Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general ODI and 20/20 issues, women's ODI cricket and ODI matches involving Associate and Affiliate members.

View Poll Results: Who will get the nod?
Jamie How 0 0%
Hamish Marshall 5 71.43%
James Marshall 0 0%
Michael Papps 2 28.57%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25-03-2007, 06:45 PM
Navdeep's Avatar
Navdeep Navdeep is online now
WAT World Cup Predictor
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG) Passed Sydney Barnes' 242 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Surrey
My main national team: New Zealand
My other team/s: Warwickshire/India
Posts: 249
Send a message via MSN to Navdeep Send a message via Skype™ to Navdeep
Thumbs down Vincents out

Vincents out!!! Really like him, struck by a Shane Bond delivery, and broken his wrist, fully story here.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cric...nd/6493903.stm

Question is...who will replace him? (of course if the ICC allow it, which they should) My guess would be Hamish.

Cant really see Brendom opening again...so an opener has to be called up really.
__________________
Hoggy Hoggy Hoggy...OI OI OI!!!

Last edited by Navdeep : 25-03-2007 at 06:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25-03-2007, 07:39 PM in reply to Navdeep's post "Vincents out"
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(NZ-captain) Passed Ken Rutherford's 2465 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,477
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
Argghh! I want to vote for none of the above!

Papps is the form player; but he's not quick enough for ODIs (and I'd still be worried he'd get sconed against Ntini!). Jamie How is not good enough at this level, whilst the Marshall brothers are only good enough to be professional twelfth men.

Can I just highlight how bloody stupid this situation is. Lou Vincent, having finally solved NZ's opening bat problem in the CB series has had his wrist broken by his own player! Sigh.

Why not call up someone who's already at the world cup - I don't mean Mark Richardson - but how's about Geoff Barnett? He's all Kiwi, not Canadian and he's an opener.

Seriously though, I expect Hamish to be called up but I hope someone else does.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-03-2007, 07:45 PM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "Argghh! I want to vote for none of the..."
adamberry's Avatar
adamberry adamberry is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
Selector of WAT Cricketers of the Year
Journalist
WAT selector - West Indies A
WAT England A Selector-2005
(AUS-captain) Passed Jack Ryder's 1394 Test runs
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: Kent, Ireland, Davington Priory CC
Posts: 1,401
Send a message via MSN to adamberry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Mellon
Why not call up someone who's already at the world cup - but how's about Geoff Barnett? He's all Kiwi, not Canadian and he's an opener.
I'm not sure that would be allowed... and anyway, if he scored bugger-all runs for Canada, how is he going to be considered for New Zealand?

I would expect New Zealand to stick McCullum back at the top of the order - he has experience there and then the Kiwis can utilise all their middle-order strengths.
__________________
"Being second is to be the first of the ones who lose."
- Ayrton Senna
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 25-03-2007, 07:46 PM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "Argghh! I want to vote for none of the..."
Nostromo's Avatar
Nostromo Nostromo is offline
(ENG) Passed Eddie Paynter's 1540 Test runs
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wootton Bassett, England
My main national team: India
My other team/s: Any team that plays well with a big heart
Posts: 1,582
Would Matthew Sinclair be considered? He is an opener.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 25-03-2007, 08:04 PM in reply to Nostromo's post starting "Would Matthew Sinclair be considered?..."
Navdeep's Avatar
Navdeep Navdeep is online now
WAT World Cup Predictor
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(ENG) Passed Sydney Barnes' 242 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Surrey
My main national team: New Zealand
My other team/s: Warwickshire/India
Posts: 249
Send a message via MSN to Navdeep Send a message via Skype™ to Navdeep
Hmmm.....heres my views.

Papps - test players in my eyes, like what has been said, too slow at this level.

How - not great, not too much experience at the higher level, and a tad slow aswell.

H Marshall - like him, not as an opener, but around 4, think he could do the job.

J Marshall - not much experience, could do a job, but wouldnt add too much to the team imo.

M Sinclair - see him more of a test player but, could do a job i guess, getting on a bit, and hasnt played recently internationally has he?

Would still have to be Hamish for me, but whats the squad vs the WI gonna be? luckily for them, they have the Tigers and Ireland as their next 2 games, maybe a chance to rotate the odd player, if they can!

Flem + Fulton?? Taylor (if fit)/Called up guy(Hamish), Styris at 4, Macca, Oram, McCullum, Vettori, Franklin, Bond, Patel/Mason.

What about the possibilities of Danny V opening again? Hasn't got the best record there i think, although im sure has made a century there...or am i dreaming Vs Zimbabwe? Did the job for the odd game back in 03, and doesnt offer much lower down the order in the 1 day game, maybe him opening with Flem, even if he just sticks around for 10 overs or so. 1 thing i really dont want, McCullum, far better player lower down, this would be unfortunate if it wrecked their chances at the trophy, injuries...

