Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

ODI and Twenty/20 Cricket Discuss current and forthcoming matches; general ODI and 20/20 issues, women's ODI cricket and ODI matches involving Associate and Affiliate members.

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2007, 03:29 PM in reply to Rachael's post starting "The reasoning for picking Yardy is..."
south beds mikey south beds mikey is offline
(ENG) Passed Andy Caddick's 861 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dunstable
My other team/s: England, Middlesex
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael View Post
The reasoning for picking Yardy is straightforward enough: firstly, England can't just rely on Panesar all the time (and need to investigate alternatives) and secondly, they have a 20-20 jamboree coming up... and in that format Yardy might well be a first XI pick.

Don't understand this at all Rach. Are you saying that we should not pick our best side in order to investigate alternatives? Perhaps we can convince West Indies to drop Chanderpaul so they can investigate their alternatives!!

I'm with you on preparing for the 20/20 and IMO the entire squad should have been based around this; after all the 20 over world cup is in 3 months, the next 50 over world cup in over 3 years. I do not however accept that Panesar should not be in the 20/20 team; look at the most successful bowlers in the competition this year, mostly spinners.

I should also point out that I'm not especially anti Yardy; its not against the rules to play 2 spinners and hopefully he can do something with the bat.

I guess we come back to our basic argument of should we pick bowlers who can't bat. Surely you pick the best bowlers on their bowling ability alone; we dont drop batsman because they can't bowl do we?
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2007, 04:26 PM in reply to south beds mikey's post starting "Don't understand this at all Rach. Are..."
Collyisamackem's Avatar
Collyisamackem Collyisamackem is offline
WAT selector - England A 2005
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chester, UK
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Somerset
Posts: 3,368
Prior goes for 52, a good effort compared to the rest of the top order. Collingwood in now to hopefully rescue us (again). Must be said though, that the bowling selections and subsequent runaway final overs for the Windies are more responsible for that!
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2007, 04:57 PM in reply to Collyisamackem's post starting "Prior goes for 52, a good effort..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,511
Raining now with England on 153-5 after 33 overs, and surely a long way behind on D/L (if that comes into play).
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2007, 06:26 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "Raining now with England on 153-5 after..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is offline
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,511
Well, it didn't come to Duckworth-Lewis: West Indies beat England by 61 runs. Well done to them. I've not followed the match at all today, but the Cricinfo commentary reads as poorly as ever for England in one-day games. Seems to me that they really don't have much of a clue how to play the short version of the game. Hey-ho! Decider on Saturday at Trent Bridge.
__________________
Money won't buy you friends. But it gets you a better class of enemy.
Spike Milligan
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2007, 07:16 PM in reply to Occasional Fan's post starting "Well, it didn't come to..."
pie_chucker's Avatar
pie_chucker pie_chucker is offline
Moderator
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(SA) Passed Colin Bland's 1669 Test runs
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northumberland, England
My main national team: England
My other team/s: Durham, Newcastle United
Posts: 1,693
Oh well a typically poor performance by England again.

Why arent we able to bat in ODI's?

And why do the selectors seem unable to pick the right bowling attack.?

We should only play 1 of Anderson, Sidebottom and Broad. We should never play Yardy (he's barely better than Dalrymple!). The captain and coach sould realise that we are batting no better than in the World Cup. With Bell and Cook in the top 3 we are never going to be able to get off to flying starts and more than likely get bogged down.
__________________
Mark.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2007, 07:24 PM in reply to pie_chucker's post starting "Oh well a typically poor performance by..."
Ernest's Avatar
Ernest Ernest is offline
Administrator
WAT England A Selector
Selector-World XI (1980 onwards)
(WI-captain) Passed Brian Lara's 11953 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire
My main national team: None - I support cricket in general
My other team/s: ::All "Test" Playing Nations
Posts: 13,615
Send a message via Yahoo to Ernest Send a message via Skype™ to Ernest
Quote:
Originally Posted by pie_chucker View Post
Oh well a typically poor performance by England again.
Yep it's years now rather than months since any notable success.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pie_chucker
Why arent we able to bat in ODI's?

And why do the selectors seem unable to pick the right bowling attack.?
Because they mix test players with one day players, England need a specialist one day side - not just a seperate captain.

It's even dragging Pietersens form down, even he has done nothing of note since the first couple of tests - he will get the same label as Flintoff, and probably fall down the same hole.
__________________
Ern
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:04 AM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Yep it's years now rather than months..."
south beds mikey south beds mikey is offline
(ENG) Passed Andy Caddick's 861 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dunstable
My other team/s: England, Middlesex
Posts: 873
Its another failure. How often do we need to drop our best players before we realise that it does not work. You really must pick your best side. We have finally got a left armer who can really bowl and yet he gets dropped which must be an outragers situation. No other side would do it IMO.Can you really see Sri Lanka dropping Muralli or Aussie dropping Warne 0r NZ droppig Vetorri.

An absolute joke. The coaching staff need to take a long hard look at them selves.,
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:05 AM in reply to Ernest's post starting "Yep it's years now rather than months..."
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Administrator
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: England
Posts: 3,341
Send a message via Yahoo to admin Send a message via Skype™ to admin
To my reckoning, the major variables that contributed to England's defeat were: Chanderpaul is in a purple patch and difficult to remove by any England bowler; the wicket was slow which might have suited Panesar had he played; the constant rain delays and threat of the game being decided by D/L affected the batting.

Let's face it, England need to have everything in their favour to win ODIs because they aren't a good enough side to overcome non-favourable conditions. This was one of those days where the variables were too much to overcome.
__________________
Administrator
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:10 AM in reply to south beds mikey's post starting "Its another failure. How often do we..."
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Administrator
(WI) Passed Jeffery Dujon's 3322 Test runs
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: England
Posts: 3,341
Send a message via Yahoo to admin Send a message via Skype™ to admin
Quote:
Originally Posted by south beds mikey View Post
Its another failure. How often do we need to drop our best players before we realise that it does not work. An absolute joke. The coaching staff need to take a long hard look at them selves.,
I think Moores has one eye on the upcoming Test series against India. The bowlers he rested will probably participate in that series. These days the workload of players is carefully managed. England need to develop more depth to stay competitive when key players are resting.
__________________
Administrator
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:22 AM in reply to admin's post starting "I think Moores has one eye on the..."
south beds mikey south beds mikey is offline
(ENG) Passed Andy Caddick's 861 Test runs
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dunstable
My other team/s: England, Middlesex
Posts: 873
We have an absolute gem in Panesar IMO. I can not believe we ever put a side out when he doesnt play. A real joke. Perhaps the management has to have a look. We really have to pick him
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 AM.

Page generated in 0.536 seconds (66.56% PHP - 33.44% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0