Hide/show banner
West Indies Cricket Forum

Welcome to the World-A-Team Cricket Forum. We promote friendly, good-natured, quality cricket discussion.
Go Back   World A-Team Cricket Forum > West Indies Cricket Forum
Sitemap Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Contact Us Chat Room Shoutbox News Podcasts Fantasy Cricket

West Indies Cricket Forum A forum for domestic cricket discussion.
Tell us about your favourite club in the West Indies. Who are the key players to watch?

Reply Without Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 23-02-2008, 12:30 AM in reply to jrwb's post "Huh!!"
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
(ENG) Passed John Snow's 772 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, Bangladesh
Posts: 809
First of all, I'm Australian, not West Indian.

Secondly, if it isn't Bravo, then who is the best young allrounder in the world? Not Pathan. His bowling figures are massively inflated against the likes of Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. Not Maharoof. He's a total non-performer at Test level. Not Broad. He's only played one Test so far, and only a handful of ODIs. And certainly not Watson, who's constantly injured and seriously overestimates his capabilities as a bowler.

So what's Bravo's case? He's scored centuries against South Africa and Australia- pretty tough opposition. He's taken 5-fers against Australia and England- again, pretty good opposition. As a batsman, he's one of the most reliable number 6's in the world, scoring consistently in his last two series in England and in South Africa. As a bowler, he knows his capabilities- he doesn't try to bowl too fast, but he's developed into a good medium-fast bowler with a good slower ball, who's pretty accurate as well. In his last series in South Africa, he took eight wickets from three matches (despite only bowling in two) with an economy of under 3. Against a batting lineup which includes Smith, Gibbs and De Villiers, that's some pretty impressive stuff. In addition to this, he's a seriously good fielder, and the vice-captain to boot (although that could change when Sarwan comes back).

One more thing. It's true that I haven't been a member of this forum for as long as most others, but I'm pretty sure that blatant sarcasm isn't really in its spirit.

Last edited by Aurelius : 23-02-2008 at 12:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 23-02-2008, 01:57 AM in reply to Aurelius's post starting "First of all, I'm Australian, not West..."
jrwb's Avatar
jrwb jrwb is offline
Maiden century
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Commonwealth of Dominica
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: England
Posts: 100
So there....!

"One more thing. It's true that I haven't been a member of this forum for as long as most others, but I'm pretty sure that blatant sarcasm isn't really in its spirit."

Before I say anything, kindly restrict your comments to cricket, my sarcasm is merely intended as a joke; and in keeping with the spirit of these forums, no personal insult was intended or indeed given.

With regard to Shane Watson and that er...Bravo - note that they are aged 27 and 25 respectively (i.e. they will reach those ages this year), so I would hardly call them young in modern sporting terms.

The age of 21 or 22 would be called young - but remember that Mushtaq Mohammed wasn't yet 16 when he first played for Pakistan...
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 23-02-2008, 03:51 AM in reply to jrwb's post "So there....!"
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
(ENG) Passed John Snow's 772 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, Bangladesh
Posts: 809
Quote:
Before I say anything, kindly restrict your comments to cricket, my sarcasm is merely intended as a joke; and in keeping with the spirit of these forums, no personal insult was intended or indeed given.
Yeah, you're right, that was an over-reaction on my part. I apologise.

Quote:
With regard to Shane Watson and that er...Bravo - note that they are aged 27 and 25 respectively (i.e. they will reach those ages this year), so I would hardly call them young in modern sporting terms.
Hey, they're both older than I am! I guess I meant "young" in the experience sense. Bravo, Pathan, Watson and the rest have only played a limited number of games, so while I wouldn't necessarily call them inexperienced, I do regard them as being in the early stages of their careers. IMO, Bravo has the most potential to build on his ability.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 24-02-2008, 01:33 AM in reply to Aurelius's post starting "Yeah, you're right, that was an..."
jrwb's Avatar
jrwb jrwb is offline
Maiden century
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Commonwealth of Dominica
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: England
Posts: 100
Granted...

Granted that Aurelius is absolutely correct, Dwayne Bravo's test match stastistics are noticeably superior to those of Shane Watson.

I have a bad habit - at least some would consider it so - whenever I mention a player's perfomance, I usually never consider his one-day or 20-20 ability.

For me test match cricket is, as the name suggests, the test, the real examination...
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 24-02-2008, 01:55 AM in reply to jrwb's post "Granted..."
Aurelius Aurelius is offline
(ENG) Passed John Snow's 772 Test runs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Perth, Australia
My main national team: West Indies
My other team/s: Australia, Bangladesh
Posts: 809
Absolutely, Test cricket is the ultimate. But I think that if a bowler, for example, is able to go at 6 runs or under in T20, then that speaks volumes about his ability.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 24-02-2008, 02:07 AM in reply to Aurelius's post starting "Absolutely, Test cricket is the..."
jrwb's Avatar
jrwb jrwb is offline
Maiden century
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Commonwealth of Dominica
My main national team: Australia
My other team/s: England
Posts: 100
Angry

Valid point. I have to profess my ignorance of one-day cricket in many regards.

What annoys me most about one-day cricket is the point when the game becomes critical, and the fast bowlers start bowling full-tosses one behind the other, and the batsmen start swinging wildly at everything, and skill and good sense get thrown to the wind - a lot of fun for the crowd, but to me a reduction of the dignity of cricket to something like a drunken orgy...
Reply With Quote
Reply Without Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21 AM.

Page generated in 0.442 seconds (61.57% PHP - 38.43% MySQL) with 13 queries

Partner Sites: - pakistancricketzone.com | Fantasy Cricket | Cricket World Cup Images | Cricket 24/7 | Third Umpire | Indian Cricket League

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0