Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general ODI and 20/20 issues, women's ODI cricket and ODI matches involving Associate and Affiliate members.

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-03-2007, 07:10 PM
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,511
Ireland set a good target

Again Ireland have shown themselves to be no mugs. They have scored 183-8 off a 48 over innings, which, due to the mysteries of the D/L method, will leave the West Indies with a target of 190 off the same number of overs. Please don't ask me how that comes about! It's surely a competitive total.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-03-2007, 07:19 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post "Ireland set a good target"
adamberry's Avatar
adamberry adamberry is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year
Journalist
WAT selector - West Indies A
WAT England A Selector-2005
(AUS-captain) Passed Jack Ryder's 1394 Test runs
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: Kent, Ireland, Davington Priory CC
Posts: 1,401
Send a message via MSN to adamberry
This is what the BBC is currently reporting:

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC
West Indies beat Ireland by 6 runs (D/L)
Incredible how the Windies can win without batting isn't it?!

The target is higher for the West Indies as they know how many overs they have available to them, i.e. 48 overs. Ireland had fewer than they were expecting, and so were pacing themselves for a 50 over innings. That's the best explaination I can come up with.
__________________
"Being second is to be the first of the ones who lose."
- Ayrton Senna
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-03-2007, 07:36 PM in reply to adamberry's post starting "This is what the BBC is currently..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,511
Yes, I know that's the logic, Adam. And actually I am quite a fan of D/L, even though it can be pretty opaque at times.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23-03-2007, 08:03 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "Yes, I know that's the logic, Adam. ..."
adamberry's Avatar
adamberry adamberry is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year
Journalist
WAT selector - West Indies A
WAT England A Selector-2005
(AUS-captain) Passed Jack Ryder's 1394 Test runs
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: Kent, Ireland, Davington Priory CC
Posts: 1,401
Send a message via MSN to adamberry
Yes, so am I... sorry if I came across a bit know-all there.

Anyway, I hate to say this but I have my doubts as to how Ireland will be able to defend such a target, I just feel that the West Indies should chase down a target of 190 with comparitive ease.
__________________
"Being second is to be the first of the ones who lose."
- Ayrton Senna
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 23-03-2007, 08:32 PM in reply to adamberry's post starting "Yes, so am I... sorry if I came across..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,511
Sorry, Adam - that's not at all what I intended to convey! You're right of course: the Windies will get there easily enough - especially if they carry on with 17 run overs as in the tenth. But I still think Ireland have acquitted themselves very well. Other debutants have folded; Ireland not only got through the innings again, but put something credible on the board. And they will be there in the Super Eights, which is looking pretty unlikely at the moment for India, who now need 119 more runs of 15 overs with only three wickets remaining**. (Their progress is dependent on the Bangladesh v Bermuda game, but Bangladesh should take that with ease to dislodge India and progress with Sri Lanka from Group B.)

This World Cup is going to be remembered sadly for events off the field. But in fact I see in Ireland's performance some justification for the ICC's persistence (and Heaven knows I'm not always one of their great defenders) in admitting associate nations to this showpiece event of the one-day game. To that extent, it is big news. And let's not forget that Kenya are still in with a chance tomorrow as well. Who would have thought it? Ireland, Bangladesh and maybe Kenya instead of Pakistan, India and maybe England? It's got to be great news for cricket, albeit bad news for those top flight teams making way.

** Update: Sri Lanka beat India by 69 runs.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan

Last edited by Occasional Fan : 23-03-2007 at 09:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 23-03-2007, 09:49 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "Sorry, Adam - that's not at all what I..."
adamberry's Avatar
adamberry adamberry is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year
Journalist
WAT selector - West Indies A
WAT England A Selector-2005
(AUS-captain) Passed Jack Ryder's 1394 Test runs
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: Kent, Ireland, Davington Priory CC
Posts: 1,401
Send a message via MSN to adamberry
Quite true. Okay, so the Bermudan's and Scot's haven't done much at all, what could be expected of them in such difficult groups. Ireland, on the other hand, have shown that they have what it takes to make a decent fist of their games in a less than certain group to predict. I've always thought that Ireland were unlucky not to win the ICC Trophy (the qualifiers for this WC), as they've often shown they have the most promise.

And that promise will be shown again, I'm sure, during the Super Eights.
__________________
"Being second is to be the first of the ones who lose."
- Ayrton Senna
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 23-03-2007, 10:24 PM in reply to adamberry's post starting "Quite true. Okay, so the Bermudan's and..."
EllN EllN is offline
WAT Journalist
Maiden century
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester
My main national team: England
My other team/s: lanchasire
Posts: 137
Send a message via MSN to EllN
Sadley i think the upsets are over, only because the element of suprise has gone, irelands organisation an bangaldesh young sprit will be fased out by talent though maybe england may slip up, i think thats always on the card but for the rest it would take a mass batting callopse to worry them and even then against ireland you would feel comfrotabel defending 210 an 250 against the tigers, but it qouldnt ssuprise me if kenya beat england tomorow under tikolo's leadership, and englands regular callopses, if england win the toss they must bowl, but being english we never get our own way
__________________
Finally England have risen from the ashes.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 23-03-2007, 10:28 PM in reply to EllN's post starting "Sadley i think the upsets are over,..."
Navdeep's Avatar
Navdeep Navdeep is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG) Passed Sydney Barnes' 242 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Surrey
My main national team: New Zealand
My other team/s: Warwickshire/England/India
Posts: 247
Send a message via MSN to Navdeep Send a message via Skype™ to Navdeep
Quote:
Originally Posted by EllN
Sadley i think the upsets are over, only because the element of suprise has gone, irelands organisation an bangaldesh young sprit will be fased out by talent though maybe england may slip up, i think thats always on the card but for the rest it would take a mass batting callopse to worry them and even then against ireland you would feel comfrotabel defending 210 an 250 against the tigers, but it qouldnt ssuprise me if kenya beat england tomorow under tikolo's leadership, and englands regular callopses, if england win the toss they must bowl, but being english we never get our own way
wouldnt mind to see it happen lol, but doubt it would. even with Englands collapses, doubt they can throw this away vs the Kenyans, and i still dont think they are the team of 4 years ago, despite recent good form, just don't see it, and think England should be comfertable enough in the game.
__________________
Hoggy Hoggy Hoggy...OI OI OI!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 PM.

Page generated in 0.512 seconds (64.50% PHP - 35.50% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0