too far. I think its pointless, all you see is slogging... Sure, its entertaining, but I think all cricket will become a slog fest then, and nothing will be in it for the bowlers
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2006, 01:12 PM in reply to trojan!'s post starting "No way! :-/ I don't like Twenty20..."
DomainK DomainK is offline
(ENG) Passed George Lohmann's 1205 Test runs
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mumbai, India
My main national team: India
Posts: 1,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by trojan!
all you see is slogging... Sure, its entertaining, but I think all cricket will become a slog fest then, and nothing will be in it for the bowlers
I agree.....its all about slogging...
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2006, 10:20 AM in reply to DomainK's post starting "I agree.....its all about slogging..."
Victor Frankenstein's Avatar
Victor Frankenstein Victor Frankenstein is offline
(ENG) Passed Bob Taylor's 1156 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hampshire
My main national team: England
Posts: 1,187
I don't mean to be rude, but those just saying it's slogging, have you ever watched a proper 20/20 game, ie not one involving australia and new zealand where people come out dressed in wigs and treat it like a joke?

It is fast paced yes, but i think there is more to it than just slogging, watch the county season of it, far better than any of the international matches of it so far. Personally i think it improves defensive bowling and makes good captaincy essential, a dot ball is like gold dust, and the best innings aren't usually the ones that just come out slogging from ball one (although it's good against bowlers not really trying, ie most of the international games so far of 20/20). This is the main reason i suggested it be a club competition rather than an international competition, as club sides take it seriously and play it properly.

Don't get me wrong, clearly it doesn't have the depth and test of cricketing skills that Test cricket has, and it should never be looked at as anything more than an introduction to the game, but it does take skill to play it properly and imo isn't just the slog fest it's detractors make it out to be.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2006, 01:21 PM in reply to Victor Frankenstein's post starting "I don't mean to be rude, but those just..."
Mr Cricket's Avatar
Mr Cricket Mr Cricket is offline
WAT Journalist
(PAK) Passed Mushtaq Ahmed's 656 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Karachi/Pakistan
My main national team: Pakistan
My other team/s: KARACHI DOLPHINS, LAHORE BADSHAHS!!
Posts: 670
Futre

You all know that it is the future. Shure it will make the game more big hitting but thats what most off us enjoy. See I dont know about you guys but I am not a BIG fan of test cricket. Unless If it is a very close match. I like to see big hitting and a 20/20 game is perfect. I will feel very sorry for the deffensive players. They wont be on the squad just big hitters.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2006, 02:35 PM in reply to Mr Cricket's post "Futre"
DomainK DomainK is offline
(ENG) Passed George Lohmann's 1205 Test runs
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mumbai, India
My main national team: India
Posts: 1,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by uham
You all know that it is the future.
Its not "the future". It can be a part of the future and I dont think it will make a very big impact in near future.


Quote:
Originally Posted by uham
Shure it will make the game more big hitting but thats what most off us enjoy
Yeah we all enjoy hitting....but dont think we (members of this board) enjoy only hitting and I think thats clear from the votes cast in this thread. A cricket match is not all about hitting.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2006, 02:48 PM in reply to Victor Frankenstein's post starting "I don't mean to be rude, but those just..."
DomainK DomainK is offline
(ENG) Passed George Lohmann's 1205 Test runs
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mumbai, India
My main national team: India
Posts: 1,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor Frankenstein
but i think there is more to it than just slogging
I agree, it cant be all bad. Its a game and there has to be several interesting features. From what I have seen so far, I havent seen nothing more than just slogging. At the same time I admit that I havent seen enough of those.

But compared to one day cricket, I find it not good enough. As far as the question of 20-20 replacing one-days, I cant see that happening. From what I have seen so far, I dont like 20-20s. Like I said already, I miss cricker when I wath these matches. Of course its my personal opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2006, 10:32 PM in reply to Victor Frankenstein's post starting "I don't mean to be rude, but those just..."
Rachael Rachael is offline
Administrator
WAT selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG-captain) Passed Mike Atherton's 7728 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norfolk
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
Posts: 7,835
What's most relevent in terms of how 20-20 does is surely the world of gambling in India / beyond: Indian Cricket already all but runs world cricket on the basis of understanding the way to milk the ODI game like a cash cow... and if 20-20 is going to attract an even more sub-continental punters into mad wagers.... then the future of the new format is secure.

The question on the ODI front then becomes one of relevence / redundancy in the betting world... as that appears to drive the most relevent of the public interest that drives advertising interest and (consequently) the value of TV rights.

Cricketing considerations don't strike me as likely to get a look in when the Indian Cricketing authorities are telling the ICC how it's going to be... and I'm not sure other bodies like the ECB can claim the moral high ground here (in the ECB's case especially, given their sell-out to Sky).

For what it's worth... I prefer ODI cricket because in between all the **** like the pinch hitting in the opening overs and the slogging at the end.... there's a chance for decent, unspectacular cricket based on working the ball around, stealing quick singles into the gaps and managing risk in pacing an innings.

In short... ODI cricket allows world-beating specialists like Fairbrother, Bevan and Inzi to shine precisely because it has a sensible duration.

Last edited by Rachael : 12-01-2006 at 10:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 13-01-2006, 05:26 AM in reply to Rachael's post starting "What's most relevent in terms of how..."
Big Merv's Avatar
Big Merv Big Merv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Broken Hill, Australia
My other team/s: Australia, NSW
Posts: 237
Send a message via MSN to Big Merv Send a message via Yahoo to Big Merv
I say keep the ODI's. Sure the 20/20 games are very entertaing but it akes alot out of the players. Did you see how exhausted Martyn was after his innings. It looked like he just got out of a pool, thats how much he was sweating.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 13-01-2006, 12:57 PM in reply to Big Merv's post starting "I say keep the ODI's. Sure the 20/20..."
redback's Avatar
redback redback is offline
Maiden century
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria
Posts: 108
20/20 is crap.....but in saying that so is the powerplay and the super sub... why do the powers to be go and stuff something up (ODI) when there was nothing wrong with them
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 15-01-2006, 11:28 AM in reply to Ernest's post starting "I am not going to bang on about..."
Big Merv's Avatar
Big Merv Big Merv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Broken Hill, Australia
My other team/s: Australia, NSW
Posts: 237
Send a message via MSN to Big Merv Send a message via Yahoo to Big Merv
Which 'Brother' are you agreeing with?
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 PM.

Page generated in 0.580 seconds (64.40% PHP - 35.60% MySQL) with 14 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0