Hide/show banner
Fantasy Cricket

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > Pakistan Cricket Forum > PAK Archived Threads 2004
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 14-10-2004, 03:47 PM
Nikhil's Avatar
Nikhil Nikhil is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
My other team/s: India, Maharashtra & Liverpool FC
Posts: 437
Pakistan Vs Srilanka

Looks like a cracker of an ODI is going on there. This is the present status of the match:

Code:
Sri Lanka 293/6 (50 ov)
Pakistan 190/2 (36.0 ov) 	
Pakistan require another 104 runs with 8 wickets and 14.0 overs remaining
Pakistan RR: 5.28
Required RR: 7.43
I must say Pakistan are still in the driving seat, since the asking run rate is not great and Inzi is there.
__________________

You'll Never Walk Alone !!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 14-10-2004, 05:28 PM in reply to Nikhil's post "Pakistan Vs Srilanka"
Shaka's Avatar
Shaka Shaka is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
My other team/s: Pakistan
Posts: 748
Pakistan won by 6 wkts and they were never really in much danger of losing it. The openers put on 99 with the top 3 batsmen getting over 150 between them. That pretty much set it up for the rolls royce of Pakistan's batting line up, Inzimam and Youhanna to cruise home, the asking run rate of almost 8/over proving not much of a challenge at all.

Salman Butt got his maiden 50 and will probably be the long term replacement for Saeed Anwar. His offside play is so fluent that Sri lanka had seven players on that side of the wicket to try and stop him scoring. His timing was so sweet that he blocked a ball and it went racing for 4!

Shoaib Akhtar was a disgrace today, and for a senior player to show such a bad attitude reeks. The fielding from both sides was below standard too. One other point should be noted that Inzimam chose to bat first as he didn't want to bowl under the lights when the ball becomes wet because of the dew. SL had to change the ball 3 times in the Pakistan innings and D/N matches should not be considered for important matches like the final on Saturday. The discrepancy in the conditions between the two innings makes it like watching two different matches.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 14-10-2004, 08:00 PM in reply to Shaka's post starting "Pakistan won by 6 wkts and they were..."
fair_&_balance's Avatar
fair_&_balance fair_&_balance is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
My other team/s: India
Posts: 89
congrats to all Pakistano Supporters.
This outfit is coming out to be as one great ODI team. They have almost everythign what it takes to be a good ODI.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 14-10-2004, 08:37 PM in reply to fair_&_balance's post starting "congrats to all Pakistano Supporters...."
Shaka's Avatar
Shaka Shaka is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
My other team/s: Pakistan
Posts: 748
If the opening batting slots can be consolidated then yes it's a very strong line up. There are 4 all rounders in the side, Naved Rana, Abdul Razzaq, Shoaib Malik and Shahid Afridi who are all very capable of producing the goods with either bat or ball. When you have Shahid Afridi coming in at no 8 with Rana at 9 who is no mug with the bat, that's a lot of depth with the option of 6 bowlers too. When Shabbir Ahmed is fit, he could replace either Shoaib or Sami depending on who wants it more. Shabbir can get swing, seam and lift...while Shoaib and Sami are better at bowling at the death, he is definitely a better option with the new ball. With Umar Gul to come back (hopefully) in 2005 I would say it's up to Sami and Shoaib to fight for their spots in this team.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 14-10-2004, 09:33 PM in reply to Shaka's post starting "If the opening batting slots can be..."
Nikhil's Avatar
Nikhil Nikhil is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
My other team/s: India, Maharashtra & Liverpool FC
Posts: 437
Yes. Umar Gul looked quite a good bowler. He should certainly play for Pakistan.

This side is coming good. The batsmen are settling in their positions. But I think Pakistan would like to find a more genuine number three batsman than Shoaib Malik in test matches. Hamid looks a better number three for tests and if they find a good opening pair, Pakistan will have a good batting line-up for tests. The winter series to Australia is going to be interesting. I think the key to Pakistan's success will be to keep the Aussie pacers out of the game. It will be interesting to see what batting combination do they play down-under.
__________________

You'll Never Walk Alone !!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 14-10-2004, 10:21 PM in reply to Nikhil's post starting "Yes. Umar Gul looked quite a good..."
fair_&_balance's Avatar
fair_&_balance fair_&_balance is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
My other team/s: India
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikhil
Yes. Umar Gul looked quite a good bowler. He should certainly play for Pakistan.

