Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rachael That's a worthwhile point and certainly is grounds for cutting the guy some slack.. but it doesn't alter the fact that he really does suck right now.
The comparison with Flintoff depends, to my mind, on his temperament. I get the impression that it's pretty decent.. and if it is the eye for the ball and ability to propel a heavy ball at a decent pace should give the coaches every chance of producing a second Flintoff.
Let's hope that this time around the coaching staff do their stuff BEFORE the guy blights the national side rather than forcing the team to carry him for 30+ Tests! |
I'm not sure he's a pure alrounder like people think. Last year (the year you think he might really kick on, and also the year with all Surreys bowling woes, that he might have got a decent crack at bowling at county batters) he managed a fairly average 31.17 with the bat - however, he bowled around 110 overs taking only 9 wkts at 57.55 each, and at a strike rate of 73!
Compare that to Ian Bell who not only scored his runs at 68.56 and took 16 wkts at 27 each with a strike rate of 56.
Maybe it's time for Clarke's coaches to pick what he's good at and make him into a talented batter who could be a 6th bowler - it might help to focus his talents by concentrating on one thing.