Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general ODI and 20/20 issues, women's ODI cricket and ODI matches involving Associate and Affiliate members.

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2006, 10:37 PM in reply to Vrock's post starting "At one point he managed to disect two..."
NTC187's Avatar
NTC187 NTC187 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Queensland, Australia
My main national team: I support more than one national team
My other team/s: New Zealand, India
Posts: 69
Send a message via MSN to NTC187
While having recorded his worst ODI bowling performance, he also recorded his best ODI batting performance of 27, with a couple of huge sixes too.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2006, 06:51 AM in reply to NTC187's post starting "While having recorded his worst ODI..."
Doink's Avatar
Doink Doink is offline
(WI) Passed Lance Gibbs' 488 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pune, India.
My other team/s: India.
Posts: 488
Send a message via Yahoo to Doink
Murali will be back!

Good point there. He surely did his bit with the bat. Will be interesting to see how he does in the 'final' final! Bandara got only got 5 overs while Vaas was a class apart.?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2006, 10:07 AM in reply to Doink's post "Murali will be back!"
Colourful Chaddi's Avatar
Colourful Chaddi Colourful Chaddi is offline
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS) Passed Jeff Thomson's 679 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
My main national team: India
My other team/s: England
Posts: 683
This is not all suprising for me, I always thought of Murali as a minnow basher and today it showed that he can't bowl against class batsmen on non-friendly picthes.

The amount of wickets Murali has is because he bowls on very friendly spinning tracks back at home and he also plays against the minnows on a more freqeunt basis.
__________________
CC

Last edited by Waseem : 13-02-2006 at 10:51 AM. Reason: Removing something which broke forum rules.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2006, 02:35 PM in reply to Colourful Chaddi's post starting "This is not all suprising for me, I..."
Cricketboy's Avatar
Cricketboy Cricketboy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Middlesex
Posts: 71
Murali is an amazing bowler. No one can have his record of wickets by just going on what you have said about him.

Last edited by Collyisamackem : 15-02-2006 at 08:55 PM. Reason: Private (Myself-Waseem)
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2006, 03:32 PM in reply to Cricketboy's post starting "Murali is an amazing bowler. No one can..."
Colourful Chaddi's Avatar
Colourful Chaddi Colourful Chaddi is offline
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS) Passed Jeff Thomson's 679 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
My main national team: India
My other team/s: England
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cricketboy
Murali is an amazing bowler
I disagree with you saying he is an amazing bowler, I think he is an ordinary spinner who only gets wickets because he has tailor-made spinning wickets back at home and that he plays the minnows alot, which increases his wicket tally.

An amazing bowler has skill in which he can take wickets never mind the conditions, for example Malcolm Marshall who took wickets on any surface. The other day against Australia Murali had no clue how to play top class batsmen, the same why he was struggling against the Indians recently.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cricketboy
No one can have his record of wickets by just going on what you have said about him.
I think if a spinner was able to ball on the pitches Murali has for more than half of his career he would end up with 1000+ test wickets to his name. If Shane Warne got the chioce of the picth he would have prefered he would also have more wickets than Murali, if Curtley Ambrose had picthes like the WACA who knows how many wickets he would have got.

To say Murali is a great bowler is wrong IMO.
__________________
CC

Last edited by Collyisamackem : 15-02-2006 at 08:55 PM. Reason: Private (Myself-Waseem)
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2006, 06:07 PM in reply to Colourful Chaddi's post starting "I disagree with you saying he is an..."
Cricketboy's Avatar
Cricketboy Cricketboy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Middlesex
Posts: 71
i admitt i havn't seen much of Murali mainly due to me not having sky etc. What i am basing my opinions on are what i have read or heard. I have heard so many great things about Murali and even Warne, the best bowler in the world says he is a good bowler and i heard hims ay he thought Murali will be the first bowler to take 1000 test wickets, now for someone as good as warne to say that he must be pretty good. Judging that you are the only person i have ever heard say something bad about Murali (ignoring the chucking debate) i still maintain my thoughts that Murali is an amazing world class bowler, just by looking at his stats i can see that.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2006, 07:49 PM in reply to Colourful Chaddi's post starting "I disagree with you saying he is an..."
Vrock's Avatar
Vrock Vrock is offline
Moderator
WAT Journalist  
Creator of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
Read my Articles
WAT selector - West Indies A
WAT England A Selector-2005
(ENG-captain) Passed Ted Dexter's 4502 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yorkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: West Indies, Yorkshire
Posts: 4,433
Send a message via Yahoo to Vrock
Waseem...You rate Murali (according to what you have said in another thread Who is the best spinner?) as the second best spinner in the world right now. Yet you rate him as an "ordinary spinner". Are you saying bar Warne that all spinners in world cricket are ordinary?
__________________
Watch this for a perfect about.
James May

Last edited by Vrock : 13-02-2006 at 09:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2006, 08:08 PM in reply to Vrock's post starting "Waseem...You rate Murali (according to..."
Colourful Chaddi's Avatar
Colourful Chaddi Colourful Chaddi is offline
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(AUS) Passed Jeff Thomson's 679 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
My main national team: India
My other team/s: England
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vrock7
Are you saying bar Warne that all spinners in world cricket are ordinary?
Yes I believe Shane Warne is far better than any spinner at the moment. He is a great spinner and I don't think any other spinner at the moment come close to him in greatness or skill.

Some poeple will have different opinon about Murali but in my opinon Murali is NOT a world class bowler as people have been saying, and my reasons for that is said in my post above.
__________________
CC
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2006, 09:10 PM in reply to Colourful Chaddi's post starting "Yes I believe Shane Warne is far better..."
Vrock's Avatar
Vrock Vrock is offline
Moderator
WAT Journalist  
Creator of WAT Cricketers of the Year 2005
Read my Articles
WAT selector - West Indies A
WAT England A Selector-2005
(ENG-captain) Passed Ted Dexter's 4502 Test runs
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yorkshire
My main national team: England
My other team/s: West Indies, Yorkshire
Posts: 4,433
Send a message via Yahoo to Vrock
I understand your point of view and I am not doubting that, my opinion differs but that's for another thread, however you imply all other world bowlers are "ordinary". I believe this is definitely not true. Kumble, Vetorri, MacGill, Kaneria, Singh...these are all class bowlers. YES they can look ordinary compared to someone like Warne. However they are still class bowlers, if anything this shows that Warne is that much better compared to everyone else but not that all other spinners bar Warne are ordinary.
__________________
Watch this for a perfect about.
James May
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2006, 09:38 PM in reply to Vrock's post starting "I understand your point of view and I..."
Quagmire's Avatar
Quagmire Quagmire is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
WAT Journalist
Moderator
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: melbourne
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: Victoria, Lancashire, Durham
Posts: 1,646
Murali is no doubt in Warnes class, but Murali has always struggled in Australia in comparson to anywhere else in the world, he is not the bowler he use to be psyically due to his elbow injury, he could go two ways he will either become a smarter bowler like Warne ( because psyically Warne is no what he use to be but he has become a better bowler with age, wisdom and accuracy ) if murali does that he will be around for a long time if not i think he will retire before Warne. Every bowler get smashed from the very best to the very worst. Ok i have not seen a bowler get smashed like that ( especially Murali ) but in a one day match where ponting makes 120 odd and symonds makes 150 odd it could have happened to any bowler even Warne.
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:44 PM.

Page generated in 0.479 seconds (64.57% PHP - 35.43% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0