This side is coming good. The batsmen are settling in their positions. But I think Pakistan would like to find a more genuine number three batsman than Shoaib Malik in test matches. Hamid looks a better number three for tests and if they find a good opening pair, Pakistan will have a good batting line-up for tests. The winter series to Australia is going to be interesting. I think the key to Pakistan's success will be to keep the Aussie pacers out of the game. It will be interesting to see what batting combination do they play down-under.
Well Nikhil Shoib isnot going to play at NO. 3 in test matches. I am not sure if he will even play in test matches. My comment about pakistani being very good team was with respect to ODIs. I think they have a long way to go in Test matches. Batting is too fragile for a test team. Only Yoyo,Inzi & Akmal are the guy who can play good in test matches. Out of which Akmal is yet to play outside Pakistan.Other than these 3 rest are just waste of time. I thought Taufeeq was good but looks like after his last performance against India he is out of favour with Selectors.

Last edited by fair_&_balance : 14-10-2004 at 10:23 PM.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 14-10-2004, 11:32 PM in reply to fair_&_balance's post starting "congrats to all Pakistano Supporters...."
Maranello's Avatar
Maranello Maranello is offline
Moderator
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - England A 2005
(PAK-captain) Passed Mushtaq Mohammad's 3643 Test runs
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dubai
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 3,700
Yeh, excellent performance today by most of the team.. especially the batsmen...flat-track bullies, every single one of them!!!

I think the current mix of the ODI team is pretty good...and would say that we can probably aim for WI-2007 with a broadly similar side. The only changes that might happen by then are in the pace bowling dept, where Shoaib would be past his sell-by date, and Gul & Shabbir should be more accomplished.

Apart from that, I don't see need for major changes to the ODI set-up in the next 2-3 years... only a lot of fine-tuning and work on fitness and tactics etc... any comments?
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 15-10-2004, 09:17 AM in reply to Maranello's post starting "Yeh, excellent performance today by..."
Shaka's Avatar
Shaka Shaka is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
My other team/s: Pakistan
Posts: 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maranello
I think the current mix of the ODI team is pretty good...and would say that we can probably aim for WI-2007 with a broadly similar side. The only changes that might happen by then are in the pace bowling dept, where Shoaib would be past his sell-by date, and Gul & Shabbir should be more accomplished.

Apart from that, I don't see need for major changes to the ODI set-up in the next 2-3 years... only a lot of fine-tuning and work on fitness and tactics etc... any comments?
I still think the opening slots need to be consolidated. While Salman Butt looks like a million dollars he needs to prove he has the hunger and desire to make big scores and not just settle for cameo 20's and 30's. His fielding isn't the best so he has to make up for it with the bat. I think he will be competing for that 2nd opener spot with another left-hander, Imran Farhat.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 15-10-2004, 03:05 PM in reply to Nikhil's post "Pakistan Vs Srilanka"
Zainub Zainub is offline
WAT Pakistan A Selector
WAT selector - Zimbabwe A 2005
Founder of the Official World-A-Team King of Spain Fan Club
WAT Journalist  Read my Articles
(ENG-captain) Passed Ted Dexter's 4502 Test runs
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Karachi
My main national team: Pakistan
Posts: 4,515
Good performance by Pakistan, particularly a delightful display of batting by Inzi. I hope we win Saturday's final as well , but I'm not sure why they have scheduled it one the First of Ramadan - I'm sure (almost 100%) that the crowds are going to stay away, even more so since it is a day and night match. I don't think we should play any cricket at all in Ramadan for that matter - it's just ridicolous.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 15-10-2004, 03:17 PM in reply to Zainub's post starting "Good performance by Pakistan,..."
Occasional Fan Occasional Fan is online now
Moderator
(NZ-captain) Passed Martin Crowe's 5444 Test runs
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
My main national team: England
Posts: 5,517
Given the obligation of fasting during daylight, that really is strange scheduling.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 AM.

Page generated in 0.593 seconds (65.09% PHP - 34.91% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0