Who would the rest of you choose?
__________________
Hoggy Hoggy Hoggy...OI OI OI!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 25-03-2007, 09:17 PM in reply to adamberry's post starting "I'm not sure that would be allowed......"
Andy Mellon's Avatar
Andy Mellon Andy Mellon is offline
Moderator
WAT selector - England A 2005
WAT New Zealand A Selector
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(NZ-captain) Passed Ken Rutherford's 2465 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Essex and New Zealand
Posts: 2,477
Send a message via Yahoo to Andy Mellon
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamberry
I'm not sure that would be allowed... and anyway, if he scored bugger-all runs for Canada, how is he going to be considered for New Zealand?
I was being a little bit facetious considering the alternatives offered by Navdeep. Personally, Barnett would be a better ODI option than some of those on Navdeep's list.

Unfortunately, the list Navdeep offers will be the list that Bracewell is examining now. I would be surprised if he selected anyone other than Hamish Marshall, considering how he's stuck by him in the past through thin and thinner.

As one out of the left field, Mathew Sinclair is an option, but Bracewell hasn't supported him too much in the past. Sinclair is a class apart from Marshalls, How and even Papps, but he's more a #3 than an opener (in fact, only How and Papps are out and out openers in Navdeep's list)

Given the form Papps is in - something like 3 hundreds in the last 3 domestic games, I'd be inclined to go for him - but he's nowhere near as good a player as Vincent. This is a big loss for NZ.

EDIT: Hamish called up http://content-nz.cricinfo.com/wc200...ry/287216.html

Last edited by Andy Mellon : 25-03-2007 at 09:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 26-03-2007, 12:34 AM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "I was being a little bit facetious..."
Mr Kiwi Mr Kiwi is offline
WAT New Zealand A Selector
Big double-ton
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
My other team/s: New Zealand, Central Districts, McLaren
Posts: 251
This is pretty academic as I understand Marshall (H) has already been selected. Consider this a protest vote!

Papps has had such a monster season he's streets ahead of everyone, let alone just those on this list. Maybe in Australia someone can average over 90 and still be ignored...

I think what NZ lacks is a stable opening partnership (Duh!), and with the pitches for the world cup so far its looked more important to get a solid start rather than a flyer (I think I just read that somewhere so it must be true...).

Vincent, while in good form at the moment, is pretty volatile and the team could be better served by a Papps-like batsman (provided he doesn't duck into any more bouncers).

There's also Andy M's point that Papps and How are actually the only specialist openers of all those previously mentioned (including Vincent).
__________________
never believe anything until it is officially denied . . .
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 26-03-2007, 12:41 AM in reply to Andy Mellon's post starting "I was being a little bit facetious..."
Aussie-Yank Aussie-Yank is offline
.
(IND) Passed Vijay Merchant's 859 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davie/Fort Lauderdale/USA
My main national team: Australia
Posts: 853
Now that India has been bundled out of the the WC - I had changed my final 4 as Australia, South Africa, Sri Lanka and New Zealand (Taking India's Spot).

With this injury, I think I will swap New Zealand with the West Indies - that will be just to much for the Kiwi's to overcome.

But I will not be to surprised to see them throw egg in my face - all the best to the Kiwi's to come back from this.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 26-03-2007, 01:21 AM in reply to Aussie-Yank's post starting "Now that India has been bundled out of..."
vvvrulz's Avatar
vvvrulz vvvrulz is offline
Back from the dead.
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Zealand
My main national team: I support more than one national team
My other team/s: India, West Indies, Sri Lanka
Posts: 1,252
Send a message via MSN to vvvrulz Send a message via Yahoo to vvvrulz
Hamish is truly in Bracewell's good books, and really its no surprise to see him selected once again, even though he is not the most deserving candidate. I still stand by with what I said before the squad was selected... bring back Harry !!
__________________
- VVVRulz..
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 26-03-2007, 03:43 AM in reply to vvvrulz's post starting "Hamish is truly in Bracewell's good..."
mismaiden's Avatar
mismaiden mismaiden is offline
WAT World Cup Predictor
Half-century up
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Zealand
My main national team: New Zealand
My other team/s: England
Posts: 67
Sorry guys i think i voted too late. hamish marshall has already got the nod.. I am glad to see chris martin has made his way over there.. Maybe they could go with this side???

R. Taylor
S. Fleming (cpt)
H. Marshall
P. Fulton
G. MacMillan
J. Oram
B. McCullum (wkt)
D. Vettori
J. Franklin
S. Bond
C. Martin..
just a thought..
__________________
Dont jump in the water if you cant swim
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Page generated in 0.700 seconds (58.22% PHP - 41.78% MySQL) with 14 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0