| | |
| |
| Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion. |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Kamran Akmal - finally, a proper wicket-keeper.... Not one to jump on a band-wagon, I wasn't sure if today is the right day to start an Akmal eulogy. In my defense, almost all of what I say would have held true before today too, but would probably not have merited as much attention. Wicketkeeping gets many of us very excited, and judging by the numerous Read v Jones threads, something people feel strongly about, so another wicket-keeping thread is always a good idea Akmal seems to me to be one of the better gloveman around today. He is a natural, with soft hands and economy of movement behind the stumps. Keeping to the pace of Akhtar and Sami, and the guile of Kaneria cannot be easy, but this young lad manages it with aplomb, hardly ever conceding byes. In that, he is heads and shoulders above many of his contemporaries, though to be fair, there is a dearth of genuine gloveman around - most teams, in trying to manufacture their own Gilchrist, select batsmen who can keep a bit, and hence the numerous byes conceded in Tests these days. During the Australia tour, Ian Healy, who probably knows a thing or two about keeping, was raving about Kamran Akmal's excellence, and how this kid was a natural behind the stumps in a way that Gilchrist et al are not. The other pundits, including Chappelli, were similarly impressed. Pakistanis have long maintained that Kamran is a very good keeper, and it was only his apparent lack of batting ability which has hindered his progress to date. Inzamam and Woolmer's decision to select only Kamran for the Australian tour, with no w/keeping over, seems an inspired move in retrospect. The young guy was given great confidence by the team management, and he repaid that with a century in the ODIs. Some Pakistanis still hankered for the days of Moin Khan and Rashid Latif, but Kamran's performance with the bat should ensure that those days are long gone. Personally, I have always believed that not everyone can be a Gilchrist, and other countries should select their best gloveman for this important role, regardless of his proficiency with the bat. No football club would select a goalkeeper on the basis of the better taker of free-kicks; they would pick the best shot-stopper and goal-blocker. Wicket-keeping similarly is a proper art, and a defined role; let's stop messing with it to accomodate part-timers. I think, simply as a keeper, Akmal can develop into a potential world-class player. He has the athleticism and the agility, but more importantly, the technique which means that he does not have to rely solely on diving about athletically. Contrary to popular belief, a gloveman does not have to act like an Olympic gymnast to be successful I will end on the following from Wisden/Cricinfo today: Quote:
__________________ A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes Mark Twain |
| |||
| Good post M. No doubt in my mind that the careers of Moin and Rashid are long over, I reckoned they were over even before the India series started. They were over from the very day the Australia squad was announced. Kamran Akmal is as of now in my humble opinion the most natural keeper in world cricket. Wasim Bari always says that keepers aren't made, they're born, and Karma Akmal certainly fills that bill. I don't really care one bit if people do or do not want to rate him as the 2nd, 3rd, 4th or whatever best ranked keeper in the world, the most important thing for me is that he is the best man in Pakistan, and the way to go about for hopefully a very long time. I couldn't have been happier with the progress he's made. Its very satisfying indeed. I think what's helped him too is the time he had to wait to get into the first team. Ramiz Raja and Sanjay Manjerekar raised this point in the commentary box, and I seem to agree with them. Having looked at the Indian keeper Karthick and before him Patel I did think both were naturally suitable of being first rate keepers but what they lacked, or seem to be lacking in Karthick's case is experience. Both Karthick and Patel were intoduced into test cricket as teenagers when they'd barely played one or two full first class seasons. As apposed to them Kamran Akmal has a very healthy 90 first class game experience to benefit from, owing to Rashid and Moin's strong hold in the national squad he's had to wait for his chances much longer then some other keepers around, and that's really toughened him up. Seeing how Denish Karthick quickly got under pressure keeping to Kumble in the second innings after letting go a few byes he probably should have stopped I couldn't help resist comparing how well in contrast Akmal has responded to the task of saving the match from the position we were in. I also couldn't help compare how in comparision with some of the other keepers in world cricket Kamran Akmal seems to be responding to the pressures of international cricket in a much more composed fashion then some of the others. It really was satisfying feeling. |
| ||||
| Pre-Australian tour, i thought Moin was the man---perhaps even Rashid..Kamran Akmal's agile wicketkeeping however has led me to believe Pakistan have a star, and i was presently surprised with his 124 off as many balls against the Windies up in Brisbane, and he has poise under pressure as well, 109 vs India case in point... For a Pakistani or Indian cricketer, the biggest stage is against each other...Kamran passes the first test with flying colours |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |